| Hammers in for Hogan 11:55 - Jan 1 with 121454 views | hitman |
Just reading West Ham are about to put in a 10 million
Bid for Scott hogan due to a medical
With Dale getting 20%
Interesting reading |  | | |  |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 18:10 - Jan 11 with 8242 views | bocadave |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 13:59 - Jan 11 by dingdangblue |
The criteria was £100k or more.............not a bag of footballs and a set of cones! |
Did you forget young Mr ronan. |  | | |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 18:21 - Jan 11 with 8166 views | dingdangblue |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 18:10 - Jan 11 by bocadave |
Did you forget young Mr ronan. |
No, just left him out as he never got the chance to be coached by Hilly. Yes we've benefitted from his sale and may do even further but Hilly didn't have much to do with his development. [Post edited 11 Jan 2017 18:22]
|  |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 19:49 - Jan 11 with 7872 views | 442Dale |
So if it's that version, it could be 25% of about £8m (once the original fee is taken off, could be a bit more), then 25% of further add-ons. So if they get, say, £100,000 for him playing 10 games, we get 25k and all the other bits included. |  |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 19:55 - Jan 11 with 7808 views | boromat |
To be fair it actually sounds much more believable. But we'll see. No matter what the details if it goes through it'll be great for the club. | |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 20:09 - Jan 11 with 7719 views | SuddenLad |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 19:49 - Jan 11 by 442Dale |
So if it's that version, it could be 25% of about £8m (once the original fee is taken off, could be a bit more), then 25% of further add-ons. So if they get, say, £100,000 for him playing 10 games, we get 25k and all the other bits included. |
More or less I'd say it's.........
25% of £8.25 million to start with (taking into account the initial Brentford fee for Hogan) and then a further 25% of any subsequent increments as they are reached by whatever criteria is set, to a maximum of another £6 million (therefore another £1.5 million in our coffers.).
Dale would receive £2.05 million initially followed ( possibly by a further £1.5 million) = possible total of £3.55 million. 😲 |  |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 20:29 - Jan 11 with 7638 views | DevonDale |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 20:09 - Jan 11 by SuddenLad |
More or less I'd say it's.........
25% of £8.25 million to start with (taking into account the initial Brentford fee for Hogan) and then a further 25% of any subsequent increments as they are reached by whatever criteria is set, to a maximum of another £6 million (therefore another £1.5 million in our coffers.).
Dale would receive £2.05 million initially followed ( possibly by a further £1.5 million) = possible total of £3.55 million. 😲 |
Although the 30% that is also banded around in some quarters would be even nicer!!! | | | |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 21:44 - Jan 11 with 7398 views | rochdaleriddler |
Was hoping he'd move elsewhere, can't stand West Ham, they ripped us off with byeater deal |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:00 - Jan 11 with 7323 views | nordenblue |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 21:44 - Jan 11 by rochdaleriddler |
Was hoping he'd move elsewhere, can't stand West Ham, they ripped us off with byeater deal |
Whys that then? | | | |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:05 - Jan 11 with 7287 views | TVOS1907 |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 21:44 - Jan 11 by rochdaleriddler |
Was hoping he'd move elsewhere, can't stand West Ham, they ripped us off with byeater deal |
Byeater should really play for Wigan. |  |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:06 - Jan 11 with 7291 views | SuddenLad |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 21:44 - Jan 11 by rochdaleriddler |
Was hoping he'd move elsewhere, can't stand West Ham, they ripped us off with byeater deal |
No they didn't. Much of the Bywayer deal and 'add-ons' criteria never came to fruition. | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:29 - Jan 11 with 7167 views | nordenblue |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:06 - Jan 11 by SuddenLad |
No they didn't. Much of the Bywayer deal and 'add-ons' criteria never came to fruition. |
Did he only play the 1 game for us or something silly?Not bad money really.... | | | |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:31 - Jan 11 with 7154 views | TVOS1907 |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:29 - Jan 11 by nordenblue |
Did he only play the 1 game for us or something silly?Not bad money really.... |
Aye and conceded six goals in the process! | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:42 - Jan 11 with 7112 views | dingdangblue |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 21:44 - Jan 11 by rochdaleriddler |
Was hoping he'd move elsewhere, can't stand West Ham, they ripped us off with byeater deal |
Any money we got for Byeater was a bonus - other than him being 6ft 2 he was bang average. [Post edited 11 Jan 2017 23:39]
| |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:45 - Jan 11 with 7098 views | nordenblue |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:31 - Jan 11 by TVOS1907 |
Aye and conceded six goals in the process! |
Whilst standing for 90mins in a hurricane...... | | | |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:48 - Jan 11 with 7083 views | 442Dale |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:42 - Jan 11 by dingdangblue |
Any money we got for Byeater was a bonus - other than him being 6ft 2 he was bang average. [Post edited 11 Jan 2017 23:39]
|
Totally agree. He wasn't even that good for the reserves. | |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:56 - Jan 11 with 7042 views | TVOS1907 |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:48 - Jan 11 by 442Dale |
Totally agree. He wasn't even that good for the reserves. |
Or at half-time penalty shoot-outs. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 23:11 - Jan 11 with 6990 views | dingdangblue |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:56 - Jan 11 by TVOS1907 |
Or at half-time penalty shoot-outs. |
Or to drive the coach. | |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 23:29 - Jan 11 with 6937 views | 442Dale |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:45 - Jan 11 by nordenblue |
Whilst standing for 90mins in a hurricane...... |
It was a different Carlisle Autowindscreens game. One of the worst performances I've seen from any Dale side ever. | |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 07:59 - Jan 12 with 6666 views | nordenblue |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 23:29 - Jan 11 by 442Dale |
It was a different Carlisle Autowindscreens game. One of the worst performances I've seen from any Dale side ever. |
Tbf I've blocked that entire match out due to the trauma suffered.....I only remember Andy Thakeray for obvious reasons. | | | |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 11:32 - Jan 12 with 6299 views | electricblue |
According to the sports media in reporting on the Hogan transfer...
West Ham are close to landing Brentford striker Scott Hogan in a £15m deal.
The two parties have been arguing over addons rather than an upfront payment of £9m with old club Rochdale due to land 25% of that fee..... |  |
| My all time favourite Dale player Mr Lyndon Symmonds |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 12:17 - Jan 12 with 6152 views | dingdangblue |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 11:32 - Jan 12 by electricblue |
According to the sports media in reporting on the Hogan transfer...
West Ham are close to landing Brentford striker Scott Hogan in a £15m deal.
The two parties have been arguing over addons rather than an upfront payment of £9m with old club Rochdale due to land 25% of that fee..... |
We should also get 25% of add ons when they materialise too. | |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 19:19 - Jan 12 with 5730 views | BigKindo |
West Ham are close to wrapping up the transfer of Brentford striker Scott Hogan in a deal worth £15m, having had three earlier bids for the 24-year-old rejected. (Sun)
From the Sun/BBC Football Gossip page today. |  | | |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 20:21 - Jan 12 with 5536 views | rochdaleriddler |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 22:06 - Jan 11 by SuddenLad |
No they didn't. Much of the Bywayer deal and 'add-ons' criteria never came to fruition. |
Ah so they didn't drop him just to avoid a payment due, then said they couldn't afford to pay the rest of the deal, as they had been relegated | |
| |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 20:59 - Jan 12 with 5403 views | SuddenLad |
| Hammers in for Hogan on 20:21 - Jan 12 by rochdaleriddler |
Ah so they didn't drop him just to avoid a payment due, then said they couldn't afford to pay the rest of the deal, as they had been relegated |
He went on loan to Derby after some poor performances and a slating in the press/media. He never made an England appearance, which was another clause whereby 'add-ons' were due. [Post edited 12 Jan 2017 21:06]
| |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
