Vote in our poll now and show the board what the fans are feeling !

There has been lots of moaning on social media, but little concentrated or unified effort to show the board at Saints that enough is enough, The Ugly Inside has created an online poll below to provide a focal point for the fans to show Ralph Krueger and Les Reed that we have had enough of watching the manager make the same mistakes and getting the same results week in week out.

THis is not a bad squad, it is just being badly managed, cange is the only way forward, vote now in the poll using the link below and share with friends and fellow Saints fans, it is time to draw a line in the sand and launch a concerted effort, rather than just doing nothing other than whinging on social media.

https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/southampton/members//polls/1976/should-a-

Photo: Action Images

SanMarco added 17:15 - Mar 5 I think the 'it is too late to sack him now' argument as articulated by, amongst others, InsideOut and Consig is, sadly, the right one. The time to sack him was after one of the two debacles (Leicester and Spuds) just before the window, or at latest, after the even bigger catastrophe vs Palace in early January. It is too late now. Just because he should never have been appointed and should have been sacked weeks ago does not make it right to do it now - however we feel about his competence. And it pays to remember that it aint just him to blame.

4

IWOZTHERE added 17:30 - Mar 5 Sheer negligence in the Summer to not strengthen our attacking. Poor error of judgement to stick with him while he took us downwards and he should have gone long ago. I don't know whether any of our senior players are authoritative enough to sort it out, but surely we'd be better off without a manager as we stand?
2

ExiledSupporter added 18:02 - Mar 5 Too late, at the moment, for analysis of how we got here, desperate action required: 1. go to Silva, offer him £1m if he keeps us up, cheap at that price given the costs of going down 2. if Silva accepts, sack MP immediately 3. no guarantees about who gets the role for next season, assuming that we stay up under Silva 4. reconsider the future of Reed and the rest the day after the season ends. 5. establish much higher standard of experience required in job description if we stay up or b) if we go down, go for a younger British manager, 6. have a new manager established one month after the end of the season and a viable plan to change our whole ethos

3

A_Saint_in_Stoke added 19:08 - Mar 5 I too respect your opinions Consigliere and understand why you feel that it is too late. At leased It will give our squad, a new lease of life. Look what the Swansea manager Carlos Carvalhal has achieved in just a few weeks! and given other teams who have been bold "A bounce factor " when changing their manager for a different face, different energy and more motivation. With the mire that HE Pellegrino has already got us in - he is not looking for a proven goalscorer NO a goalie - and you still want him to carry on as our manager ? .... The guy has not got it in him to turn it around ..... the only way is down... IF WE DO NOT CHANGE NOW although I do not wish to think about it. Pellegrino will never change - he hasn't the capacity to do that.

1

Consigliere added 20:09 - Mar 5 In favour of..................who would want to come here (who we would want to come)? Kelvin Davies has been suggested by others and personally I would be happy with Nigel Adkins who was at least passionate about the club but a world-class manager? I have my doubts.
3

A_Saint_in_Stoke added 20:54 - Mar 5 Would Nigel come to the end of June? if so then perfeck! as pa used to say.
2

janecook added 21:21 - Mar 5 could be looking forward to more games like this.
0

zonehead added 18:59 - Mar 6 Mhmm the board listened to the fans and got rid of Puel ( wrong decision) they also listened and kept VVD again wrong decision I think they know what to doing
0

Blogs 31 bloggers

Stoke City Polls