| Booster jab 11:20 - Sep 19 with 1975 views | CountyJim |
Got mine tomorrow bit worried because I wasn't well after my second dose in march
Edit that second dose was end of February [Post edited 19 Sep 2021 11:25]
|  | | |  |
| Booster jab on 12:02 - Sep 21 with 460 views | RonaldStump |
| Booster jab on 18:48 - Sep 19 by Sirjohnalot |
I live here, a lot of Mancs won’t put up with these idiots |
Clearly they do because they did nothing about it.
And who are you to call people idiots because they have a different opinion to you.
It's that attitude that starts war's and trust me there is one coming. |  |
| |
| Booster jab on 12:08 - Sep 21 with 453 views | ItchySphincter |
You’ll be fine. Get on with it you big girls blouse. A couple of Ibuprofen will sort you out. |  |
| |
| Booster jab on 12:26 - Sep 21 with 445 views | pencoedjack |
| Booster jab on 17:19 - Sep 19 by onehunglow |
Today in Mancheter ,Police are dealing with demos with anti vaxxers and the public clashing.
Why would anyone actively promote Not ensuring you catch a virus that can kill easily. |
Its about time BOJO got the water cannons out on these unwashed scruffy protesters whether it be vaccines or saving the planet.
Proper hard working people need to earn a living, people need to get to hospitals, delivery drivers need to deliver urgent medical supplies & these scrouts are disrupting it.
Personally Id chuck them all in jail. |  | | |
| Booster jab on 12:35 - Sep 21 with 432 views | RonaldStump |
| Booster jab on 12:26 - Sep 21 by pencoedjack |
Its about time BOJO got the water cannons out on these unwashed scruffy protesters whether it be vaccines or saving the planet.
Proper hard working people need to earn a living, people need to get to hospitals, delivery drivers need to deliver urgent medical supplies & these scrouts are disrupting it.
Personally Id chuck them all in jail. |
Maybe they are just standing up for their rights and don't want to be forced into a taking the poison or lose their job scenario, easy for a numpty like you to have a pop when it doesn't effect you eh!!
As for those save the planet extension rebellion clockwombles I totally agree [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 12:36]
| |
| |
| Booster jab on 13:05 - Sep 21 with 415 views | RonaldStump |
| Booster jab on 12:46 - Sep 19 by onehunglow |
I’ve been jabbed as have all my family. Been flu jabbed too.
We love it. |
A panel of experts from the US FDA has overwhelmingly rejected an application for approval of Pfizer's corona booster vaccination, expressing doubts about its safety. During his presentation to the panel, lead coronavirus researcher Steve Kirsch stated that "Pfizer's vaccine kills more people than it saves".
https://de.rt.com/nordamerika/124350-fuhrender-us-corona-forscher-pfizer/ | |
| |
| Booster jab on 13:09 - Sep 21 with 414 views | felixstowe_jack |
| Booster jab on 13:05 - Sep 21 by RonaldStump |
A panel of experts from the US FDA has overwhelmingly rejected an application for approval of Pfizer's corona booster vaccination, expressing doubts about its safety. During his presentation to the panel, lead coronavirus researcher Steve Kirsch stated that "Pfizer's vaccine kills more people than it saves".
https://de.rt.com/nordamerika/124350-fuhrender-us-corona-forscher-pfizer/ |
Get vaccinated you know it makes sense. | |
| |
| Booster jab on 13:24 - Sep 21 with 407 views | Scotia |
| Booster jab on 13:05 - Sep 21 by RonaldStump |
A panel of experts from the US FDA has overwhelmingly rejected an application for approval of Pfizer's corona booster vaccination, expressing doubts about its safety. During his presentation to the panel, lead coronavirus researcher Steve Kirsch stated that "Pfizer's vaccine kills more people than it saves".
https://de.rt.com/nordamerika/124350-fuhrender-us-corona-forscher-pfizer/ |
Lead coronavirus researcher Steve Kirsch, are you sure or are you gullibly believing everything you read on social media again Ronald?
He's an IT entrepreneur. | | | |
| Booster jab on 13:32 - Sep 21 with 399 views | pencoedjack |
| Booster jab on 12:35 - Sep 21 by RonaldStump |
Maybe they are just standing up for their rights and don't want to be forced into a taking the poison or lose their job scenario, easy for a numpty like you to have a pop when it doesn't effect you eh!!
As for those save the planet extension rebellion clockwombles I totally agree [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 12:36]
|
Let’s hope a 7 year old girl doesn’t miss her cancer appointment as happened with the scrouts blocking roads in London.
Numpties the lot of them. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Booster jab on 13:38 - Sep 21 with 384 views | RonaldStump |
| Booster jab on 13:32 - Sep 21 by pencoedjack |
Let’s hope a 7 year old girl doesn’t miss her cancer appointment as happened with the scrouts blocking roads in London.
Numpties the lot of them. |
Anybody that blocks the roads preventing emergency services from getting through, deserve a lorry steaming through them at high speed. jail would be too good for them. | |
| |
| Booster jab on 14:13 - Sep 21 with 371 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Booster jab on 13:24 - Sep 21 by Scotia |
Lead coronavirus researcher Steve Kirsch, are you sure or are you gullibly believing everything you read on social media again Ronald?
He's an IT entrepreneur. |
When will you realise that literally anybody can do research.
You use it as an excuse to not believe information provided by anyody you deem unacceptable.
Failing to realise that Investigative Journalism has always found infromation that main stream media does not.
When researching a subject you only need to ask "experts" in that subject for their information and explanation.
So stop using as an excuse and refute the actual dat that they provide. [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 14:14]
| | | |
| Booster jab on 14:18 - Sep 21 with 372 views | CountyJim |
| Booster jab on 13:05 - Sep 21 by RonaldStump |
A panel of experts from the US FDA has overwhelmingly rejected an application for approval of Pfizer's corona booster vaccination, expressing doubts about its safety. During his presentation to the panel, lead coronavirus researcher Steve Kirsch stated that "Pfizer's vaccine kills more people than it saves".
https://de.rt.com/nordamerika/124350-fuhrender-us-corona-forscher-pfizer/ |
There's always a risk
Thousands of people a day have operations a tiny amount of those will die on the table do people stop having operations | | | |
| Booster jab on 14:50 - Sep 21 with 358 views | Scotia |
| Booster jab on 14:13 - Sep 21 by A_Fans_Dad |
When will you realise that literally anybody can do research.
You use it as an excuse to not believe information provided by anyody you deem unacceptable.
Failing to realise that Investigative Journalism has always found infromation that main stream media does not.
When researching a subject you only need to ask "experts" in that subject for their information and explanation.
So stop using as an excuse and refute the actual dat that they provide. [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 14:14]
|
Anybody can do research. Understanding what they find is a very different matter, as you so capably demonstrate. | | | |
| Booster jab on 15:11 - Sep 21 with 342 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Booster jab on 14:18 - Sep 21 by CountyJim |
There's always a risk
Thousands of people a day have operations a tiny amount of those will die on the table do people stop having operations |
That has actually happened when a particular hospital has way above average fatalities. or very adverse outcomes
That hospital does get stopped from performing the operations or procedures until an investigation and corrective actions have taken place. | | | |
| Booster jab on 15:13 - Sep 21 with 339 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Booster jab on 14:50 - Sep 21 by Scotia |
Anybody can do research. Understanding what they find is a very different matter, as you so capably demonstrate. |
Not as much as you, who does not even know how to do the research in the first place and believes everything you are told to believe. | | | |
| Booster jab on 15:37 - Sep 21 with 332 views | Scotia |
| Booster jab on 15:13 - Sep 21 by A_Fans_Dad |
Not as much as you, who does not even know how to do the research in the first place and believes everything you are told to believe. |
Stop being so immature.
The fact that you consider what you do research is laughable. It's the kind of project work that a 12 year old would do on google, although less objective.
I don't "research" covid, I read about covid. Objectively I might add. That's largely what you do ,but you already know what you want to be told.
Need I remind you of the list of names you blindly posted, who invented mRNA vaccines? who "Dr Mike Williams" is? Maisy Evans?
If you questioned what you read rather than blindly believe crazy conspiracy websites you'd be a happier and healthier man. and you'd post less rubbish on here. | | | |
| Booster jab on 16:11 - Sep 21 with 319 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Booster jab on 15:37 - Sep 21 by Scotia |
Stop being so immature.
The fact that you consider what you do research is laughable. It's the kind of project work that a 12 year old would do on google, although less objective.
I don't "research" covid, I read about covid. Objectively I might add. That's largely what you do ,but you already know what you want to be told.
Need I remind you of the list of names you blindly posted, who invented mRNA vaccines? who "Dr Mike Williams" is? Maisy Evans?
If you questioned what you read rather than blindly believe crazy conspiracy websites you'd be a happier and healthier man. and you'd post less rubbish on here. |
"I don't "research" covid, I read about covid. Objectively I might add"
Says the guy who can't even understand a clinical study and can only "read" the summary.
Who can't tell the difference between 3 dead bodies and 6 dead bodies. Who thinks they are by some magic statistics equal.
Who couldn't understand NASA/GISS temperature data and doesn't understand anything that involves numbers, charts and statistics.
So yes you read "about" it all right without a shred of analytical thinking. | | | |
| Booster jab on 16:56 - Sep 21 with 313 views | felixstowe_jack |
| Booster jab on 16:11 - Sep 21 by A_Fans_Dad |
"I don't "research" covid, I read about covid. Objectively I might add"
Says the guy who can't even understand a clinical study and can only "read" the summary.
Who can't tell the difference between 3 dead bodies and 6 dead bodies. Who thinks they are by some magic statistics equal.
Who couldn't understand NASA/GISS temperature data and doesn't understand anything that involves numbers, charts and statistics.
So yes you read "about" it all right without a shred of analytical thinking. |
Just get vaccinated you know it makes sense. | |
| |
| Booster jab on 16:59 - Sep 21 with 310 views | Professor |
| Booster jab on 16:11 - Sep 21 by A_Fans_Dad |
"I don't "research" covid, I read about covid. Objectively I might add"
Says the guy who can't even understand a clinical study and can only "read" the summary.
Who can't tell the difference between 3 dead bodies and 6 dead bodies. Who thinks they are by some magic statistics equal.
Who couldn't understand NASA/GISS temperature data and doesn't understand anything that involves numbers, charts and statistics.
So yes you read "about" it all right without a shred of analytical thinking. |
No you don’t. You are one of the least objective when looking at data.
You discount work as you claim it’s wrong.
Not least REVOVERY, but as far as I am aware you have no training in phamacology or infectious disease therapeutics or pharmacokinetics to understand why the dose regimen was chosen.
You look at figures but don’t understand what they refer to.
Analysis is just part of research. Good experimental or trial design is another. As is recognising limitations. You are not in the least objective here.
You bring up the same argument,
Yet the authors conclusions are completely opposite.
Why?
Because they understand what it means. Looking at data and associations throws up anomalies.
Understanding these is pretty important. Understanding which analyses are important. It’s
Not done on an Excel spreadsheet. Most science is now collaborative as no one has the expertise alone for the depth of current studies. Few people have much concept of what research from basic,
to application or translational and on to a clinical setting involves. Hence you are in fact extremely subjective in what you write. | | | |
| Booster jab on 17:29 - Sep 21 with 301 views | A_Fans_Dad |
| Booster jab on 16:59 - Sep 21 by Professor |
No you don’t. You are one of the least objective when looking at data.
You discount work as you claim it’s wrong.
Not least REVOVERY, but as far as I am aware you have no training in phamacology or infectious disease therapeutics or pharmacokinetics to understand why the dose regimen was chosen.
You look at figures but don’t understand what they refer to.
Analysis is just part of research. Good experimental or trial design is another. As is recognising limitations. You are not in the least objective here.
You bring up the same argument,
Yet the authors conclusions are completely opposite.
Why?
Because they understand what it means. Looking at data and associations throws up anomalies.
Understanding these is pretty important. Understanding which analyses are important. It’s
Not done on an Excel spreadsheet. Most science is now collaborative as no one has the expertise alone for the depth of current studies. Few people have much concept of what research from basic,
to application or translational and on to a clinical setting involves. Hence you are in fact extremely subjective in what you write. |
You suggest that studies are never wrong and never completely biased.
Which we all know from recent events is complete and utter crap.
So called scientists have been caught making up data and not including all the data that doesn't fit their narrative.
I posted some time ago the discussion between 3 scientists discussing how disgraceful peer reviewed studies had become.
I pointed out just the other day that the Pfizer study on Pregnant women was found wrong and had to be adjusted.
It wasn't me that pointed out that the WHO, Brazilian and RECOVERY studies were using dangerously high doses it was doctors and [b/medical professionals and yet you critisize me for their clinical judgements.
"You look at figures but don’t understand what they refer to. "
What a load of bullshit, dead body counts are dead body counts, they do nt require further anaysis, if you don't agree with that then piss off. [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 17:30]
| | | |
| Booster jab on 17:47 - Sep 21 with 298 views | Treforys_Jack |
| Booster jab on 17:29 - Sep 21 by A_Fans_Dad |
You suggest that studies are never wrong and never completely biased.
Which we all know from recent events is complete and utter crap.
So called scientists have been caught making up data and not including all the data that doesn't fit their narrative.
I posted some time ago the discussion between 3 scientists discussing how disgraceful peer reviewed studies had become.
I pointed out just the other day that the Pfizer study on Pregnant women was found wrong and had to be adjusted.
It wasn't me that pointed out that the WHO, Brazilian and RECOVERY studies were using dangerously high doses it was doctors and [b/medical professionals and yet you critisize me for their clinical judgements.
"You look at figures but don’t understand what they refer to. "
What a load of bullshit, dead body counts are dead body counts, they do nt require further anaysis, if you don't agree with that then piss off. [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 17:30]
|
🤣🤣, my kind of summing up. [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 17:48]
|  | | |
| Booster jab on 17:57 - Sep 21 with 292 views | onehunglow |
| Booster jab on 17:29 - Sep 21 by A_Fans_Dad |
You suggest that studies are never wrong and never completely biased.
Which we all know from recent events is complete and utter crap.
So called scientists have been caught making up data and not including all the data that doesn't fit their narrative.
I posted some time ago the discussion between 3 scientists discussing how disgraceful peer reviewed studies had become.
I pointed out just the other day that the Pfizer study on Pregnant women was found wrong and had to be adjusted.
It wasn't me that pointed out that the WHO, Brazilian and RECOVERY studies were using dangerously high doses it was doctors and [b/medical professionals and yet you critisize me for their clinical judgements.
"You look at figures but don’t understand what they refer to. "
What a load of bullshit, dead body counts are dead body counts, they do nt require further anaysis, if you don't agree with that then piss off. [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 17:30]
|
You have been destroyed by the Professor .
NOW THEN
What should we do ? | |
| |
| Booster jab on 18:11 - Sep 21 with 287 views | Scotia |
| Booster jab on 16:11 - Sep 21 by A_Fans_Dad |
"I don't "research" covid, I read about covid. Objectively I might add"
Says the guy who can't even understand a clinical study and can only "read" the summary.
Who can't tell the difference between 3 dead bodies and 6 dead bodies. Who thinks they are by some magic statistics equal.
Who couldn't understand NASA/GISS temperature data and doesn't understand anything that involves numbers, charts and statistics.
So yes you read "about" it all right without a shred of analytical thinking. |
That's exactly the kind of research I am referring to.
To you it's just numbers. You don't even realise that understanding those numbers is more important. | | | |
| Booster jab on 18:14 - Sep 21 with 285 views | Professor |
| Booster jab on 17:29 - Sep 21 by A_Fans_Dad |
You suggest that studies are never wrong and never completely biased.
Which we all know from recent events is complete and utter crap.
So called scientists have been caught making up data and not including all the data that doesn't fit their narrative.
I posted some time ago the discussion between 3 scientists discussing how disgraceful peer reviewed studies had become.
I pointed out just the other day that the Pfizer study on Pregnant women was found wrong and had to be adjusted.
It wasn't me that pointed out that the WHO, Brazilian and RECOVERY studies were using dangerously high doses it was doctors and [b/medical professionals and yet you critisize me for their clinical judgements.
"You look at figures but don’t understand what they refer to. "
What a load of bullshit, dead body counts are dead body counts, they do nt require further anaysis, if you don't agree with that then piss off. [Post edited 21 Sep 2021 17:30]
|
When I suggested last year that there would be a huge wave of Covid studies, some good, some bad. Some flawed simply due to limitations and awful lot of ambulance chasing, hand waving work of dubious quality to simply ride a wave you roundly criticised me for suggesting that scientists and doctors could be fraudulent. That's a changed tune.
Peer review-yes it has issues, but there is no real alternative. You never suggest one. Just like the diagnostic test..
Ever peer reviewed either journal or grant applications? Ever been a journal editor? Sat on funding panel? Ever published a peer reviewed article?
I would note one of the biggest frauds was widely publicised study on Ivermectin efficacy.
So as I see it you are like someone who thinks they can manage in the PL by playing 'Football Manager' or can command an army from being in a Sealed Knot re-enactment group.
Do you not get that senior scientists have spent perhaps 20-30 years of training and getting experience before leading major projects?
You claim something because you read it on 'welovetrump.com' or somewhere else. Have you ever read the rationale of why the HCQ dose was used in the RECOVERY study? I think not.
Putting the claim of a few scientists as evidence is just opinion. Do you know how many people are employed in the Life Sciences sector in the UK?
It's around 500,000 and I would bet that in excess of 95% would agree what you spout is dangerous, ill-informed baloney.
I could go on. I used to do dramatics as a kid, but never saw myself on Broadway. Time to grow up and leave science to the pros I think. | | | |
| Booster jab on 18:32 - Sep 21 with 267 views | howenjack |
| Booster jab on 13:24 - Sep 21 by Scotia |
Lead coronavirus researcher Steve Kirsch, are you sure or are you gullibly believing everything you read on social media again Ronald?
He's an IT entrepreneur. |
Then why should we believe Bill Gates he's an IT entrepreneur, | | | |
| Booster jab on 18:50 - Sep 21 with 259 views | Catullus |
| Booster jab on 16:59 - Sep 21 by Professor |
No you don’t. You are one of the least objective when looking at data.
You discount work as you claim it’s wrong.
Not least REVOVERY, but as far as I am aware you have no training in phamacology or infectious disease therapeutics or pharmacokinetics to understand why the dose regimen was chosen.
You look at figures but don’t understand what they refer to.
Analysis is just part of research. Good experimental or trial design is another. As is recognising limitations. You are not in the least objective here.
You bring up the same argument,
Yet the authors conclusions are completely opposite.
Why?
Because they understand what it means. Looking at data and associations throws up anomalies.
Understanding these is pretty important. Understanding which analyses are important. It’s
Not done on an Excel spreadsheet. Most science is now collaborative as no one has the expertise alone for the depth of current studies. Few people have much concept of what research from basic,
to application or translational and on to a clinical setting involves. Hence you are in fact extremely subjective in what you write. |
That last paragraph, Prof, all I understand of it is how much I don't understand! Yet other complete amateurs think they know better. Crazy, it's a mad, mad, mad, mad world.
And then there's Stumpy the WUM. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
