| Starmer under investigation 13:52 - May 6 with 10484 views | KeithHaynes |
For doing a Boris !
Brilliant 😂 |  |
| |  |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:08 - May 6 with 2818 views | raynor94 |
You can't make it up, 30 people drinking and eating curry, sounds like a Boris party to me |  |
| |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:12 - May 6 with 2810 views | Lorax |
Some people claimed there was no wrongdoing yet now there is a proper investigation after "new evidence" came in.
Somebody even justified it by saying they get 100 plus curries delivered to work, Jim was it?
If Starmer and co broke the rules then they should be fined and if Starmer has the morals and ethics he applied to Bojo, if he gets fined then he should resign.
My money is on him being just as slimy as Bojo! |  | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:17 - May 6 with 2805 views | Whiterockin |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:12 - May 6 by Lorax |
Some people claimed there was no wrongdoing yet now there is a proper investigation after "new evidence" came in.
Somebody even justified it by saying they get 100 plus curries delivered to work, Jim was it?
If Starmer and co broke the rules then they should be fined and if Starmer has the morals and ethics he applied to Bojo, if he gets fined then he should resign.
My money is on him being just as slimy as Bojo! |
As I have said frequently on here all politicians are liars. Just accept it and you won't be disappointed. More to the point, strange how this has come out after the local election votes are in. |  | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:19 - May 6 with 2800 views | Lorax |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:17 - May 6 by Whiterockin |
As I have said frequently on here all politicians are liars. Just accept it and you won't be disappointed. More to the point, strange how this has come out after the local election votes are in. |
There is a group of us on here who don't seem to have any party loyaltiy and constantly deride the grasping, greedy, lying politicians on all sides.
Maybe we should start our own party? | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:20 - May 6 with 2789 views | Whiterockin |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:19 - May 6 by Lorax |
There is a group of us on here who don't seem to have any party loyaltiy and constantly deride the grasping, greedy, lying politicians on all sides.
Maybe we should start our own party? |
But then we would have to lie and be corrupt.  | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:24 - May 6 with 2730 views | Kilkennyjack |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:12 - May 6 by Lorax |
Some people claimed there was no wrongdoing yet now there is a proper investigation after "new evidence" came in.
Somebody even justified it by saying they get 100 plus curries delivered to work, Jim was it?
If Starmer and co broke the rules then they should be fined and if Starmer has the morals and ethics he applied to Bojo, if he gets fined then he should resign.
My money is on him being just as slimy as Bojo! |
If guilty yes Starmer should resign, straight after that Johnson resigns. |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:34 - May 6 with 2765 views | Lorax |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:20 - May 6 by Whiterockin |
But then we would have to lie and be corrupt. |
We could break the mould and be the honest, upstanding party!
Kilkenny, Starmer could try being the man he portrays himself to be. Saying Bojo should resign but then clinging to his own position (if he turns out to be guilty) would make him every bit as bad as Bojo.
I'm watching the news and they found Starmer entering the train station in Carlisle (after he'd left Durham) and tried asking him if he'd heard from the police. he didn't acknowledge the question, didn't even look at the reporter, he just ignored it all.
Don't know about anyone else but that isnt a good look. Seems to me he was running away from it. They are probably trying to come up with some waffle to try and excuse it if they are fined! I expect Starmer to stand up in Parliament when next they meet and say...it's time we all moved on now  | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:38 - May 6 with 2754 views | 1983 |
Sir Starmer KCB QC a man of the people !
They are all slime |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Starmer under investigation on 14:40 - May 6 with 2747 views | Whiterockin |
BBC reporting now.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-61352174
"The force initially concluded that no offence had occurred on 30 April last year, but said it had since received "significant new information".
It added that it had delayed announcing the investigation until after Thursday's local elections."
Why wait until after the local elections????? | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:44 - May 6 with 2737 views | GixerJack |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:19 - May 6 by Lorax |
There is a group of us on here who don't seem to have any party loyaltiy and constantly deride the grasping, greedy, lying politicians on all sides.
Maybe we should start our own party? |
Don’t forget to invite Piroe!!! |  | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 14:53 - May 6 with 2724 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
Not sure why you need 30 people in a room for a political meeting, even Parliament went largely remote? |  |
| |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:05 - May 6 with 2658 views | pikeypaul |
Starmer the hypocrite travelled a couple hundreds of miles to be at his piss up.
Also it was on the Durham Labour Party Facebook page the day before inviting people to bring a bottle to the party, this is the new evidence .
Hypocrites, and if they have any honour the same people who called for BOJO to resign should do the same for Starmer the hypocritical liar.But of course they won’t and that tells us all what we need to know about the types they are. [Post edited 6 May 2022 16:10]
|  |
| |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:22 - May 6 with 2648 views | Lorax |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:05 - May 6 by pikeypaul |
Starmer the hypocrite travelled a couple hundreds of miles to be at his piss up.
Also it was on the Durham Labour Party Facebook page the day before inviting people to bring a bottle to the party, this is the new evidence .
Hypocrites, and if they have any honour the same people who called for BOJO to resign should do the same for Starmer the hypocritical liar.But of course they won’t and that tells us all what we need to know about the types they are. [Post edited 6 May 2022 16:10]
|
So there we have it, in a righteous world both Labour and Tories should be looking for a new leader but it is not a righteous world, nowhere near.
At the next election the choice will again be between the devil and the deep blue sea. A lying, deceitful Bojo or a lying, hypocritical Starmer. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:24 - May 6 with 2647 views | Sirjohnalot |
If he’s receives a FPN then he needs to fight it or accept and resign. Question is then, what do Johnson and Sunak do ? |  | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:36 - May 6 with 2632 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:24 - May 6 by Sirjohnalot |
If he’s receives a FPN then he needs to fight it or accept and resign. Question is then, what do Johnson and Sunak do ? |
.....or he'll give us a load of platitudes | |
| |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:42 - May 6 with 2625 views | Whiterockin |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:24 - May 6 by Sirjohnalot |
If he’s receives a FPN then he needs to fight it or accept and resign. Question is then, what do Johnson and Sunak do ? |
Nobody's going to resign John politics is a dirty game, it's just 15 all at the moment. It's wrong this was publicly held back though, that needs looking into. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:51 - May 6 with 2612 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:42 - May 6 by Whiterockin |
Nobody's going to resign John politics is a dirty game, it's just 15 all at the moment. It's wrong this was publicly held back though, that needs looking into. |
From what I know of KS from private practice. He would do the decent thing.
If however, he and his team were working late and they ordered food with a beer or two, that would, not fall foul of the law at the time. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:51 - May 6 with 2612 views | majorraglan |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:24 - May 6 by Sirjohnalot |
If he’s receives a FPN then he needs to fight it or accept and resign. Question is then, what do Johnson and Sunak do ? |
I agree with you, from what I can see it’s a one off as opposed to the Boris catalogue of parties, but the law is the law. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:52 - May 6 with 2610 views | Whiterockin |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:51 - May 6 by Sirjohnalot |
From what I know of KS from private practice. He would do the decent thing.
If however, he and his team were working late and they ordered food with a beer or two, that would, not fall foul of the law at the time. |
What about the bring a bottle on the Facebook page. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:05 - May 6 with 2589 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Starmer under investigation on 16:52 - May 6 by Whiterockin |
What about the bring a bottle on the Facebook page. |
I’ve not heard about that. There’s clearly a difference between a group of co workers, working late, ordering a take away and some beer and having leaving do’s.
I’d be astonished if KS has broken the rules. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:14 - May 6 with 2569 views | raynor94 |
I'm just amazed at this drinking alcohol whilst in work | |
| |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:27 - May 6 with 2532 views | Flynnidine_Zidownes |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:14 - May 6 by raynor94 |
I'm just amazed at this drinking alcohol whilst in work |
This. Absolutely this. If our elected officials and their staff can’t go a full day without alcohol or nipping off to the toilets to shove a load of Charlie up their schnozz then there’s a serious problem. These people are making decisions that affect the lives of millions. The least we can expect is that they’re sober while they’re doing it. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:50 - May 6 with 2515 views | Sirjohnalot |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:14 - May 6 by raynor94 |
I'm just amazed at this drinking alcohol whilst in work |
Don’t disagree but from what I can see.
This took place on 30 April last year.
At the time the covid rules were different to the breaches involving Johnson. His was a pre arranged party, this appears to be a meal, during campaigning where restaurants were shut. It’s likely that the police will say it was reasonable for work.
Johnson is likely to be fined for Christmas parties, leaving dos etc. if (as the S*n) suggests it was a pre arranged Social, that would be illegal. KS says that wasn’t the case.
Starmer has said that as they were campaigning, there was no where else to get food. Under the regs at the time, if they were working, this was perfectly legal.
It has to be proven so that the court is ‘sure’ the gatherings were not ‘reasonably necessary‘ for work. Unless something emerges of which I have not heard about. I can’t see how this can be shown.
Not that it matters but I didn’t vote labour yesterday, I’m just commenting on what the law was at the time.
If Starmer had done the same as Johnson I’d be equally as critical of him. There’s plenty of idiots in Labour too. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:57 - May 6 with 2498 views | Whiterockin |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:50 - May 6 by Sirjohnalot |
Don’t disagree but from what I can see.
This took place on 30 April last year.
At the time the covid rules were different to the breaches involving Johnson. His was a pre arranged party, this appears to be a meal, during campaigning where restaurants were shut. It’s likely that the police will say it was reasonable for work.
Johnson is likely to be fined for Christmas parties, leaving dos etc. if (as the S*n) suggests it was a pre arranged Social, that would be illegal. KS says that wasn’t the case.
Starmer has said that as they were campaigning, there was no where else to get food. Under the regs at the time, if they were working, this was perfectly legal.
It has to be proven so that the court is ‘sure’ the gatherings were not ‘reasonably necessary‘ for work. Unless something emerges of which I have not heard about. I can’t see how this can be shown.
Not that it matters but I didn’t vote labour yesterday, I’m just commenting on what the law was at the time.
If Starmer had done the same as Johnson I’d be equally as critical of him. There’s plenty of idiots in Labour too. |
Johnson was in his home Starmer was hundreds of miles away from his. Who really cares anyway they are both out of order and people are just trying to defend the leader of the party they support, when what they have done is inexcusable. | | | |
| Starmer under investigation on 18:02 - May 6 with 2836 views | Flynnidine_Zidownes |
| Starmer under investigation on 17:50 - May 6 by Sirjohnalot |
Don’t disagree but from what I can see.
This took place on 30 April last year.
At the time the covid rules were different to the breaches involving Johnson. His was a pre arranged party, this appears to be a meal, during campaigning where restaurants were shut. It’s likely that the police will say it was reasonable for work.
Johnson is likely to be fined for Christmas parties, leaving dos etc. if (as the S*n) suggests it was a pre arranged Social, that would be illegal. KS says that wasn’t the case.
Starmer has said that as they were campaigning, there was no where else to get food. Under the regs at the time, if they were working, this was perfectly legal.
It has to be proven so that the court is ‘sure’ the gatherings were not ‘reasonably necessary‘ for work. Unless something emerges of which I have not heard about. I can’t see how this can be shown.
Not that it matters but I didn’t vote labour yesterday, I’m just commenting on what the law was at the time.
If Starmer had done the same as Johnson I’d be equally as critical of him. There’s plenty of idiots in Labour too. |
I think the food thing is completely acceptable. But if it’s true that they were all told to “bring a bottle” then that puts a different spin on things. Also there’s probably no need to eat and drink together communally if they’ve all got their own hotel rooms. Just goes to show how ridiculous the rules were really. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
