| Match thread 19:35 - Oct 9 with 12617 views | rafc1984 |
Dale XI to face Bury: Smith, Rafferty, Bennett, R Edwards, McIntyre, Cavanagh P Edwards, Grimes, Putterill, Curran, Donnelly
Dale subs: Barry-Murphy, Tutte, Pearson, Craney, Lillis
Bury XI to face Dale: Carson, Skarz, Lockwood, Hughes, Doherty, Schumacher, Byrne, Marshall, Healy Hopper, Bishop
Bury subs: Sweeney, Jones, Cullen, A Jones, Belford |  | | |  |
| Match thread on 13:22 - Oct 10 with 1402 views | MoonyDale |
| Match thread on 12:52 - Oct 10 by TVOS1907 |
Bit harsh to call Harry a clown just because he has a different opinion. |
Might seem harsh I agree, but anyone who can try to compare the two challenges can't have seen them both. |  |
| |
| Match thread on 13:47 - Oct 10 with 1362 views | aleanddale |
ah 4 trialists who currently have no club!!
the shakers fears are all unfounded!! all will be all right now!!.
15 more games until any signings of note can be made and that takes bURY past matchday 24.
Thats over half way into the season and the way the performed last night they could easily be cut adrift by then.
are there 4 worse teams in league1 ?? i doubt it. |  | | |
| Match thread on 13:52 - Oct 10 with 1355 views | Daley_Lama |
New manager
4 unknown triallists
Have a word with Mr Blackwell and tell him theirs a prolific striker at Macclesfield who would love the chance of playing up front for a League 1 outfit, think his initials are MBH or something similar.
In 2017 there will be a book released entitled "Rochdale, the ups and downs of a 10 year love affair"
In 2018 you can get an electronic copy of the above, Ctl + F, Replace Rochdale with Bury and you will have a best seller.
|  |
| |
| Match thread on 13:56 - Oct 10 with 1352 views | maybee |
| Match thread on 13:22 - Oct 10 by MoonyDale |
Might seem harsh I agree, but anyone who can try to compare the two challenges can't have seen them both. |
I had an excellent view of last nights challenge (from the Main Stand, where I could see everything)
It was a stupid challenge from Curren, who had lost the ball due to a poor first touch, and one that in my opinion, he should not have even gone for, as the ball was too near the keeper.
He went in feet first, but appeared to slip somewhat, making contact inevitable, if unintentional.
The ref had little choice other than to send him off. Nearly everyone near me agreed with the decision, but were slightly confused that one or two bury players escaped a caution or worse for their attack on Curren, who they pinned to the floor.
The reaction of bury's players was very poor...especially Carson who over-reacted badly. However, he could have been seriously hurt in what was a stupid challenge.
it wasn't as bad as the Lee Hughes challenge last season, which I saw, but I can understand the comparison.
|  | | |
| Match thread on 14:04 - Oct 10 with 1339 views | MoonyDale |
| Match thread on 13:56 - Oct 10 by maybee |
I had an excellent view of last nights challenge (from the Main Stand, where I could see everything)
It was a stupid challenge from Curren, who had lost the ball due to a poor first touch, and one that in my opinion, he should not have even gone for, as the ball was too near the keeper.
He went in feet first, but appeared to slip somewhat, making contact inevitable, if unintentional.
The ref had little choice other than to send him off. Nearly everyone near me agreed with the decision, but were slightly confused that one or two bury players escaped a caution or worse for their attack on Curren, who they pinned to the floor.
The reaction of bury's players was very poor...especially Carson who over-reacted badly. However, he could have been seriously hurt in what was a stupid challenge.
it wasn't as bad as the Lee Hughes challenge last season, which I saw, but I can understand the comparison.
|
I was no more than 20 feet from the challenge in line with it in the Sandy and Curran did not go in 2 footed, clumsy yes, silly also, but not malicious in any way with no studs showing. | |
| |
| Match thread on 14:22 - Oct 10 with 1316 views | maybee |
| Match thread on 14:04 - Oct 10 by MoonyDale |
I was no more than 20 feet from the challenge in line with it in the Sandy and Curran did not go in 2 footed, clumsy yes, silly also, but not malicious in any way with no studs showing. |
Trouble is... what he did is enough to get a red card.
As I said... there was no need to even make the challenge, and once he committed to it, there was only one option open to the ref. | | | |
| Match thread on 14:37 - Oct 10 with 1293 views | MoonyDale |
| Match thread on 14:22 - Oct 10 by maybee |
Trouble is... what he did is enough to get a red card.
As I said... there was no need to even make the challenge, and once he committed to it, there was only one option open to the ref. |
As I said in an earlier post, the only positive to come out of it is that it wasn't Grimes, the way things are with injuries and suspensions at the moment that would have been hard to take. My anger last night was down to the disgraceful antics of the keeper and defenders, disgusting behaviour. | |
| |
| Match thread on 15:05 - Oct 10 with 1267 views | dingdangblue |
| Match thread on 14:22 - Oct 10 by maybee |
Trouble is... what he did is enough to get a red card.
As I said... there was no need to even make the challenge, and once he committed to it, there was only one option open to the ref. |
The challenge was most probably out of total frustration at his useless 1st touch. He should have had a virtually open net - instead he gave it to the keeper. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Match thread on 16:05 - Oct 10 with 1222 views | TVOS1907 |
| Match thread on 13:02 - Oct 10 by Banned4ever |
hope hes making headway now before December at least . |
So it will be loan players and players nobody else wants? |  |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Match thread on 16:08 - Oct 10 with 1217 views | Yorkshire_Dale |
| Match thread on 10:54 - Oct 10 by dingdangblue |
You are down - nothing more certain - we could see it with ourselves last season - there are not 4 worse teams than you in lge 1. David Healey was awful too. |
Shakers travel to Crawley on Saturday......Mr Barker awaits?
Oh! and that little rascal Nicky is on good form too.........nowt down. | | | |
| Match thread on 16:11 - Oct 10 with 1212 views | TVOS1907 |
| Match thread on 16:08 - Oct 10 by Yorkshire_Dale |
Shakers travel to Crawley on Saturday......Mr Barker awaits?
Oh! and that little rascal Nicky is on good form too.........nowt down. |
Bet they get abused to high heaven as well.
At least Accrington fans know how to show a bit of class. | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Match thread on 17:02 - Oct 10 with 1171 views | aleanddale |
not sure there has been much conversation regarding Accy on Sat but the way they welcomed back JC and JB was first class.
Accy fans i salute you.
was a treat to see and nice to be there to see it.
I really hope Accy do well this year and join us in the top 7 come May. | | | |
| Match thread on 17:17 - Oct 10 with 1152 views | ColDale |
| Match thread on 14:22 - Oct 10 by maybee |
Trouble is... what he did is enough to get a red card.
As I said... there was no need to even make the challenge, and once he committed to it, there was only one option open to the ref. |
I think there has been very few posts if any saying that the ref made a mistake in sending him off. The concern is of a goalkeeper who is lying prostrate due to injury one moment, then kicking the ball with that same leg 30 seconds later, with not one conversation taking place as to whether he was fit enough to take the kick. They knew because the injury was feigned.
None of which had any impact on the eventual outcome. Unless Curran had decided to go in that bit harder, and we could have relied on the ever reliable Mr Belford for the spot kicks.  |  | | |
| Match thread on 17:19 - Oct 10 with 1147 views | MoonyDale |
| Match thread on 17:17 - Oct 10 by ColDale |
I think there has been very few posts if any saying that the ref made a mistake in sending him off. The concern is of a goalkeeper who is lying prostrate due to injury one moment, then kicking the ball with that same leg 30 seconds later, with not one conversation taking place as to whether he was fit enough to take the kick. They knew because the injury was feigned.
None of which had any impact on the eventual outcome. Unless Curran had decided to go in that bit harder, and we could have relied on the ever reliable Mr Belford for the spot kicks. |
Spot on Col... | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:21 - Oct 10 with 1145 views | Harry_Dale |
| Match thread on 13:56 - Oct 10 by maybee |
I had an excellent view of last nights challenge (from the Main Stand, where I could see everything)
It was a stupid challenge from Curren, who had lost the ball due to a poor first touch, and one that in my opinion, he should not have even gone for, as the ball was too near the keeper.
He went in feet first, but appeared to slip somewhat, making contact inevitable, if unintentional.
The ref had little choice other than to send him off. Nearly everyone near me agreed with the decision, but were slightly confused that one or two bury players escaped a caution or worse for their attack on Curren, who they pinned to the floor.
The reaction of bury's players was very poor...especially Carson who over-reacted badly. However, he could have been seriously hurt in what was a stupid challenge.
it wasn't as bad as the Lee Hughes challenge last season, which I saw, but I can understand the comparison.
|
This.
The comparison drawn was a late challenge on the keeper, will always put you in trouble. Studds, no studds / contact, no contact!
Yours,
A.Clown |  | | |
| Match thread on 17:35 - Oct 10 with 1127 views | MoonyDale |
| Match thread on 17:21 - Oct 10 by Harry_Dale |
This.
The comparison drawn was a late challenge on the keeper, will always put you in trouble. Studds, no studds / contact, no contact!
Yours,
A.Clown |
Garbage. | |
| |
| Match thread on 17:43 - Oct 10 with 1119 views | Banned4ever |
| Match thread on 16:05 - Oct 10 by TVOS1907 |
So it will be loan players and players nobody else wants? |
Maybe wait and see. | | | |
| Match thread on 19:50 - Oct 10 with 1055 views | TVOS1907 |
| Match thread on 17:43 - Oct 10 by Banned4ever |
Maybe wait and see. |
Is there a new transfer window that only applies to bury? | |
| When I was your age, I used to enjoy the odd game of tennis. Or was it golf? |
| |
| Match thread on 20:50 - Oct 10 with 1010 views | DaleAwaydayBot |
| Match thread on 19:50 - Oct 10 by TVOS1907 |
Is there a new transfer window that only applies to bury? |
I hope not because then they'd get done once again for fielding ineligible players  |  |
| After 3457 forum posts, 11 news comments & 1 match report....The Rochdale Information Robot were Born!!! |
| |
| Match thread on 07:06 - Oct 11 with 931 views | aleanddale |
| Match thread on 19:50 - Oct 10 by TVOS1907 |
Is there a new transfer window that only applies to bury? |
They are thick as 2 short planks.
I overheard one conversation from a very excited shaker on Tuesday night, it went something like >>
well if we can repeat this win on Saturday 3 points will be a real boost, we will be up and running.
Errrr No. the game finished 1-1 - that would earn you a credible point*.
*unless bury are hoping to sort out all league draws with penalty shoot outs now!!
| | | |
| Match thread on 15:51 - Oct 15 with 779 views | PDIDDY |
| Match thread on 16:11 - Oct 10 by TVOS1907 |
Bet they get abused to high heaven as well.
At least Accrington fans know how to show a bit of class. |
a meeting of the two, six fingered tribes and a love in.......... they'll be presenting you a flag next, unc  |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
