| Annual set piece therapy – Analysis on 17:38 - Oct 11 with 2555 views | RsinWales |
Could someone email a link to this article to the club please. I am pretty limited in my tactical analysis, but even I can understand the key thoughts that Dan shares. His take chimes with my frustrated sense of 'there had to have been a better way to defend that' as I watched most of those goals go in!
I was right in front of that first Palace goal and there was an embarassment to how easily they scored it.
Great to have Dan and his brainpower on the site. Cheers. |  | |  |
| Annual set piece therapy – Analysis on 12:28 - Oct 12 with 1916 views | essextaxiboy |
Leave a fast non defensive minded player up the field , they wiil leave 2 back . We outnumber them , match up man to man and attack the ball , 1 player on the post to narrow the goal .
Zonal defending , playing out EVERY time , inverted full backs , all bollox IMO . |  | | |
| Annual set piece therapy – Analysis on 14:19 - Oct 12 with 1835 views | Burnleyhoop |
We’re weak as piss. Not rocket science as it’s been obvious for weeks.
Your in depth analysis just confirms what we all knew. Good work nonetheless.
Question is, will the players we have at our disposal be able to do anything about it? Not sure changes in tactics will make the slightest difference with the same line up used against Derby. | | | |
| Annual set piece therapy – Analysis on 11:44 - Oct 13 with 1377 views | stevec |
Good analysis.
I’ve created a mathematical theorem that might help Marti overcome this issue;
(Madsen x 1) + (tiny tots x Y) = X
Whereby the increasing sum of X equals ever increasing cataclysmic defeat.
Y = number of tiny tots on the pitch at any one time.
Absolutely fool proof and simple data for the owners to digest. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
