| Mike Amesbury jail sentence 18:21 - Feb 24 with 943 views | onehunglow |
Knocks a constituent to the ground then follows up as he's on the floor
In fairness,a decent left jab
Probably end up on a by election
[Post edited 24 Feb 18:23]
|  |
| |  |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 18:39 - Feb 24 with 899 views | majorraglan |
His sentence is an automatic trigger for a recall petition to be opened - he’s toast and he’s only got himself to blame for it. Sticks and stones ……
Sends a good message out, no one is above the law. Tarra Chuck… | | | |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 21:34 - Feb 25 with 727 views | Flashberryjack |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 18:39 - Feb 24 by majorraglan |
His sentence is an automatic trigger for a recall petition to be opened - he’s toast and he’s only got himself to blame for it. Sticks and stones ……
Sends a good message out, no one is above the law. Tarra Chuck… |
He's still on full wages. |  |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 22:19 - Feb 25 with 684 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 21:34 - Feb 25 by Flashberryjack |
He's still on full wages. |
If I punched one of my customers I would be sacked immediately on the basis of gross misconduct. |  |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 23:21 - Feb 25 with 661 views | majorraglan |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 22:19 - Feb 25 by JACKMANANDBOY |
If I punched one of my customers I would be sacked immediately on the basis of gross misconduct. |
That would be the case in most places, and if it weren’t immediate it would follow as a result of some disciplinary investigation or process.
He’ll get his comeuppance, but we have to go through the existing process first. | | | |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 12:08 - Feb 27 with 472 views | union_jack |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 23:21 - Feb 25 by majorraglan |
That would be the case in most places, and if it weren’t immediate it would follow as a result of some disciplinary investigation or process.
He’ll get his comeuppance, but we have to go through the existing process first. |
Reduced to 2 years suspended under appeal😡 |  |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 12:12 - Feb 27 with 461 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 12:08 - Feb 27 by union_jack |
Reduced to 2 years suspended under appeal😡 |
Those who talk about a two tier justice system seem to be correct. | |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 13:05 - Feb 27 with 405 views | raynor94 |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 12:08 - Feb 27 by union_jack |
Reduced to 2 years suspended under appeal😡 |
What is the point of the original sentence, they have now found a judge more to their liking.
It really is a two tier system, imagine if one of us did that in Wind street! |  |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 13:30 - Feb 27 with 382 views | controversial_jack |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 13:05 - Feb 27 by raynor94 |
What is the point of the original sentence, they have now found a judge more to their liking.
It really is a two tier system, imagine if one of us did that in Wind street! |
I thought 10 weeks was a bit much. Most would avoid jail unless it was more serious offence like a section 18. Original judge messed up | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 13:47 - Feb 27 with 346 views | AnotherJohn |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 12:12 - Feb 27 by JACKMANANDBOY |
Those who talk about a two tier justice system seem to be correct. |
It does make me wonder what is happening when Amesbury gets out of jail after 3 days for knocking seven bells out of some poor sap, while a middle-aged nursery worker got 40% of 31 months for unwisely posting on social media that people could do horrible things to asylum seekers "for all I care".
Edit. N.B. Amesbury's sentence is still 10 weeks but suspended for two years, not as the post above said a two year suspended sentence. [Post edited 27 Feb 13:51]
| | | |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 14:14 - Feb 27 with 321 views | raynor94 |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 13:30 - Feb 27 by controversial_jack |
I thought 10 weeks was a bit much. Most would avoid jail unless it was more serious offence like a section 18. Original judge messed up |
Yet the second judge said the original sentence was "spot on" but he decided to suspend it.
I can understand if it was one punch, but he punched him 5 times whilst on the floor. | |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 14:18 - Feb 27 with 309 views | Whiterockin |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 14:14 - Feb 27 by raynor94 |
Yet the second judge said the original sentence was "spot on" but he decided to suspend it.
I can understand if it was one punch, but he punched him 5 times whilst on the floor. |
Can the person attacked bring a civil case. It wouldn't take long to crowd fund the costs if it was possible. |  | | |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 16:43 - Feb 27 with 237 views | controversial_jack |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 14:14 - Feb 27 by raynor94 |
Yet the second judge said the original sentence was "spot on" but he decided to suspend it.
I can understand if it was one punch, but he punched him 5 times whilst on the floor. |
He said it was spot on then suspended it? Obviously it wasn't then. | | | |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 16:44 - Feb 27 with 236 views | onehunglow |
Justice my arse | |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 17:04 - Feb 27 with 220 views | AnotherJohn |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 14:18 - Feb 27 by Whiterockin |
Can the person attacked bring a civil case. It wouldn't take long to crowd fund the costs if it was possible. |
Not really my field, but as far as I can see there are two options for a victim who feels the sentence was too lenient, or that the outcome has not compensated for the harm done..
1. Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme. “Under the extended scheme, victims will be given the power to challenge the sentences of a wider range of crimes in circumstances where they, or the public (those unconnected to the case), believe a punishment to be too lenient. (…) The ULS scheme permits prosecutors, victims, their families and the public to make an application to the Attorney General to review a sentence that they believe to be too low. Only one request need be lodged, which must be done within 28 days of the court hearing taking place.”
2. Civil case. Certainly possible but centres on a claim for compensation for harm done (whether physical or psychological) and so is about monetary damages rather than a harsher sentence. There are a few options here:
https://prettys.co.uk/articles/compensation-for-criminal-acts-can-i-make-a-claim | | | |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 17:19 - Feb 27 with 208 views | raynor94 |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 16:43 - Feb 27 by controversial_jack |
He said it was spot on then suspended it? Obviously it wasn't then. |
The length was spot on, but he thought it could be suspended, I certainly don't think it should be | |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 19:07 - Feb 27 with 144 views | majorraglan |
The judge who initially sentenced Amesbury was a deputy district judge and junior to the judge who reviewed the sentence today. There’s no doubt Amesbury deserved a stretch, but I was surprised given the fact we’re releasing people early he didn’t get a suspended sentence.
There’s judge hearing the case today was sitting with two magistrates at Crown Court and he also ordered Amesbury to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work. Amesbury must also undertake an alcohol monitoring programme, go on an anger management course, and carry out 20 days of rehabilitation work.
Was Amesbury out of order, absolutely. Is he a danger to the wider society, if he’s never been in trouble before and this is a 1 off I’d argue he isn’t, especially given the rehabilitative measures in the sentence.
Does Amesbury deserve to lose his job - absolutely. Is he fit to be an MP, in my opinion the answer is noand he’s not the only one.
I hope the citizens in his constituency boot him out at the first available opportunity. | | | |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 19:14 - Feb 27 with 135 views | raynor94 |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 19:07 - Feb 27 by majorraglan |
The judge who initially sentenced Amesbury was a deputy district judge and junior to the judge who reviewed the sentence today. There’s no doubt Amesbury deserved a stretch, but I was surprised given the fact we’re releasing people early he didn’t get a suspended sentence.
There’s judge hearing the case today was sitting with two magistrates at Crown Court and he also ordered Amesbury to carry out 200 hours of unpaid work. Amesbury must also undertake an alcohol monitoring programme, go on an anger management course, and carry out 20 days of rehabilitation work.
Was Amesbury out of order, absolutely. Is he a danger to the wider society, if he’s never been in trouble before and this is a 1 off I’d argue he isn’t, especially given the rehabilitative measures in the sentence.
Does Amesbury deserve to lose his job - absolutely. Is he fit to be an MP, in my opinion the answer is noand he’s not the only one.
I hope the citizens in his constituency boot him out at the first available opportunity. |
That's different to your opening post, the message sent out has now been silenced.
He hasn't had the decency to resign, so as you say hopefully his constituents will kick him out | |
| |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 19:42 - Feb 27 with 95 views | Whiterockin |
| Mike Amesbury jail sentence on 17:04 - Feb 27 by AnotherJohn |
Not really my field, but as far as I can see there are two options for a victim who feels the sentence was too lenient, or that the outcome has not compensated for the harm done..
1. Unduly Lenient Sentence Scheme. “Under the extended scheme, victims will be given the power to challenge the sentences of a wider range of crimes in circumstances where they, or the public (those unconnected to the case), believe a punishment to be too lenient. (…) The ULS scheme permits prosecutors, victims, their families and the public to make an application to the Attorney General to review a sentence that they believe to be too low. Only one request need be lodged, which must be done within 28 days of the court hearing taking place.”
2. Civil case. Certainly possible but centres on a claim for compensation for harm done (whether physical or psychological) and so is about monetary damages rather than a harsher sentence. There are a few options here:
https://prettys.co.uk/articles/compensation-for-criminal-acts-can-i-make-a-claim |
Thank you. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
