Sign Ben Davies back 13:21 - Dec 12 with 3667 views | IeuanIvett98 | Agree? He's too good to be sitting on a bench in the PL, let's bring him back. Versatile for LB or CB. For me he's the number 1 signing id like to see in January | |
| | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 13:23 - Dec 12 with 2645 views | 34dfgdf54 | Definitely. He won't get a look in at Spurs unless Danny Rose gets injured / suspended. Never rated him as much as some on here due to his positioning etc, but going to Spurs has made him twice the player, looks that way watching him for Wales anyway. | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 13:24 - Dec 12 with 2645 views | E20Jack | I wouldn't go near Spurs at the moment, they clearly fancy having Gylfi back. Go in there enquiring about Ben and I wouldn't put it past us to end up swapping Gylfi for Ben and Tom Carroll. | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 13:25 - Dec 12 with 2634 views | jasper_T |
Sign Ben Davies back on 13:24 - Dec 12 by E20Jack | I wouldn't go near Spurs at the moment, they clearly fancy having Gylfi back. Go in there enquiring about Ben and I wouldn't put it past us to end up swapping Gylfi for Ben and Tom Carroll. |
Gylfi would have to be pretty desperate to go back there, they've got even more players for his position than when he left. Wouldn't read too much into Poch's comments the other day. | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 13:30 - Dec 12 with 2605 views | E20Jack | Although saying that, swap deals may be the only way to stop transfer money being swallwed down the big yank sinkhole. | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 13:53 - Dec 12 with 2503 views | tomdickharry | If he becomes available then we should make every effort to sign in January. | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 14:14 - Dec 12 with 2432 views | nice_to_michu | Be great for him and us if we got him on loan fir the rest of the season. | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 14:32 - Dec 12 with 2396 views | jacktar | Both Manchester clubs are interested in signing Rose (if you believe what you read on tinternet). If that is the case then we have no chance of getting Ben back here. I'm not sure he would want to anyway. | |
| We shouldn't all be tarred with the same brush you know! |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 16:32 - Dec 12 with 2227 views | Lohengrin | I've heard a whisper that Ben may be off to Chelsea in January. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Sign Ben Davies back on 17:22 - Dec 12 with 2102 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
Sign Ben Davies back on 16:32 - Dec 12 by Lohengrin | I've heard a whisper that Ben may be off to Chelsea in January. |
I've heard it's Rose off to Chelsea . Love to see him back , but why would he ? | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 17:29 - Dec 12 with 2088 views | airedale | I wouldn't be surprised if someone said that Rose was the best LB around the PL these days. | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 18:23 - Dec 12 with 1992 views | Dyfnant |
Sign Ben Davies back on 17:22 - Dec 12 by oh_tommy_tommy | I've heard it's Rose off to Chelsea . Love to see him back , but why would he ? |
Money. He loves it. | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 23:08 - Dec 12 with 1719 views | JJJack |
Sign Ben Davies back on 17:29 - Dec 12 by airedale | I wouldn't be surprised if someone said that Rose was the best LB around the PL these days. |
Difficult to argue with that. No chance of Ben going to Chelsea- to play where? I wouldn't see him as LWB (and Alonso is playing very well in that position). I suppose as one of 3 CBs he might be useful to them but they have Zouma coming back and Ivanovic and Terry can't even get in their team at present. | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 23:14 - Dec 12 with 1704 views | TNT | Siouxsie Sioux once signed my back. | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 23:32 - Dec 12 with 1677 views | Kilkennyjack | Yes please. Ben is excellent. | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 00:06 - Dec 13 with 1621 views | TNT |
Sign Ben Davies back on 23:32 - Dec 12 by Kilkennyjack | Yes please. Ben is excellent. |
Agree. Would be a big improvement on Taylor. | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 09:14 - Dec 13 with 1422 views | deanscfc | Absolutely. Under Laudrup it was great to have a left back who could push forward and properly link with the winger. A loan would be better than nothing. Anyone know of other quality left backs about who may be available? | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 09:23 - Dec 13 with 1406 views | DafyddHuw | Why do we fixate over ex-players? | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 09:25 - Dec 13 with 1403 views | Dyfnant |
Sign Ben Davies back on 09:23 - Dec 13 by DafyddHuw | Why do we fixate over ex-players? |
Perhaps because their often better than the ones we're left with | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 09:28 - Dec 13 with 1390 views | DafyddHuw |
Sign Ben Davies back on 09:25 - Dec 13 by Dyfnant | Perhaps because their often better than the ones we're left with |
So are lots of other players. | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 09:30 - Dec 13 with 1379 views | jasper_T |
Sign Ben Davies back on 09:28 - Dec 13 by DafyddHuw | So are lots of other players. |
We've seen a lot of them, can make direct comparisons to our better footballing days, often they seem surplus to requirements at their new clubs, there's lots of reasons. | | | |
Sign Ben Davies back on 14:25 - Dec 13 with 1220 views | AussieSwan | I'd grab him for sure. Fits us to a tee. | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 14:34 - Dec 13 with 1196 views | Dewi1jack | No from me purely and simply because we need a RB to help Angel, a centre back to replace Fernandez (£6 million more than a Chico? Really?) a defensive midfielder instead of Ki and wingers that can cross while running and come back to defend. The Merrycans aren't going to "invest" (at 7% interest like Tan?) any more than they have to. I think we'd be ok with Taylor and Kingsley at LB and sort that position in the summer | |
| If you wake up breathing, thats a good start to your day and you'll make many thousands of people envious. |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 08:07 - Dec 14 with 1026 views | Devz00 | The paper talk today is that Palace want Ben Davies on loan in January. If there's anything to that then we need to make sure we are in for him too. No brainer. | |
| Genetically, paedophiles have more genes in common with crabs than they do with you and me. Now that is scientific fact. There's no real evidence for it, but it is scientific fact. |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 08:31 - Dec 14 with 991 views | waynekerr55 |
Sign Ben Davies back on 08:07 - Dec 14 by Devz00 | The paper talk today is that Palace want Ben Davies on loan in January. If there's anything to that then we need to make sure we are in for him too. No brainer. |
Meaning we'll probably miss out. Gonzo can't miss out on his dividends, can he? The massive pr*ck | |
| |
Sign Ben Davies back on 08:44 - Dec 14 with 971 views | Devz00 |
Sign Ben Davies back on 08:31 - Dec 14 by waynekerr55 | Meaning we'll probably miss out. Gonzo can't miss out on his dividends, can he? The massive pr*ck |
Yeah maybe. But the fact that he’s being linked to Palace is good for 2 reasons. Firstly, a loan is probably appealing to our owners and secondly, it suggests he’s available. We’d just have to hope he would rather come home than stay in London. Or it’s just a load of paper talk and he stays put. | |
| Genetically, paedophiles have more genes in common with crabs than they do with you and me. Now that is scientific fact. There's no real evidence for it, but it is scientific fact. |
| |
| |