| Clarence House staff sacked 09:46 - Sep 14 with 1361 views | onehunglow |
100 lose their jobs because Chaeles wont be living there.
A museum in the future? |  |
| |  |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 10:04 - Sep 14 with 1332 views | trampie |
Respect should be a two way thing, press reporting letters sent out saying jobs at risk during the mourning period, very very poor. |  |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 12:37 - Sep 14 with 1263 views | gadgetuk |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 10:04 - Sep 14 by trampie |
Respect should be a two way thing, press reporting letters sent out saying jobs at risk during the mourning period, very very poor. |
I think it's a legal obligation that they have to be informed as soon as possible - the timing is rubbish but I don't think they have a choice. | | | |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:07 - Sep 14 with 1249 views | felixstowe_jack |
The headline is of course deliberately provocative. I doubt anyone will be sacked as the only grounds for sacking anyone is seroius misconduct.
I think the poster meant some redundancies.
No doubt some staff across the staff at all palaces will be offered voluntary redundancy on very goods terms. Some will take it some won't. Some will be redeployed to other duties. It is almost as if the poster wanted to be offensive and controversial. | |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:14 - Sep 14 with 1244 views | onehunglow |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:07 - Sep 14 by felixstowe_jack |
The headline is of course deliberately provocative. I doubt anyone will be sacked as the only grounds for sacking anyone is seroius misconduct.
I think the poster meant some redundancies.
No doubt some staff across the staff at all palaces will be offered voluntary redundancy on very goods terms. Some will take it some won't. Some will be redeployed to other duties. It is almost as if the poster wanted to be offensive and controversial. |
Wrong.
Not provocative at all. It is fact.
Gossamer line between sacked and made redundant .
My point shows how overweight the current Monarchy is. | |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:52 - Sep 14 with 1218 views | union_jack |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:07 - Sep 14 by felixstowe_jack |
The headline is of course deliberately provocative. I doubt anyone will be sacked as the only grounds for sacking anyone is seroius misconduct.
I think the poster meant some redundancies.
No doubt some staff across the staff at all palaces will be offered voluntary redundancy on very goods terms. Some will take it some won't. Some will be redeployed to other duties. It is almost as if the poster wanted to be offensive and controversial. |
Don’t let common sense spoil a good story. I’d wager that is exactly what will happen. |  |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:59 - Sep 14 with 1216 views | pencoedjack |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:07 - Sep 14 by felixstowe_jack |
The headline is of course deliberately provocative. I doubt anyone will be sacked as the only grounds for sacking anyone is seroius misconduct.
I think the poster meant some redundancies.
No doubt some staff across the staff at all palaces will be offered voluntary redundancy on very goods terms. Some will take it some won't. Some will be redeployed to other duties. It is almost as if the poster wanted to be offensive and controversial. |
Without searching I presume reported in the guardian? |  | | |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 14:16 - Sep 14 with 1194 views | trampie |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 12:37 - Sep 14 by gadgetuk |
I think it's a legal obligation that they have to be informed as soon as possible - the timing is rubbish but I don't think they have a choice. |
They could have been informed after the mourning period. | |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 15:20 - Sep 14 with 1142 views | Flashberryjack |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:52 - Sep 14 by union_jack |
Don’t let common sense spoil a good story. I’d wager that is exactly what will happen. |
They should keep all the staff, even if their job no longer exists.
Every employer does that, don't they ? |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Clarence House staff sacked on 15:28 - Sep 14 with 1133 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 14:16 - Sep 14 by trampie |
They could have been informed after the mourning period. |
Not done employment year for about 15 years, but I'm pretty sure there was something about letting the employees know as soon as possible. |  | | |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 15:46 - Sep 14 with 1104 views | trampie |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 15:28 - Sep 14 by Sirjohnalot |
Not done employment year for about 15 years, but I'm pretty sure there was something about letting the employees know as soon as possible. |
Impossible to police, Royal Family leave nothing to chance we are told so the power brokers would have known what was going to happen before the Queens death with Charles going to succeed her and therefore the employees should have been told the day the Queen died, if it's a myth that 'nothing is left to chance' then Charles would have been unlikely to make a decision on Clarence House during the mourning period when his head could be in the shed and he is busy with funeral arrangements and being made King.
So it doesn't make sense the employees been told during the mourning period because that suggests a decision was made during the mourning period and that is unlikely, they should have been told the day the Queen died to fit in with English law (I told you English law was rubbish, us Welsh would have much better laws if independent) as I reckon it's likely it was known at that point, but nothing can be proved no doubt, I might have been born at night but it was not last night. [Post edited 14 Sep 2022 16:05]
| |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 17:53 - Sep 14 with 1044 views | pencoedjack |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:07 - Sep 14 by felixstowe_jack |
The headline is of course deliberately provocative. I doubt anyone will be sacked as the only grounds for sacking anyone is seroius misconduct.
I think the poster meant some redundancies.
No doubt some staff across the staff at all palaces will be offered voluntary redundancy on very goods terms. Some will take it some won't. Some will be redeployed to other duties. It is almost as if the poster wanted to be offensive and controversial. |
Staff who are made redundant are expected to be offered the opportunity to take up alternative employment across all royal households, assistance in finding new jobs externally and an “enhanced” redundancy payment beyond the statutory minimum.
A small number of staff providing personal support to Charles and Camilla will remain in post, though no final decisions are understood to have been taken ahead of the consultation period, which begins after Monday’s funeral.
It was the Guardian. | | | |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 21:43 - Sep 14 with 956 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 17:53 - Sep 14 by pencoedjack |
Staff who are made redundant are expected to be offered the opportunity to take up alternative employment across all royal households, assistance in finding new jobs externally and an “enhanced” redundancy payment beyond the statutory minimum.
A small number of staff providing personal support to Charles and Camilla will remain in post, though no final decisions are understood to have been taken ahead of the consultation period, which begins after Monday’s funeral.
It was the Guardian. |
Well yes, the job no longer exists therefore they have to be made aware that their position may be gone | | | |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 21:48 - Sep 14 with 952 views | Catullus |
Will the new PoW not be using Clarence house? Some of these staff will likely be made redundant and then apply for a job under the new resident, assuming that happens. William and Kate may be very happy just where they are. | |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 22:33 - Sep 14 with 929 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
Some staff told that they at risk with a three month consultation period. I always like the comments in the media such as 'it is understood that some staff are upset' |  |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 00:06 - Sep 15 with 888 views | lifelong |
Perhaps the King can lob them a few million out of the mega bucks he will inherit from the Queen? |  | | |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 11:45 - Sep 15 with 794 views | felixstowe_jack |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 17:53 - Sep 14 by pencoedjack |
Staff who are made redundant are expected to be offered the opportunity to take up alternative employment across all royal households, assistance in finding new jobs externally and an “enhanced” redundancy payment beyond the statutory minimum.
A small number of staff providing personal support to Charles and Camilla will remain in post, though no final decisions are understood to have been taken ahead of the consultation period, which begins after Monday’s funeral.
It was the Guardian. |
Correct so no one actually sacked then. | |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 16:50 - Sep 15 with 739 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:52 - Sep 14 by union_jack |
Don’t let common sense spoil a good story. I’d wager that is exactly what will happen. |
In football and matters Royal fact is stranger than fiction. You might deny Charles has 5 butlers when in fact he has 13.
Martin was keen to meet Sir Elton John despite they being cultural adversaries. Martin is for sustainability which is lucky for the US owners. Sustainability mean cutting his own cloth. Sir Elton on the other hand once spent £300,000 in one year on flowers. Sir Elton's whole ethos is waste and extravagance.
King Charles ia addicted to waste high living and privilege. His job was to stay out of public affairs and he did the opposite. The chopper pad is ready at Sophia Gardens. "He aint catching no train. |  |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 16:52 - Sep 15 with 734 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 16:50 - Sep 15 by ReslovenSwan1 |
In football and matters Royal fact is stranger than fiction. You might deny Charles has 5 butlers when in fact he has 13.
Martin was keen to meet Sir Elton John despite they being cultural adversaries. Martin is for sustainability which is lucky for the US owners. Sustainability mean cutting his own cloth. Sir Elton on the other hand once spent £300,000 in one year on flowers. Sir Elton's whole ethos is waste and extravagance.
King Charles ia addicted to waste high living and privilege. His job was to stay out of public affairs and he did the opposite. The chopper pad is ready at Sophia Gardens. "He aint catching no train. |
Do you expect the King to jump on the Arriva Wales ? | | | |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 11:41 - Sep 16 with 660 views | union_jack |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 16:52 - Sep 15 by Sirjohnalot |
Do you expect the King to jump on the Arriva Wales ? |
Absolutely not.
He should have cycled.
And as for sticking his nose in, he did it because he could give weight to deserved issues. He’s gone on record to say that now he’s got the top job there’ll be no more of that. | |
| |
| Clarence House staff sacked on 13:30 - Sep 16 with 632 views | gadgetuk |
It's funny mind, no one batted an eyelid when Harry and Meghan sacked their entire staff with no notice period but everyone is up in arms when the correct consultation process is engaged for staff at Clarence House. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
