Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
No court action? 15:20 - Feb 15 with 15114 viewsChief

https://www.swanseacity.com/news/swansea-city-club-statement-0

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

-1
No court action? on 15:30 - Feb 15 with 5387 viewsonehunglow

BUT,I was told it was imminent and I was dumb to even question it.

Apologies accepted then.

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
No court action? on 15:33 - Feb 15 with 5379 viewsReslovenSwan1

A 5% 'golden share' by the looks of it. 21% was always too high a share. The devil will be in the detail.

Wise sage since Toshack era

0
No court action? on 15:35 - Feb 15 with 5376 viewsKeithHaynes

Here we go 😂

A great believer in taking anything you like to wherever you want to.
Blog: Do you want to start a career in journalism ?

1
No court action? on 15:39 - Feb 15 with 5347 viewsChief

It's a terrible statement and it's shocking that the trust's statement is exactly the same.

Have the trust actually sold 16% or have just given up with just the 5% locked in?

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

-1
No court action? on 15:45 - Feb 15 with 5320 viewsjasper_T

No court action? on 15:39 - Feb 15 by Chief

It's a terrible statement and it's shocking that the trust's statement is exactly the same.

Have the trust actually sold 16% or have just given up with just the 5% locked in?


It means that however many new shares are generated when the loans are converted to equity/new investment made, the Trust's holding can't drop below 5% even if they never put another penny into the club.
0
No court action? on 15:45 - Feb 15 with 5311 viewsDr_Winston

No court action? on 15:39 - Feb 15 by Chief

It's a terrible statement and it's shocking that the trust's statement is exactly the same.

Have the trust actually sold 16% or have just given up with just the 5% locked in?


The Trust has guaranteed itself at least 5%. In theory the owners could have diluted their share level below that.

Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back.

0
No court action? on 15:50 - Feb 15 with 5298 viewsChief

Just seen the full statement.

Terrible. The members have been betrayed.

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

4
No court action? on 15:52 - Feb 15 with 5274 viewsunion_jack

No court action? on 15:50 - Feb 15 by Chief

Just seen the full statement.

Terrible. The members have been betrayed.


Not wishing to lock horns with you on another subject but taking it in face value, isn’t this the best solution? As Resloven says above though, the devil is in the detail.

Are Sperm Whales the reason the sea is so salty?
Poll: Bony - Would You Want Him Back?

1
Login to get fewer ads

No court action? on 15:53 - Feb 15 with 5278 viewsjasper_T

No court action? on 15:50 - Feb 15 by Chief

Just seen the full statement.

Terrible. The members have been betrayed.


How so?
0
No court action? on 15:56 - Feb 15 with 5264 viewsChief

No court action? on 15:53 - Feb 15 by jasper_T

How so?


The members voted for court action that could result in the sale of the shares.

Now that's not happening with no consultation with the members.

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

0
No court action? on 15:58 - Feb 15 with 5242 viewsChief

No court action? on 15:52 - Feb 15 by union_jack

Not wishing to lock horns with you on another subject but taking it in face value, isn’t this the best solution? As Resloven says above though, the devil is in the detail.


I don't see how. The trust have just given up a QC endorsed case that could result in at least £21mill windfall for 500% and 5% lock.

How can that be seen as good for the trust? What happens if the Americans sell, will the next owners respect the 5% lock?

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

-1
No court action? on 15:59 - Feb 15 with 5240 viewsjasper_T

No court action? on 15:56 - Feb 15 by Chief

The members voted for court action that could result in the sale of the shares.

Now that's not happening with no consultation with the members.


Does this statement preclude the sale of shares? Wasn't the main court action directed against the former owners rather than the club?
0
No court action? on 16:01 - Feb 15 with 5211 viewsvetchonian

5% shareholding is insignifciant..the Tust will not feature in any future ownership once this mob sell.
Also it will now never ahave sufficient funds to launch a resuce bid should the worst occur.

Intersting though the club managing this given the legal action was against the sellouts and buyers individuals not the club.....

I am saw this coming ...hence why I am no loinger a Trust memebr and wont be rejoining anytime soon

Poll: Will CCFC win a game this season?

5
No court action? on 16:02 - Feb 15 with 5205 viewsChief

No court action? on 15:59 - Feb 15 by jasper_T

Does this statement preclude the sale of shares? Wasn't the main court action directed against the former owners rather than the club?


It was never directed at the club. Proceedings were against the new and old owners and yes court action, it was told to the members if successful would probably result in the sale of all their shares at the premier league cost.

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

-1
No court action? on 16:05 - Feb 15 with 5180 viewsfelixstowe_jack

No court action? on 15:50 - Feb 15 by Chief

Just seen the full statement.

Terrible. The members have been betrayed.


The members have not been betrayed. It seems a sensible and fair solution which avoids any court action.

The Trust will shortly receive £0.5 million with a possible further £0.5 million for 3 seasons if the Club are promoted and stay in the PL for 3 seasons.


The Trust will hold 5% of the Club shares which cannot be further diluted.
The Trust will also hold 10% of the Club shares following the recent investment by our owners which was in the form of a convertible loan which will shortly be turned into new shares.

Clear people with better legal knowledge will know how fair the deal is to the Trust, the trust members, new shareholders and former share owners.

Poll: Sholud Wales rollout vaccination at full speed.

0
No court action? on 16:09 - Feb 15 with 5163 viewsChief

No court action? on 16:05 - Feb 15 by felixstowe_jack

The members have not been betrayed. It seems a sensible and fair solution which avoids any court action.

The Trust will shortly receive £0.5 million with a possible further £0.5 million for 3 seasons if the Club are promoted and stay in the PL for 3 seasons.


The Trust will hold 5% of the Club shares which cannot be further diluted.
The Trust will also hold 10% of the Club shares following the recent investment by our owners which was in the form of a convertible loan which will shortly be turned into new shares.

Clear people with better legal knowledge will know how fair the deal is to the Trust, the trust members, new shareholders and former share owners.


The members voted for court action.

That's no longer happening through the choice of the trust board and yet the members received no consultation of this change of plan.

Imagine Tory's decided not proceed with brexit and didn't bother telling the electorate despite the democratic vote.

It's the very epitome of a betrayal.

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

1
No court action? on 16:10 - Feb 15 with 5161 viewsfelixstowe_jack

No court action? on 15:56 - Feb 15 by Chief

The members voted for court action that could result in the sale of the shares.

Now that's not happening with no consultation with the members.


The members, me included, voted for legal action if NO OFFERS WERE MADE BY THE CLUB TO COMPENSATE THE TRUST.

Clearly the Club has now made a formal offer so it there a need to pursue legal action?
[Post edited 15 Feb 2022 16:14]

Poll: Sholud Wales rollout vaccination at full speed.

0
No court action? on 16:15 - Feb 15 with 5132 viewsChief

No court action? on 16:10 - Feb 15 by felixstowe_jack

The members, me included, voted for legal action if NO OFFERS WERE MADE BY THE CLUB TO COMPENSATE THE TRUST.

Clearly the Club has now made a formal offer so it there a need to pursue legal action?
[Post edited 15 Feb 2022 16:14]


This is no offer that adequately compensates the trust in anyway.

Essentially sold 10% for 500k. Laughable.

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

0
No court action? on 16:16 - Feb 15 with 5115 viewsfelixstowe_jack

No court action? on 16:09 - Feb 15 by Chief

The members voted for court action.

That's no longer happening through the choice of the trust board and yet the members received no consultation of this change of plan.

Imagine Tory's decided not proceed with brexit and didn't bother telling the electorate despite the democratic vote.

It's the very epitome of a betrayal.


Read my previous reply.

The trust members voted for legal action if no offer was made from the club.
Clearly the Club have made an offer so why proceed with legal action.

Poll: Sholud Wales rollout vaccination at full speed.

0
No court action? on 16:18 - Feb 15 with 5105 viewsfelixstowe_jack

No court action? on 16:15 - Feb 15 by Chief

This is no offer that adequately compensates the trust in anyway.

Essentially sold 10% for 500k. Laughable.


The trust have not sold any shares where did you get that nonsense from.

Poll: Sholud Wales rollout vaccination at full speed.

0
No court action? on 16:18 - Feb 15 with 5105 viewsChief

No court action? on 16:16 - Feb 15 by felixstowe_jack

Read my previous reply.

The trust members voted for legal action if no offer was made from the club.
Clearly the Club have made an offer so why proceed with legal action.


So by that logic the Americans could have offered a quid and that automatically means the trust dropping the case?

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

-1
No court action? on 16:19 - Feb 15 with 5099 viewspencoedjack

I didn't even know the trust still existed.

Haven't received any correspondence from them for months.
0
No court action? on 16:22 - Feb 15 with 5079 viewsChief

No court action? on 16:19 - Feb 15 by pencoedjack

I didn't even know the trust still existed.

Haven't received any correspondence from them for months.


Now we know why!

Poll: Rate the ref's performance today

-1
No court action? on 16:22 - Feb 15 with 5074 viewsonehunglow

No court action? on 16:19 - Feb 15 by pencoedjack

I didn't even know the trust still existed.

Haven't received any correspondence from them for months.


It’s a shame the need was felt to have any Trust whatsoever.
It is all about these cretinous owners and somehow finding new ones that give a monkeys .

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
No court action? on 16:22 - Feb 15 with 5076 viewsfelixstowe_jack

No court action? on 16:18 - Feb 15 by Chief

So by that logic the Americans could have offered a quid and that automatically means the trust dropping the case?


The Americans have not offered a £ have they.
They trust are keeping all their shares.

The trust shareholdings are being diluted because of NEW investment by the Americans. Something our supporters have been calling for over tye last few years since they took over.

Poll: Sholud Wales rollout vaccination at full speed.

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024