By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Keith provided a link for this guy on the Manchester Airport thread, he's interesting in that as a barrister he fully aware of what he can say and often has a real insight into how things are in society as well as the law, Here he is on politics today:
The Black Belt Barrister on 19:04 - Dec 20 by KeithHaynes
Decent guy has politics that would appeal to many.
Or maybe the reason why Labour are trying to call off the council elections, he knows what damage Reform would do.
Quite like his notion that if political parties keep making clear and ambiguous statements on a particular policy such as the WASPI women and then suddenly change their mind then the WASPI women could have a case in law. That would stop some of the political lies!
The Black Belt Barrister on 19:10 - Dec 20 by JACKMANANDBOY
Quite like his notion that if political parties keep making clear and ambiguous statements on a particular policy such as the WASPI women and then suddenly change their mind then the WASPI women could have a case in law. That would stop some of the political lies!
It’s one of the many issues with party politics.
A number of individual Labour now MPs came out in support of WASPI but it wasn’t in the manifesto the party was elected on.
Personally in not in support of it so I’m ok with the party decision.
0
The Black Belt Barrister on 20:32 - Dec 20 with 189 views
The Black Belt Barrister on 19:42 - Dec 20 by Gwyn737
It’s one of the many issues with party politics.
A number of individual Labour now MPs came out in support of WASPI but it wasn’t in the manifesto the party was elected on.
Personally in not in support of it so I’m ok with the party decision.
Only a year ago Starmer was stating they would support the Waspi cause and was pictured with flags, placards etc stating it. You can’t support that lack of integrity in any form.
A great believer in taking anything you like to wherever you want to.
The Black Belt Barrister on 21:19 - Dec 20 by KeithHaynes
Only a year ago Starmer was stating they would support the Waspi cause and was pictured with flags, placards etc stating it. You can’t support that lack of integrity in any form.
I thought he was the right man for leader of labour party, but that soon diminished I didn't and still haven't got ant faith in him whatsoever.
The Black Belt Barrister on 21:19 - Dec 20 by KeithHaynes
Only a year ago Starmer was stating they would support the Waspi cause and was pictured with flags, placards etc stating it. You can’t support that lack of integrity in any form.
I agree, it’s bad.
But it wasn’t in the manifesto where party takes precedence. Not saying i think it’s ok.
Unfortunately being in opposition means you can promise whatever you like. Look at what Reform are doing.
0
The Black Belt Barrister on 21:48 - Dec 20 with 100 views
The Black Belt Barrister on 19:42 - Dec 20 by Gwyn737
It’s one of the many issues with party politics.
A number of individual Labour now MPs came out in support of WASPI but it wasn’t in the manifesto the party was elected on.
Personally in not in support of it so I’m ok with the party decision.
You are one of a few on here, who seem to have a problem with the older generation, irrespective if it was in the manifesto, all the now Labour front benches were more than happy to back the Waspi Women.
Starmer Reeves and the rest have really plummed the depths since being elected
You give it out, you take it back it`s all part of the game
The Black Belt Barrister on 21:41 - Dec 20 by Gwyn737
I agree, it’s bad.
But it wasn’t in the manifesto where party takes precedence. Not saying i think it’s ok.
Unfortunately being in opposition means you can promise whatever you like. Look at what Reform are doing.
In the attached video the barrister suggests that clear and much repeated promises could have legal value. If that was the case then that may curtail all the lying and false promises. I guess if you say it enough even though it's not in your manifesto it could constitute a commitment, it would have to be tested in court.
The Black Belt Barrister on 22:47 - Dec 20 by JACKMANANDBOY
In the attached video the barrister suggests that clear and much repeated promises could have legal value. If that was the case then that may curtail all the lying and false promises. I guess if you say it enough even though it's not in your manifesto it could constitute a commitment, it would have to be tested in court.
If that’s right I wonder why it’s not been tested before 🤷🏻
0
The Black Belt Barrister on 22:50 - Dec 20 with 47 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.