| Leigh Dineen back on the Board 17:04 - Nov 21 with 24758 views | Vetchfielder |
Companies House are recording his appointment as a Director.
So, a week or so after the Trust approach the club regarding former Directors still hanging around the club (my words, not theirs) , the club go and re-appoint one of them as a Director.
It feels to me like the Yanks are taking the p*ss
I wonder if the Trust were aware of this move ? |  |
| Proud to have been one of the 231 |
| |  |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:21 - Nov 22 with 3145 views | Uxbridge |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:09 - Nov 22 by FearOfAJackPlanet |
According to that he was appointed and er...terminated, on the same day (15th Nov).
Anyone know why someone would be appointed and removed as a director on the same day? (apart from crackin' office bantz) [Post edited 22 Nov 2016 16:11]
|
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/00123414/filing-history
I think this is one of those things it really shouldn't be too difficult to think through. |  |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:22 - Nov 22 with 3133 views | headcleaner |
Didn't a Tory mp in Bristol do something similar with his property tycoon brother become a director and leave his post in the same day as it was a loophole with huge financial gains on property I believe it was. (Wish I could remember his name) it wasn't illegal but it was pretty dodgy. Not that I'm suggesting anything illegal has or is taking place at Swansea city. Personally I wouldn't want mr Dineen running my bath let alone the commercial department of a multi million pound business. Let's be honest the guys a buffoon, how many companies are falling over themselves to be involved with a premier league team I would doubt very much we've actually cold called and won over any income. |  | | |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:27 - Nov 22 with 3096 views | jacabertawe |
Further info under "Filing History" PDF |  |
| Britishness...is a political synonym for Englishness which extends English culture over the Scots, the Welsh, and the Irish. - Gwynfor Evans
|
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:35 - Nov 22 with 3039 views | NeiltheTaylor |
We've had the tragedy, now it's time for the farce. |  |
| Joe_bradshaw -I thought the cryochamber was the new name for Cardiff's stadium.
|
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:37 - Nov 22 with 3024 views | 3swan |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:35 - Nov 22 by NeiltheTaylor |
We've had the tragedy, now it's time for the farce. |
Nearly Pantomime season, we just get in early | | | |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:49 - Nov 22 with 2968 views | Rogerstone |
Companies house isn't the best at keeping accurate records. It would surprise me if they showed M Mouse as a director who is based in Florida.
I think people are reading too much into things - 5 + 5 = 1325643 |  |
| "Gylfi's on fire, your defence is terrified!" |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:53 - Nov 22 with 2938 views | Oldjack |
Appointed on
15 November 2016
Resigned on
15 November 2016
what's happening here mun ? |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 17:04 - Nov 22 with 2893 views | max936 |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 16:53 - Nov 22 by Oldjack |
Appointed on
15 November 2016
Resigned on
15 November 2016
what's happening here mun ? |
Its got to be somin snidey no doubt they're all as slippery as a bar of wet soap. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 17:35 - Nov 22 with 2802 views | WarwickHunt |
You put the fat cûnt in
You take the fat cûnt out
You do the hokey cokey
And you fûck them all about. |  | | |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 17:42 - Nov 22 with 2781 views | Gowerjack |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 22:06 - Nov 21 by Kilkennyjack |
The Trust should completely disengage.
Even look to sell all shares and bank the dosh for a rainy day. That wont be long.
This is a quite deliberate act.
Time to make a stand now. |
The shares are pretty much worthless without the voting rights. |  |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 17:51 - Nov 22 with 2749 views | Gowerjack |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 22:26 - Nov 21 by max936 |
Do they really think people are that naïve to believe in all the utter fuking bullshit they keep spouting.
I really hope the Trust are gonna come up with somin to stop these shysters totally fuking us up,  |
Too late my friend.
They Already have. | |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 18:08 - Nov 22 with 2684 views | max936 |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 17:51 - Nov 22 by Gowerjack |
Too late my friend.
They Already have. |
I reluctantly agree GJ, the Trust are in regular dialogue though "apparently"  | |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 18:12 - Nov 22 with 2669 views | Gowerjack |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 09:44 - Nov 22 by max936 |
They are saying we're in charge and there's nothing the Trust can do or say that'll change what we do, they just keep poking with that pointy stick, its clear they couldn't give a fuk about the Trust, Fans or the Team on the field they've worked it all out, they can still make enough dosh whether we go down or stay up.
In the mean time they're just saying things to appease us with no substance behind what they say.
Basically we're fuked, what could happen next year if we do own the training facility at Landore is that they'll say that they have to sell that to keep the club going, you can just see whats round the corner. |
Sell it to who ?
Who'd want to buy a PL academy?
West End? The Maltsters....
Doesnt make any sense. | |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 18:18 - Nov 22 with 2639 views | max936 |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 18:12 - Nov 22 by Gowerjack |
Sell it to who ?
Who'd want to buy a PL academy?
West End? The Maltsters....
Doesnt make any sense. |
Change it to a sports centre maybe, but yeah I see what you mean, the Council won't be able to afford it and I doubt any private sporting body could either and they can't build houses there, put that one down to me being mightily pissed off  | |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 18:24 - Nov 22 with 2603 views | Gowerjack |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 11:55 - Nov 22 by DafyddHuw |
This is the only post I've ever seen from anyone involved with the Trust actually saying that maybe some action from the ST is a possibility.
And even then it's the obliquest of references.
Can anyone from the Trust please tell me what the new/old owners have to do for the Trust to react? Or will they never react in any circumstances? |
Yep.
As I've saud before it' time to p iss or grt off the pot.
Otherwise what is the point of the Trust? | |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 18:29 - Nov 22 with 2578 views | Darran |
You sound like a f*cking woman. |  |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 19:23 - Nov 22 with 2473 views | majorraglan |
Looks like the Trust weren't aware and according to the statement published on SCFC2 he's been removed. Check it out. | | | |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 20:49 - Nov 22 with 2307 views | NOTRAC |
The only good thing about this is that it must be more embarrassing for Dineen than anyone else. | |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 23:17 - Nov 22 with 2113 views | mahoss |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 09:44 - Nov 22 by max936 |
They are saying we're in charge and there's nothing the Trust can do or say that'll change what we do, they just keep poking with that pointy stick, its clear they couldn't give a fuk about the Trust, Fans or the Team on the field they've worked it all out, they can still make enough dosh whether we go down or stay up.
In the mean time they're just saying things to appease us with no substance behind what they say.
Basically we're fuked, what could happen next year if we do own the training facility at Landore is that they'll say that they have to sell that to keep the club going, you can just see whats round the corner. |
That would never happen.
The reality is the structure of the club has totally changed to what it was 10-15 yrs ago,we are a premier league outfit with facilities to match,it,ll never go back to what it was in the Vetch days.
We want our club back,what does that actually mean ?,we,ll never be in a position to buy the club back,the Americans aren't going to just walk away after investing so much.
Surely its far more likely different owners would take over,if they decided to sell. | | | |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 23:37 - Nov 22 with 2072 views | jackonicko |
i can only presume that as we ramp up commercial operations at the club, this is the latest incarnation of Director for a Day?
Hope it makes more money for the club than Dineen ever managed. |  | | |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 00:39 - Nov 23 with 2010 views | Shonky |
 |  |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 03:26 - Nov 23 with 1965 views | Tummer_from_Texas |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 20:49 - Nov 22 by NOTRAC |
The only good thing about this is that it must be more embarrassing for Dineen than anyone else. |
No, it's probably very personally humiliating for Dineen, but it's out of his control. The people who should be most embarrassed though are Levien, Kaplan, Pearlman, and the entire Board.
I'll go ahead and say it, like everyone else: this club looks like a low-rent clown show lately. Things are obviously a little disorganised on the pitch, but it aint nothing compared to what appears to be happening behind the scenes.
These wheels falling off probably started well before the ownership change. Not to defend the Americans, because they've done more than their share of stupid things in just 5 months. [Post edited 23 Nov 2016 3:34]
|  |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 06:37 - Nov 23 with 1896 views | dobjack2 |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 23:17 - Nov 22 by mahoss |
That would never happen.
The reality is the structure of the club has totally changed to what it was 10-15 yrs ago,we are a premier league outfit with facilities to match,it,ll never go back to what it was in the Vetch days.
We want our club back,what does that actually mean ?,we,ll never be in a position to buy the club back,the Americans aren't going to just walk away after investing so much.
Surely its far more likely different owners would take over,if they decided to sell. |
I agree that we want our club back is unlikely in the short-mid term due to the amount of money that has been spent acquiring shares. Longer term will depend on the Americans exit strategy and what there is left to sell at that stage. We want the greedy b@stards who have placed us in this position out of the club is more achievable in the short term.
As for a premier league outfit - I have to disagree. We are currently playing in the premier league (unless there is a major turnaround we won't be playing in it next season) and don't look like a premier league outfit on the pitch.
The last thing we are off the pitch is premier league - a basket case, embarrassment or example of how not to run a football club would be closer to the truth. You would think that we had been studying the situations at Blackpool or Blackburn. Down to the greedy b@stards again along with the clueless tw@ts they sold to. As for the facilities - those we own are assets that can be disposed if an appropriate bid came in while any rented/lease arrangements can be terminated.
Wanting Dineen back on the board seems surreal. What did he bring to the table before the sell out? Premier league experience! what a fecking pathetic thing to say, unless it is expanded to say what they believe he has experience of that is now necessary. The PR from the majority owners is arrogant in the extreme and appears hell bent on alienating supporters. A strange strategy to say the least.
As for the Americans I agree that they aren't going to simply walk away, it's what they will do to the club before they walk away that concerns supporters.
If the result and performance against palace are not what is needed it could get nasty after the game. Not that I expect any of the greedy b@stards to be around by that time. | | | |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 07:19 - Nov 23 with 1849 views | waynekerr55 |
Admin error.
Well fúck me it's one hell of an error.
They would have had to log in, and fill all his details out on the portal.
Fûcking idiots |  |
| |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 07:34 - Nov 23 with 1830 views | 3swan |
| Leigh Dineen back on the Board on 07:19 - Nov 23 by waynekerr55 |
Admin error.
Well fúck me it's one hell of an error.
They would have had to log in, and fill all his details out on the portal.
Fûcking idiots |
The Trust announced the answer they got
"The Supporters Trust was yesterday surprised to note that, according to Companies House records, Leigh Dineen had been reappointed as a Director of the football club.
However, after discussions overnight between the Supporters Trust and the new majority owners, it was identified that the appointment was made without approval and has now been removed. It has been agreed that the issue of Leigh Dineen’s position at the club would be discussed at next month’s board meeting, which our Supporters Director will be attending."
Now is that an admin error - maybe yes as someone jumped the gun.
A total mistake - no as it seems as if there is some talk in the background | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
