 | Forum
Reply | Trump assassination attempt again
at 11:40 17 Sep 2024
True Rich.
You'd think that the office of President was too important, too prestigious, too critical for a chancer like Trump to ever get close, That one would have to be a particular class of upstanding to deserve it. However, when you look closer there's a fair selection of nausea-inducing rogues who have been there - Wilson, Jackson, Arthur etc.. Though at least back then the US was not a superpower let alone the foremost superpower - which makes the prospect of Dump all the more worrying (especially since he clearly was not subject to being shaped into a more moderate statesman by the office the first time around, as many had hoped he might be...)
Then again, those who say he would never work here - and we ended up with that mendacious, bumbling, insubstantial haystack Johnson. Not quite the same but certainly molded from the same heap of stinking sht... [Post edited 17 Sep 11:44]
|
| Forum
Reply | Trump assassination attempt again
at 15:05 16 Sep 2024
I don't watch CNN.
There is plenty of proof for the likelihood or even certainty of most of the above in statements he has made himself, his actual deeds between 2016-2020 and the Project 2025 document.
I mean, ffs like... |
| Forum
Reply | Trump assassination attempt again
at 12:55 16 Sep 2024
Ooh, I'll have a go
1) Will dismantle the neutral civil service and replace with a politicised one formed from his cronies
2) Will see to it that any route towards universal healthcare will be closed for good
3) Will reward billionaires like himself with further tax cuts
Bonus 4) Will capitulate to Putin undermining allies of the US but also devaluing the US itself in regards of its own national security and perceived strength
Not to mention what his (as yet unstated plans) are for electoral reform (talk of never having to vote again ?), the advancement of populism, introducing further tariffs for the purpose of his obsession with protectionism thereby stoking further inflation, stuffing SCoTUS with even more conservative justices sympathetic to his aims and agenda (in turn weakening constitutional checks and balances even further), ..
I mean really ? No negatives ? Really ?? [Post edited 16 Sep 12:57]
|
| Forum
Reply | Labour voters
at 09:42 9 Sep 2024
" window of opportunity for blaming the Tories slammed shut"
No it didn't. That window is still very much wide open and blowing about in the gale with papers swirling all over the place... |
| Forum
Reply | David Conn: There is more to lament about fallen Swansea than relegation
at 13:47 16 May 2018
Not at all amigo. I'm not clapping and I'm certainly not happy. I'm not an active participant of the ST either but I do recognise that quaint old concept of apportioning the blame correctly and venting my anger in the necessary direction.
So to repeat
- what else could the Trust have done ? (once they no longer held a majority - thanks to the roofer, the shyster and vending machine salesman et al pulling the rug from under them)
- what legal action can be taken ? (there was nothing limiting the shareholders from dumping other than the usual fiduciary duties to the club and the shareholders - good f'ing luck arguing those were breached down at the ChD)
Point is - what good are you actually doing ball-acheing about it on here ?? [Post edited 16 May 2018 13:48]
|
| Forum
Reply | David Conn: There is more to lament about fallen Swansea than relegation
at 12:53 16 May 2018
Would dearly love to know what all the whingers on here
a - think the Trust could have done more ?
b - what recourse to legal action there is ?
Seeing as Cocknose and his pals (including the shyster hotelier) sold to a consortium that then had a majority share...
You lot do my head in...  [Post edited 16 May 2018 12:54]
|
| Forum
Reply | British fight back?
at 07:48 21 Jun 2017
Yeah, really plausible. The fact that he was shouting "I want to kill all Muslims" and then contemptuously waving from the back of the police van really lends powerful credence to your theory.
Moron ! |
| Forum
Reply | The OFFICIAL Bob Bradley must go now thread *Sticky*
at 17:36 3 Dec 2016
I'm on a train back to Liverpool St packed with Spuds fans and, make absolutely no f'ing mistake, we are a total laughing stock. When an Australian says 'Eyy Mayr thii gaain deen' it says it all.
The clueless slaphead Septic has to go. Sooner better... |
| Forum
Reply | The London Fans Forum
at 13:46 5 Nov 2014
Why not just challenge each other to a 10 lap skate race around the rink ? 
Winner gets the next round in [Post edited 5 Nov 2014 13:46]
|
| Forum
Reply | An Important Question about Treasury Shares and Authorized but not Issued Shares
at 13:38 5 Nov 2014
Answers
1) The club does not have "authorised but unissued" shares
2) There are no "Treasury shares"
This is a daft (as opposed to "important") question. You do realise that ? The club doesn't issue shares - they are not, and have never been, floated on any exchange or other market - and buy them back on inventory. All ownership is accounted for...
Mel's shares were distributed proportionally among the existing shareholders. [Post edited 5 Nov 2014 13:43]
|
| Forum
Reply | fao Phil Sumbler
at 12:55 24 Oct 2014
OK, I've seen the film and claiming it's not a vanity project is like saying Disney don't make films for kids. I mean come on.....
It's watchable, I will give you that - but its retelling of history is as skewed as Cameron's opinion on the EU. [Post edited 24 Oct 2014 12:57]
|
| Forum
Reply | It`s all kicking off at Chelsea
at 19:43 14 Sep 2014
Yep. I was also at the f3k and concur. A lot of familiar 'faces' and many of them did not give a great account of themselves.
So it wouldn't surprise me one bit. Bellends... |
| Forum
Reply | Alejandro Pozuelo
at 14:58 24 Jul 2014
He was crap. We're well rid.
Shows how little can be read into "an exciting performance" against De hond en eende, Hoek in preseason... |
| Forum
Reply | £15 for our home friendly
at 14:20 23 Jul 2014
Didn't you say somewhere "I would vote Conservative" very recently ?
Then surely, as a champion of the freeest of free markets, and every man for himself economics, I thought you'd be in a position to fully endorse this idea ?
Surely, one cannot get in the way of the pure science of supply and demand and its influence on pricing ??
Make your mind up ffs !! |
| | Baptist
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 6 | | Comment Votes: | 0 | | Prediction League: | 0 | | TOTAL: | 6 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
