Team with BZ, LR, and AT 13:42 - Jan 20 with 2717 views | George_Milton | How do you fit Remy, Bobby and Adel in the same team? 4 4 2 with Adel out left? Cant see it being 4 3 3 Remy should play up top 4 4 2 diamond or a flat 3 in midfield? | | | | |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:49 - Jan 20 with 2692 views | Jamie | Taarabt-- Zamora-- Remy ---Park ----Mbia -----------M'Vila--------- | | | |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:52 - Jan 20 with 2682 views | wombat |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:49 - Jan 20 by Jamie | Taarabt-- Zamora-- Remy ---Park ----Mbia -----------M'Vila--------- |
Park ? | |
| |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:53 - Jan 20 with 2675 views | RANGERS4EVER | ---Mbia----M'Vila----Faurlin--- ------------Taarabt-------------- -------Zamora-----Remy-------- | |
| |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:55 - Jan 20 with 2669 views | BAWHoops | We won't see that team. It will be SWP.....Mvilla.....Mbia......Mackie ................Taarabt............... .................Remy................ BZ will be a sub and we will play on the counter | |
| http://blogandwhitehoops.wordpress.com/ |
| |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:57 - Jan 20 with 2666 views | ElHoop | Difficult with our back four as it is now. The only way I can see it working is with a back 5, full backs pushing forward more and getting more ball in from the wings, and somebody more mobile in central midfield. Cesar Onouha Nelsen Mbia Hill Fabio Mackie/SWP Livermore Taarabt Remy Zamora But that's asking a lot of Taarabt when the lineup is not obviously defensive. Would he get back enough to protect Fabio when Fabio goes forward? | | | |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:58 - Jan 20 with 2662 views | HollowayRanger | -----------BZ----LR---------- ------<<<<<AT>>>>>>------ ------SB---M.VILA--AF------ FDS------CH------RN-----NO ---------------JC--------------- TRY this first then options of granero park hoilett derry swp mackie DJ(KEEP) one of which would need to play when nelsen leaves end of febuary? | |
| |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 14:12 - Jan 20 with 2641 views | Jamie |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:52 - Jan 20 by wombat | Park ? |
Unfortunately, HR seems to like him. AF is well out of favour, SD can't play every game and Granero hotter & colder than Katy Perry. | | | |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 15:03 - Jan 20 with 2585 views | WatfordR | We need the ability to score goals. That is going to be the key to our survival. Limiting our ambition to scoring one goal a game won't be good enough. So I think that our formation must include two strikers up front. Whether we play two pacy strikers or a big man with Remy will then determine what formation we have in midfield. I cant believe Cisse has been allowed to go without at least one more striker coming in, I'd be inclined to look for a Danny Graham type to add to BZ and LR with Mackie as back up for LR. I think our biggest problem then is actually getting the central midfield personnel right. If you put AT in behind the front two, then I think its got to be three mobile, athletic mainly defensive midfielders behind him, and I'd choose Mbia - MVila (hopefully) - Diakite. When Nelsen goes,I'd move Onuoha into CD alongside Hill, with Fabio at LB and a new RB. I think we could do with another CB too, but it doesn't need to be any more than cover. Assuming SWP and Park stay, I think our 25 will look like this: GK - Cesar, Green, Murphy RB - (New), Young LB - Fabio, Traore CB - Hill, Onuoha, Ferdinand, (New) RCM - Mbia, Granero, Park LCM - Diakite, Faurlin CM - MVila, Derry ACM - Taarabt, Hoilett, SWP Str - (New), Zamora, Remy, Mackie | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 15:53 - Jan 21 with 2493 views | pomanjou |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 15:03 - Jan 20 by WatfordR | We need the ability to score goals. That is going to be the key to our survival. Limiting our ambition to scoring one goal a game won't be good enough. So I think that our formation must include two strikers up front. Whether we play two pacy strikers or a big man with Remy will then determine what formation we have in midfield. I cant believe Cisse has been allowed to go without at least one more striker coming in, I'd be inclined to look for a Danny Graham type to add to BZ and LR with Mackie as back up for LR. I think our biggest problem then is actually getting the central midfield personnel right. If you put AT in behind the front two, then I think its got to be three mobile, athletic mainly defensive midfielders behind him, and I'd choose Mbia - MVila (hopefully) - Diakite. When Nelsen goes,I'd move Onuoha into CD alongside Hill, with Fabio at LB and a new RB. I think we could do with another CB too, but it doesn't need to be any more than cover. Assuming SWP and Park stay, I think our 25 will look like this: GK - Cesar, Green, Murphy RB - (New), Young LB - Fabio, Traore CB - Hill, Onuoha, Ferdinand, (New) RCM - Mbia, Granero, Park LCM - Diakite, Faurlin CM - MVila, Derry ACM - Taarabt, Hoilett, SWP Str - (New), Zamora, Remy, Mackie |
We should not get too excited about Zamora being available again. He was playing crap when he was 'fit' and stated he was no longer interested in football despite it pays him in a week more than many earn in a year. | |
| |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 16:05 - Jan 21 with 2465 views | stevec | First and foremost, keep that defence shored up and Taraabt should be playing up front. Remy and Hoilett (SWP) making runs from either side. Assuming Nelsen leaves shortly; Cesar Onouha, Ferdinand, Hill, Fabio Remy, Mbia, Derry, Park, Hoilett (or SWP) Taraabt | | | |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 16:18 - Jan 21 with 2442 views | THEBUSH | With the players we have at the moment and when fit, don't look good, does it !! Cesar Onu, Nel, Hill, Fab, Derry, Mbia, Mac, Adel, BZ, Remy | | | |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 17:28 - Jan 21 with 2412 views | simmo |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 13:53 - Jan 20 by RANGERS4EVER | ---Mbia----M'Vila----Faurlin--- ------------Taarabt-------------- -------Zamora-----Remy-------- |
See that to me looks great, but it means we need to get the full backs really pushed on, it seems silly to waste 2 strikers that are so good in the air by not having wingers so will need real attacking FBs to put crosses in. I personally dont think we will play them both together especially against the 'big teams' because our game is deep lying with quick counter attacks although that could work with BZ as the target man to hold it up waiting for Remy etc. Then though we lose the defensive work of Mackie and SWP that makes that style so hard to break down. Who would be a manger eh? | |
| ask Beavis I get nothing Butthead |
| |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 17:36 - Jan 21 with 2396 views | bob566 |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 15:53 - Jan 21 by pomanjou | We should not get too excited about Zamora being available again. He was playing crap when he was 'fit' and stated he was no longer interested in football despite it pays him in a week more than many earn in a year. |
pom we all get down in our jobs now and again. Maybe even footballers too. Hopefully he'll be hungry after his injury. | | | |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 17:58 - Jan 21 with 2364 views | Charlie1 |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 17:36 - Jan 21 by bob566 | pom we all get down in our jobs now and again. Maybe even footballers too. Hopefully he'll be hungry after his injury. |
and not eat on his own He was doing ok at the start of the season! I'm not sure what people expect of BZ. He's been played up front at times on his own so it's not about doing a Mackie! | |
| |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 19:23 - Jan 21 with 2324 views | jamois | I'm quite excited about the return of BZ. I think HR will get the best out of him. A front three of him with Adel and Remy either side is what I think HR has in mind. | |
| |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 21:01 - Jan 21 with 2283 views | TW_R |
Team with BZ, LR, and AT on 15:53 - Jan 21 by pomanjou | We should not get too excited about Zamora being available again. He was playing crap when he was 'fit' and stated he was no longer interested in football despite it pays him in a week more than many earn in a year. |
Yeah - 4 goals in 11 games. Bloody useless eh! Considering he was obviously playing while carrying an injury. I don't think he ever said he was no longer interested in football. I think he actually said he didn't watch football. | | | |
| |