| SCFC2 21:33 - Oct 17 with 1948 views | KeithHaynes |
Well, it does make you laugh when people just disagree with no foundation to back up what they are saying.
Obviously always respect opinions when they provide examples, Andrew North Hill an example with generic statements, shame, he was not always like that. (amended) And Mark from London, I have to say if you haven’t got the ability to read and understand that something is happening, then the only loser is you. Intelligent responses with an effective reply seem to be unavailable.
Mentions of click bait ? This forum offers very little in financial support for our work or awareness of the Brain Tumour Charity. That’s another generic response from the majority of people with pseudonyms.
Azzuri Swan ?
Fancy commenting 😂 You didn’t on here. And we opened up the report thread for everyone. Two way street are opinions.
https://www.scfc2.co.uk/forum/d/7403-very-interesting-
I will also add we have no issue with any website opening up a discussion such as this, fill your boots. We have no right of reply on there, so here it is 👍
Up front.
We are always open to dialogue, Whats App UK : 07922 565473.
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| SCFC2 on 09:16 - Oct 18 with 1628 views | onehunglow |
Too much for me
This is my home after being ejected for life
Peace and love |  |
| |
| SCFC2 on 10:58 - Oct 18 with 1505 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
I was banned from SCFC2 a few years back having argued the Trust should sell all of their shares after 2015. I told them the Trust were taking a big chance. I also argued against legal action they should agree the offer made.
At the time of the vote I gave arguments against it. As it was a
n alternative view that could influence voters I was booted off. site despite not having broken any rules.
Colin (Swansea) threatened the owner Duncan that if I was not banned he a a few others would leave for PS. He folded like a pack of cards.
One party states always do badly because they do not debate and consider options. [Post edited 18 Oct 11:14]
|  |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| SCFC2 on 11:06 - Oct 18 with 1486 views | KeithHaynes |
| SCFC2 on 10:58 - Oct 18 by ReslovenSwan1 |
I was banned from SCFC2 a few years back having argued the Trust should sell all of their shares after 2015. I told them the Trust were taking a big chance. I also argued against legal action they should agree the offer made.
At the time of the vote I gave arguments against it. As it was a
n alternative view that could influence voters I was booted off. site despite not having broken any rules.
Colin (Swansea) threatened the owner Duncan that if I was not banned he a a few others would leave for PS. He folded like a pack of cards.
One party states always do badly because they do not debate and consider options. [Post edited 18 Oct 11:14]
|
Well, discussion and opinion generally on here won’t get a ban.
It’s a shame that a few posters on our rival sites at times don’t foresee how ridiculous they are sounding. All pseudonyms mind. Maybe their lives are just dull, or they’ve gotten away with it for so long it’s normalised behaviour.
Sums them up.
I’ll leave this on here for a day or so and then remove it if I don’t hear from any of these individuals. But we will always stand our ground when it comes to abuse. | |
| |
| SCFC2 on 14:11 - Oct 18 with 1163 views | onehunglow |
| SCFC2 on 11:06 - Oct 18 by KeithHaynes |
Well, discussion and opinion generally on here won’t get a ban.
It’s a shame that a few posters on our rival sites at times don’t foresee how ridiculous they are sounding. All pseudonyms mind. Maybe their lives are just dull, or they’ve gotten away with it for so long it’s normalised behaviour.
Sums them up.
I’ll leave this on here for a day or so and then remove it if I don’t hear from any of these individuals. But we will always stand our ground when it comes to abuse. |
We are a modest sized club with a fan base that has shrank dramatically in a short time .
Welsh people ,however,have a marked trait in bitching ,gossiping and back stabbing evident in the manner in which the club was sold on.
This,to me,was what the Trust was all about,ie,to protect the club from ourselves .
Little seems to have changed .
I doubt they is a more disparate group of fans .
We ,as fans, lost our club as we took our eye off the ball ,ignoring the jerks and prefering to fight each other .
The crap I had on PS was breathtaking . One luminary who did “ the hard miles” was more interested in looking for a physical confrontation or a meet.
I did meet him,prearranged and had a pleasantish chat .
Nobody has ever given me crap to my face
Sadly,the net and these forums give ,as Keith says, the balls to shoot shyte from behind a keyboard l | |
| |
| SCFC2 on 14:22 - Oct 18 with 1156 views | KeithHaynes |
| SCFC2 on 14:11 - Oct 18 by onehunglow |
We are a modest sized club with a fan base that has shrank dramatically in a short time .
Welsh people ,however,have a marked trait in bitching ,gossiping and back stabbing evident in the manner in which the club was sold on.
This,to me,was what the Trust was all about,ie,to protect the club from ourselves .
Little seems to have changed .
I doubt they is a more disparate group of fans .
We ,as fans, lost our club as we took our eye off the ball ,ignoring the jerks and prefering to fight each other .
The crap I had on PS was breathtaking . One luminary who did “ the hard miles” was more interested in looking for a physical confrontation or a meet.
I did meet him,prearranged and had a pleasantish chat .
Nobody has ever given me crap to my face
Sadly,the net and these forums give ,as Keith says, the balls to shoot shyte from behind a keyboard l |
Can always field grievances such as this which oddly are identical to two what’s app groups we have access to and are sent screenshots regularly. It is odd, but a small handful of people can have such a vested interest in our site with animosity. And yet I don’t know them, and doubt very much they will ever avail themselves to me.
I can only put it down to an extreme dislike of well researched reports, or a form of jealousy they either can’t comprehend what is being said or looking for some online bother.
Thanks to those who made us aware of this nonsense.
No calls yet 😂
This post has been edited by an administrator | |
| |
| SCFC2 on 15:56 - Oct 18 with 1004 views | onehunglow |
| SCFC2 on 14:22 - Oct 18 by KeithHaynes |
Can always field grievances such as this which oddly are identical to two what’s app groups we have access to and are sent screenshots regularly. It is odd, but a small handful of people can have such a vested interest in our site with animosity. And yet I don’t know them, and doubt very much they will ever avail themselves to me.
I can only put it down to an extreme dislike of well researched reports, or a form of jealousy they either can’t comprehend what is being said or looking for some online bother.
Thanks to those who made us aware of this nonsense.
No calls yet 😂
This post has been edited by an administrator |
Well,it’s well over my head
You never really know people | |
| |
| SCFC2 on 16:32 - Oct 18 with 917 views | KeithHaynes |
Going to keep this here until it’s blatantly obvious there will be no phone call.
Possibly around 7
Mark in London 😂 Can’t separate an informative report highlighting the people behind the scenes for the information of others with less larger heads. And clearly hasn’t got the capacity to see or disseminate what is in front of him. Talking about sources and real information. Our writers know more about the Swans than he could write in two foot letters on the back of a postage stamp.
Donate him to Oxfam, just remember who started this BS.
Your BS.
07922 565473. | |
| |
| SCFC2 on 19:31 - Oct 18 with 606 views | KeithHaynes |
I rest my case. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
