Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Just for controversial... 02:04 - Sep 29 with 2609 viewsDJack

everyone else please keep away to stop it getting locked.

I kept my end are you going to admit defeat?


It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan

0
Just for controversial... on 18:13 - Oct 7 with 659 viewscontroversial_jack

Just for controversial... on 17:29 - Oct 7 by felixstowe_jack

As an old Russian saying goes their is no truth in pravda and no new in izvestia.

One is owned by the Russian government the other by the Russian communist party.


Once again, the source was from the US. Yes Pravda is owned by the communist party, which isn't the govt. Pravda ru is privately owned
0
Just for controversial... on 20:25 - Oct 7 with 595 viewsSullutaCreturned

Just for controversial... on 21:16 - Oct 2 by controversial_jack

I didn't realise the US govt weren't yanks. The image came from one of the objects orbiting the planet


Oh stop being obtuse. The satellite image, did it come from a USA satellite, where did the radio station say it came from...then, it was an image that you haven't seen because it was the radio, where is this image available?

The radio station can be funded by the USa but that doesn't make it an official government source.

The strange thing is, when I search for this I find plenty of evidence FOR the strike but NOTHING that says it wasn't succesful. Even earthquake monitoring stations picked up the very large explosion and thought it was a small earthquake.
0
Just for controversial... on 21:41 - Oct 7 with 560 viewscontroversial_jack

Just for controversial... on 20:25 - Oct 7 by SullutaCreturned

Oh stop being obtuse. The satellite image, did it come from a USA satellite, where did the radio station say it came from...then, it was an image that you haven't seen because it was the radio, where is this image available?

The radio station can be funded by the USa but that doesn't make it an official government source.

The strange thing is, when I search for this I find plenty of evidence FOR the strike but NOTHING that says it wasn't succesful. Even earthquake monitoring stations picked up the very large explosion and thought it was a small earthquake.


Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) is an American government-funded international media organization that broadcasts and reports news, information, and analyses to Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Caucasus, and the Middle East. RFE/RL is a private 501(c)(3) corporation and is supervised by the U.S. Agency for Global Media, an independent government agency overseeing all international broadcasting services that receive American government support.
0
Just for controversial... on 20:57 - Oct 8 with 474 viewsSullutaCreturned

Just for controversial... on 21:41 - Oct 7 by controversial_jack

Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL) is an American government-funded international media organization that broadcasts and reports news, information, and analyses to Eastern Europe, Central Asia, the Caucasus, and the Middle East. RFE/RL is a private 501(c)(3) corporation and is supervised by the U.S. Agency for Global Media, an independent government agency overseeing all international broadcasting services that receive American government support.


Yes and NONE of that makes it an official US government source. Did anybody from the White House make an official statement saying what you have suggested?

Has anybody else suggested the strike by Ukraine missed? Any evidence at all, besides all the evidence that says they did blow up the ammo dump.

forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/09/21/ukrainian-drones-just-blew-up-2000-tons-of-ammo-in-southern-russia/

reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-targets-western-russian-regions-with-drones-russian-officials-says-2024-09-18/

lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/09/18/ukraine-destroys-huge-russian-ammunition-depot-with-first-of-its-kind-ground-breaking-innovative-missiles_6726538_4.html

nbcnews.com/news/world/ukraine-drone-attack-russia-ammo-depot-toropets-tver-blasts-quake-fire-rcna171601
0
Just for controversial... on 09:11 - Oct 9 with 436 viewscontroversial_jack

Just for controversial... on 20:57 - Oct 8 by SullutaCreturned

Yes and NONE of that makes it an official US government source. Did anybody from the White House make an official statement saying what you have suggested?

Has anybody else suggested the strike by Ukraine missed? Any evidence at all, besides all the evidence that says they did blow up the ammo dump.

forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2024/09/21/ukrainian-drones-just-blew-up-2000-tons-of-ammo-in-southern-russia/

reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-targets-western-russian-regions-with-drones-russian-officials-says-2024-09-18/

lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2024/09/18/ukraine-destroys-huge-russian-ammunition-depot-with-first-of-its-kind-ground-breaking-innovative-missiles_6726538_4.html

nbcnews.com/news/world/ukraine-drone-attack-russia-ammo-depot-toropets-tver-blasts-quake-fire-rcna171601


I wouldn't trust those links you just gave, because they aren't official govt sources.
0
Just for controversial... on 15:42 - Oct 9 with 405 viewsSullutaCreturned

Just for controversial... on 09:11 - Oct 9 by controversial_jack

I wouldn't trust those links you just gave, because they aren't official govt sources.


But I never claimed that a country had debunked the story, you said the yanks had but it wasn't the yanks, it was a radio statiion.

In which case, taking the unofficial sources into account, you have provided one source whereas I have provided more.

You really should be more careful with your choice of words.
0
Just for controversial... on 10:04 - Oct 10 with 366 viewscontroversial_jack

Just for controversial... on 15:42 - Oct 9 by SullutaCreturned

But I never claimed that a country had debunked the story, you said the yanks had but it wasn't the yanks, it was a radio statiion.

In which case, taking the unofficial sources into account, you have provided one source whereas I have provided more.

You really should be more careful with your choice of words.


We will never get the reality from any official govt source. They have their agenda, whichever side they are supporting at the time. I prefer to dig deeper. Many others are just happy to be spoon fed what they want to hear
0
Just for controversial... on 20:43 - Oct 10 with 287 viewsSullutaCreturned

Just for controversial... on 10:04 - Oct 10 by controversial_jack

We will never get the reality from any official govt source. They have their agenda, whichever side they are supporting at the time. I prefer to dig deeper. Many others are just happy to be spoon fed what they want to hear


DFig deeper you say, a radio station and Pravda, you don't get spoon fed at all eh
0
Login to get fewer ads

Just for controversial... on 22:47 - Oct 10 with 264 viewscontroversial_jack

Just for controversial... on 20:43 - Oct 10 by SullutaCreturned

DFig deeper you say, a radio station and Pravda, you don't get spoon fed at all eh


You didn't know about them until i educated you. It was BBC and Fox news for you
0
Just for controversial... on 16:25 - Oct 11 with 201 viewsSullutaCreturned

Just for controversial... on 22:47 - Oct 10 by controversial_jack

You didn't know about them until i educated you. It was BBC and Fox news for you


I didn't know, massive assumptiom there. You couldn't educate a primary school kid because education involves real facts and truths.

You believe Pravda but not the BBC, that says everything about you that anyone needs to know.
Every source has bias, question the BBC, question Pravda, question every source. The only thing you've dug deep is the hole you are in.
0
Just for controversial... on 17:06 - Oct 11 with 191 viewscontroversial_jack

Just for controversial... on 16:25 - Oct 11 by SullutaCreturned

I didn't know, massive assumptiom there. You couldn't educate a primary school kid because education involves real facts and truths.

You believe Pravda but not the BBC, that says everything about you that anyone needs to know.
Every source has bias, question the BBC, question Pravda, question every source. The only thing you've dug deep is the hole you are in.


You are correct, seems I have failed to educate you.

The BBC was good at one time, but not now.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024