Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 19:19 - Mar 19 with 1039 views | ScoobyDoo |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 12:54 - Mar 19 by somersetsimon | Seems pretty clear from the rule. The player didn't prevent release of the ball or block the keeper's movement. I can only guess that, from the ref's angle, he thought the player was closer to the keeper and blocked the ball while it was still under the keeper's control. |
Have no problem with the rule bud but the officials seem to have. The Et'o incident, it seems the referee didn't see it as he had turned his back to run up the field but I'm sure the 4th official and linesmen did, now being it was a Premiership game you would think one of those beauts would know that said rule but lo and behold no one did anything. | | | |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 20:58 - Mar 19 with 1005 views | waynekerr55 |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 13:24 - Mar 18 by blueytheblue | That player was doing similar all night prior to that - mostly without turning his back. I suspect Lee Mason had just had enough of his antics all night tbf. Stupid play by the Bournemouth player tbh - at that stage of the game we were giving them the ball back anyway. |
All I saw was a load of SQL code when I clicked the list Was the player a programmer by any chance? | |
| |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 21:01 - Mar 19 with 1002 views | NeathJack |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 20:58 - Mar 19 by waynekerr55 | All I saw was a load of SQL code when I clicked the list Was the player a programmer by any chance? |
Why are these Redworm fans bringing other incidents up that have nothing to do with this disallowed goal? | | | |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 21:11 - Mar 19 with 995 views | Uxbridge |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 21:01 - Mar 19 by NeathJack | Why are these Redworm fans bringing other incidents up that have nothing to do with this disallowed goal? |
Because referees base decisions on that rather than the laws of the game of course. | |
| |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 21:14 - Mar 19 with 990 views | ScoobyDoo |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 21:01 - Mar 19 by NeathJack | Why are these Redworm fans bringing other incidents up that have nothing to do with this disallowed goal? |
Neathjack, ah a blast from the past. Still not getting it then Neath? No shock there then. | | | |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 22:40 - Mar 19 with 963 views | blueytheblue |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 21:11 - Mar 19 by Uxbridge | Because referees base decisions on that rather than the laws of the game of course. |
Bit naive to assume referees judge every incident independently - how many times do refs books after a foul and point to other areas of the pitch where the same player committed fouls? The player had been doing worse than that incident all night, had the ref warn him twice. Those previous incidents are obviously going to bias the refs decision. | |
| |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 23:48 - Mar 19 with 953 views | Uxbridge |
Goal disallowed against the Redworms last night on 22:40 - Mar 19 by blueytheblue | Bit naive to assume referees judge every incident independently - how many times do refs books after a foul and point to other areas of the pitch where the same player committed fouls? The player had been doing worse than that incident all night, had the ref warn him twice. Those previous incidents are obviously going to bias the refs decision. |
Given the player did nothing, kicking the ball after a teammate passed to him meets that category. Naive to expect the referee to know the laws of the game? It would seem so. Anyway, good to see you still manage to defend your club in even the most spurious and meaningless examples even when the subject is a point of law rather than a lower league side I didnt even know were playing | |
| |
| |