| PSR could be history - where does that leave us? 16:42 - Feb 17 with 739 views | saint901 |
Despite I think 16 clubs voting to keep in place the Premier League PSR rules, as amended following the Man City legal case, it seems that a committee has decided that City were correct. The PSR rules since perhaps 2022 are unenforceable.
Aside from this meaning that most of the financial irregularity charges against City will now be dropped, where is that going to leave the PL?
Whilst there is already a de facto split of the PL into three parts - top 6, next 8/9, bottom 5/6 - mainly being a reflection of the financial power behind the clubs (few exceptions each season perhaps) if clubs are essentially unfettered in how much money their owners can "invest", we will see an acceleration of that split becoming recognised.
I can see top 4 to 6 being in a Euro Super League inside five seasons.
I can see the PL being 18 teams.
I can see the PL being limited in how many teams might get to European cups.
Personally I would welcome that. I think it would make the PL more of a competition and less of a parade. However the PL will hate it because it means less influence and less money. I suspect therefore that this will get very messy.
If however it opens the door to clubs like ours being better able to compete if we ever get promoted again, I'm all for it. |  | | |  |
| PSR could be history - where does that leave us? on 21:05 - Feb 17 with 543 views | sledger |
the psr rules are nothing to do with the 130 charges from 2010.It might make the premier league punishments tougher should they win,dont think they can afford to lose if they do there done | | | |
| PSR could be history - where does that leave us? on 13:16 - Feb 19 with 193 views | arfurdent |
Pl changes are hardly likely to impact SFC's fortunes for a good while |  |
| And the White Knight is talking backwards
And the Red Queen's off with her head |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
