By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Don't try and put words in my mouth or attempt character assassination as it won't work on me.
Try it for yourself. Next time there's a riot or a big protest, walk around the area with a baseball bat and say you are there to protect a strangers property.
Next time you see a punch up in the East stand, go over and try and sort it out yourself. I'm sure the CCTV cameras will determine that you are the good guy
What else could you possibly mean by him doing his time? Surely you are implying that he should now be allowed to go around attacking children? If not then please explain.
We are talking about America, not Swansea it’s perfectly normal and legal to be openly carrying a fire arm.
What does a punch up in the Liberty got to do with anything? This wasn’t a punch up.
It was a boy attacked for putting out a fire.
You have to be trolling.
Swansea Independent Poster of the Year 2021 and 2022.
Kyle Rittenhouse on 13:22 - Nov 25 by Dr_Parnassus
What else could you possibly mean by him doing his time? Surely you are implying that he should now be allowed to go around attacking children? If not then please explain.
We are talking about America, not Swansea it’s perfectly normal and legal to be openly carrying a fire arm.
What does a punch up in the Liberty got to do with anything? This wasn’t a punch up.
It was a boy attacked for putting out a fire.
You have to be trolling.
He did 10 years for his offence and was released, what else can it mean? I don't know what you are getting at. You are stating that it's ok for him to be killed because of his past crimes, but that's not what the law said.
I know it's America, and it's a basket case of a society, but he wasn't there to put out fires armed with an assault rifle
He did 10 years for his offence and was released, what else can it mean? I don't know what you are getting at. You are stating that it's ok for him to be killed because of his past crimes, but that's not what the law said.
I know it's America, and it's a basket case of a society, but he wasn't there to put out fires armed with an assault rifle
Where did I say it was ok for him to be killed for his past crimes?
We are saying this child rapist was killed because he attacked another child threatening to kill him and cut out his heart while going to grab his firearm after a long chase.
What has him serving a 10 year sentence previously got to do with anything? Apart from affirming the danger he was faced if he succeeded in taking his gun from him.
What do you mean he wasn’t there to put out fires armed with a rifle? Then why was he putting out fires? The rioters were armed with assault rifles too, it would be ludicrous to enter that environment to put out their fires without being armed.
You are not familiar with the case at all, don’t even know basic details and covering up your lack of knowledge by digging your heels in.
Swansea Independent Poster of the Year 2021 and 2022.
Kyle Rittenhouse on 13:54 - Nov 25 by Dr_Parnassus
Where did I say it was ok for him to be killed for his past crimes?
We are saying this child rapist was killed because he attacked another child threatening to kill him and cut out his heart while going to grab his firearm after a long chase.
What has him serving a 10 year sentence previously got to do with anything? Apart from affirming the danger he was faced if he succeeded in taking his gun from him.
What do you mean he wasn’t there to put out fires armed with a rifle? Then why was he putting out fires? The rioters were armed with assault rifles too, it would be ludicrous to enter that environment to put out their fires without being armed.
You are not familiar with the case at all, don’t even know basic details and covering up your lack of knowledge by digging your heels in.
I haven't read anything about him putting out fires. You simply don't arrive at a riot with an armed weapon.
Rittenhouse wouldn't have know about any previous convictions
I haven't read anything about him putting out fires. You simply don't arrive at a riot with an armed weapon.
Rittenhouse wouldn't have know about any previous convictions
Yep, you do if you value self defence.
He doesn’t have to know about previous convictions. All he knew is someone was threatening to kill him and trying to take his weapon.
Happy reading…
She said Rosenbaum was angry at Rittenhouse and other armed men who were trying to put the fire out with fire extinguishers. “Rosenbaum was arguing. He said, ‘Why did you do that?'” she said. She said the people associated with BLM or Antifa “started throwing stuff at us. Bricks, metal.” They were using hammers to get chunks of the curbs to throw, she said (we observed chipped away curbs in Kenosha).
[Post edited 25 Nov 2021 14:10]
Swansea Independent Poster of the Year 2021 and 2022.
Kyle Rittenhouse on 14:03 - Nov 25 by Dr_Parnassus
Yep, you do if you value self defence.
He doesn’t have to know about previous convictions. All he knew is someone was threatening to kill him and trying to take his weapon.
Happy reading…
She said Rosenbaum was angry at Rittenhouse and other armed men who were trying to put the fire out with fire extinguishers. “Rosenbaum was arguing. He said, ‘Why did you do that?'” she said. She said the people associated with BLM or Antifa “started throwing stuff at us. Bricks, metal.” They were using hammers to get chunks of the curbs to throw, she said (we observed chipped away curbs in Kenosha).
[Post edited 25 Nov 2021 14:10]
He didn't go there to put out fires. Many pictures show him patrolling the streets with a weapon. He put himself in that position, therefore , in my view it wasn't self defence. The Jury doesn't agree, but as you said, it's America not the UK
He didn't go there to put out fires. Many pictures show him patrolling the streets with a weapon. He put himself in that position, therefore , in my view it wasn't self defence. The Jury doesn't agree, but as you said, it's America not the UK
He did go there to put out fires, that is exactly why he was there. He was protecting damage to a car lot by doing that, that was their aim.
If you think he was there for aggressive reasons then point out a single time he was the aggressor.
You can’t. Because he wasn’t.
Self defence.
Swansea Independent Poster of the Year 2021 and 2022.
He didn't go there to put out fires. Many pictures show him patrolling the streets with a weapon. He put himself in that position, therefore , in my view it wasn't self defence. The Jury doesn't agree, but as you said, it's America not the UK
He was incredibly foolish to go there in the first place. He said recently that with hindsight he shouldn’t have gone. But that doesn’t void your right to self defence.
He was incredibly foolish to go there in the first place. He said recently that with hindsight he shouldn’t have gone. But that doesn’t void your right to self defence.
Depends which view you are coming from.
I’m sure he regrets going because of what happened to him.
But the other like minded people who stopped fires from spreading that didn’t get attacked I’m sure were glad they went and helped and don’t feel they were anything like foolish, and am sure the residents and owners of businesses they stopped being burned down by dousing those flames are incredibly thankful.
But yes, he was absolutely right to defend himself.
Swansea Independent Poster of the Year 2021 and 2022.
Need the media and certain famous faces to now admit they were wrong and issue an apology not only to Kyle himself but for the anger they intentionally stirred up for a year, and continue to stir up of course.
It’s amazing how many people buy into their rubbish. Part of me thinks it’s pro-active and willing blindness though.
It plays into their narrative so they are happy to accept what they are told even though they know it’s complete rubbish.
Swansea Independent Poster of the Year 2021 and 2022.