| if oconnel comes who would get dropped 14:04 - Sep 1 with 2336 views | dean7321 |
it would be harsh to tanser and eastham |  |
| |  |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 14:13 - Sep 1 with 2300 views | lurker |
Could be neither. He could go 3 at the back, pushing Kennedy up the left and Raff/Rhys up the right, meaning he drops a midfielder. There is also the lone frontman option which may see Done dropped or repositioned. Loads of options.
However, if it comes down to dropping one of Tanser or Eastham, I think JOC's left footedness means it will be Tanser |  | | |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 14:16 - Sep 1 with 2287 views | dean7321 |
rhys is not a winger | |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 14:25 - Sep 1 with 2254 views | dingdangblue |
When Lancashire returns they could both find themselves out of the starting 11. We have conceded in all 6 games so far so something needed to be done - we arent going to win many games this season if we have to score 2 and 3 goals. O'Connell is class and for all Tanser's obvious potential he is still learning - the corner he gave away for Bradfords 2nd on saturday could have been put out for a throw with a bit more composure. O'Connell is a very welcome addition. |  |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 15:48 - Sep 1 with 2036 views | ChaffRAFC |
We need someone dominant in the air. As good as Tanser is, centre back isn't his natural position and we concede too many goals from set pieces so for me, Eastham and O'Connell until Lancashire is fit and then he'll have to work to dislodge one of them. |  |
| If I hadn't seen such riches, I could live with being poor |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 15:54 - Sep 1 with 2012 views | 49thseason |
I have been pleasantly surprised by Eastham, he seems to be much more comfortable with the ball at his feet than 12 months ago and his decision making has improved too. He seemed a bit of a liability last season- much better so far this. Maybe a run of games and extra responsibility has been good for him. |  | | |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 18:56 - Sep 1 with 1808 views | TalkingSutty |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 15:54 - Sep 1 by 49thseason |
I have been pleasantly surprised by Eastham, he seems to be much more comfortable with the ball at his feet than 12 months ago and his decision making has improved too. He seemed a bit of a liability last season- much better so far this. Maybe a run of games and extra responsibility has been good for him. |
Agree, he's alright Eastham. |  | | |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 18:59 - Sep 1 with 1784 views | 442Dale |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 15:48 - Sep 1 by ChaffRAFC |
We need someone dominant in the air. As good as Tanser is, centre back isn't his natural position and we concede too many goals from set pieces so for me, Eastham and O'Connell until Lancashire is fit and then he'll have to work to dislodge one of them. |
Yep. Rest Tanser, he's playing really well so a perfect time to give him a rest. He won't have expected to have featured as much as he has and it's been a great learning experience. Definitely a good option off the bench too, he'd be effective replacing Kennedy late in games because of his natural ability to carry the ball forward. |  |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:01 - Sep 1 with 1674 views | dale_spotland |
I would drop TK, think he has been quite poor so put Tanser at LB with O'Connell with Lancashire or Eastham. |  |
| Days like this one weren't supposed to happen to Rochdale. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:11 - Sep 1 with 1632 views | olympicdale |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:01 - Sep 1 by dale_spotland |
I would drop TK, think he has been quite poor so put Tanser at LB with O'Connell with Lancashire or Eastham. |
Don't agree with that, I've been impressed with TK, looks quality. |  |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:17 - Sep 1 with 1603 views | ChaffRAFC |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:01 - Sep 1 by dale_spotland |
I would drop TK, think he has been quite poor so put Tanser at LB with O'Connell with Lancashire or Eastham. |
Really?! Think quite the opposite, been very pleased with TK's start. | |
| If I hadn't seen such riches, I could live with being poor |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:20 - Sep 1 with 1585 views | olympicdale |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:17 - Sep 1 by ChaffRAFC |
Really?! Think quite the opposite, been very pleased with TK's start. |
Once he gets rid of his ridiculous bun it'll be even better,  certainly a higher standard than League 1 | |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:26 - Sep 1 with 1549 views | trueblue83 |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:01 - Sep 1 by dale_spotland |
I would drop TK, think he has been quite poor so put Tanser at LB with O'Connell with Lancashire or Eastham. |
I'd agree with this. I think Tanser has been our best defender so far. He is the only un-droppable defender at the moment for me. If we need more height in the middle, I'd pick him over TK at LB every time. Aside from his obvious defensive ability, Tanser's distribution and willingness to bring the ball out of the defence is brilliant to see. But that's not me saying TK has done anything wrong either. | |
| "You can compare us at the moment to a bit of soft porn - there is an awful lot of foreplay and not a lot going on in the box" - Sir Keith Hill |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:35 - Sep 1 with 1503 views | olympicdale |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:26 - Sep 1 by trueblue83 |
I'd agree with this. I think Tanser has been our best defender so far. He is the only un-droppable defender at the moment for me. If we need more height in the middle, I'd pick him over TK at LB every time. Aside from his obvious defensive ability, Tanser's distribution and willingness to bring the ball out of the defence is brilliant to see. But that's not me saying TK has done anything wrong either. |
Tanser has indeed been excellent, but TK's obvious experience has been vital in that area since he's come in, and the few errors Tanser has made, could be put down to lack of experience. [Post edited 1 Sep 2014 20:36]
| |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 21:23 - Sep 1 with 1428 views | Shun |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:20 - Sep 1 by olympicdale |
Once he gets rid of his ridiculous bun it'll be even better, certainly a higher standard than League 1 |
The samurai topknot is here to stay. |  | | |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 21:31 - Sep 1 with 1385 views | 442Dale |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 21:23 - Sep 1 by Shun |
The samurai topknot is here to stay. |
WiganDale said that in 1993. | |
| |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 09:18 - Sep 2 with 1217 views | irisaln |
| if oconnel comes who would get dropped on 20:01 - Sep 1 by dale_spotland |
I would drop TK, think he has been quite poor so put Tanser at LB with O'Connell with Lancashire or Eastham. |
Spot on!!!!! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
