| Laudrup to QPR on 18:30 - Feb 24 with 9476 views | QuakerJack |
Am I right in thinking if he took this job it would effect his claim against us? |  |
|  |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:49 - Feb 24 with 9254 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 18:30 - Feb 24 by QuakerJack |
Am I right in thinking if he took this job it would effect his claim against us? |
No. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:05 - Feb 24 with 9168 views | Dyfnant |
| Laudrup to QPR on 19:49 - Feb 24 by Shaky |
No. |
Wrong, unless a settlement Is worked out |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:21 - Feb 24 with 9082 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:05 - Feb 24 by Dyfnant |
Wrong, unless a settlement Is worked out |
Whether or not this goes to court has nothing whatsoever to to do with the matter.
Swansea have terminated Laudrup's contract on the - in my view - utterly spurious grounds that he is in breach.
The question of whether there is a breach is a matter of fact.
If it is proven that there is a breach of contract it is then a matter of law whether that breach is material to the contract, and constitutes sufficient grounds to terminate the whole thing.
Notwithstanding all of the that, the fact remains that the contract has been terminated unilaterally by Swansea, and whatever job Laudrup can secure can have no bearing whatsoever on any sums payable on termination under he employment contract with Swansea. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:21 - Feb 24 with 9082 views | monmouth |
| Laudrup to QPR on 18:30 - Feb 24 by QuakerJack |
Am I right in thinking if he took this job it would effect his claim against us? |
Yes, absolutely. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:21 - Feb 24 with 9080 views | perchrockjack |
He s spent all his earnings as a player on a Danish pig farm has he?
QPR and him would be interesting indeed. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:23 - Feb 24 with 9061 views | Darran |
Shaky is wrong though there's nothing new there. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:25 - Feb 24 with 9035 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:23 - Feb 24 by Darran |
Shaky is wrong though there's nothing new there. |
Yah -- I defer to your no doubt vast legal experience. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:26 - Feb 24 with 9025 views | Darran |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:25 - Feb 24 by Shaky |
Yah -- I defer to your no doubt vast legal experience. |
He won't get paid twice and we won't be paying his contract up in full in one lump sum,thats not the way it works. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:27 - Feb 24 with 9011 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:26 - Feb 24 by Darran |
He won't get paid twice and we won't be paying his contract up in full in one lump sum,thats not the way it works. |
If there isn't a satisfactory settlement, that will quite clearly be a matter for the High Court to decide. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:28 - Feb 24 with 9011 views | gibs0n |
Laudrup is famous for not joining a club in the middle of a season.
.....QPR, really doubt that would be interesting. |  | | |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:29 - Feb 24 with 8999 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:28 - Feb 24 by gibs0n |
Laudrup is famous for not joining a club in the middle of a season.
.....QPR, really doubt that would be interesting. |
He always said he'd never leave a club mid-season too. Until we sacked him.
Things change. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:32 - Feb 24 with 8977 views | gibs0n |
"He always said he'd never leave a club mid-season too. Until we sacked him"
One thing is leaving/getting sacked. Another thing is joining. | | | |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:35 - Feb 24 with 8938 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:29 - Feb 24 by exiledclaseboy |
He always said he'd never leave a club mid-season too. Until we sacked him.
Things change. |
3 (the sack) - informal dismissal from employment: he got the sack for swearing
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/sack
Remind me, what were the grounds for Laudrup's sacking again? | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:38 - Feb 24 with 8910 views | fbreath |
Tutu fruity would get on well with the owners at qpr [Post edited 24 Feb 2014 20:46]
|  |
| We are the first Welsh club to reach the Premier League Simples |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:43 - Feb 24 with 8889 views | Dyfnant |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:21 - Feb 24 by Shaky |
Whether or not this goes to court has nothing whatsoever to to do with the matter.
Swansea have terminated Laudrup's contract on the - in my view - utterly spurious grounds that he is in breach.
The question of whether there is a breach is a matter of fact.
If it is proven that there is a breach of contract it is then a matter of law whether that breach is material to the contract, and constitutes sufficient grounds to terminate the whole thing.
Notwithstanding all of the that, the fact remains that the contract has been terminated unilaterally by Swansea, and whatever job Laudrup can secure can have no bearing whatsoever on any sums payable on termination under he employment contract with Swansea. |
He'd be chasing loss of earnings. If he's working this will be taken into account | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:47 - Feb 24 with 8839 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:43 - Feb 24 by Dyfnant |
He'd be chasing loss of earnings. If he's working this will be taken into account |
I am sorry, but you are simply wrong.
Once the club claimed a breach this matter falls firmly under the jurisdiction of law of contract.
The contract will contain certain provisions for payments in the event of a termination of that contract, that ought then be adjusted for the seriousness and relevance of any proven breaches.
And that is it. Nothing more to discuss. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:54 - Feb 24 with 8794 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:47 - Feb 24 by Shaky |
I am sorry, but you are simply wrong.
Once the club claimed a breach this matter falls firmly under the jurisdiction of law of contract.
The contract will contain certain provisions for payments in the event of a termination of that contract, that ought then be adjusted for the seriousness and relevance of any proven breaches.
And that is it. Nothing more to discuss. |
Obviously that assumes that Laudrup doesn't pursue an action for defamation. . . | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:57 - Feb 24 with 8772 views | exiledclaseboy |
So you want to discuss semantics on the definition of the term "sacked" now? It's a colloquial term meaning he no longer has his job. He was dismissed, relieved of his duties, put on gardening leave (which may well actually be the most accurate description of the current situation). Use whichever term you want, the end result is just the same. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:59 - Feb 24 with 8754 views | swanny |
Gotta love a barrack room lawyer.... |  |
| 'Sorry, your password must contain a capital letter, two numbers, a symbol, an inspiring message, a spell, a gang sign, a hieroglyph and the blood of a virgin" |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:06 - Feb 24 with 8697 views | Shaky |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:57 - Feb 24 by exiledclaseboy |
So you want to discuss semantics on the definition of the term "sacked" now? It's a colloquial term meaning he no longer has his job. He was dismissed, relieved of his duties, put on gardening leave (which may well actually be the most accurate description of the current situation). Use whichever term you want, the end result is just the same. |
The point is; what are the grounds?
In the programme notes a few weeks ago, Jenkins apparently said words to the effect that Laudrup threatened the very ethos of the club, but he didn't elaborate.
He has cited breach of contract in the termination of Laudrup's contract, but again offered no details.
Your position if I understand it correctly is that the Board must have had a bloody good reason to sack him - which they technically didn't otherwise they wouldn't be disputing the payout - but you have no idea precisely what that may be.
The whole thing is simply absurd. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:13 - Feb 24 with 8640 views | Darran |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:06 - Feb 24 by Shaky |
The point is; what are the grounds?
In the programme notes a few weeks ago, Jenkins apparently said words to the effect that Laudrup threatened the very ethos of the club, but he didn't elaborate.
He has cited breach of contract in the termination of Laudrup's contract, but again offered no details.
Your position if I understand it correctly is that the Board must have had a bloody good reason to sack him - which they technically didn't otherwise they wouldn't be disputing the payout - but you have no idea precisely what that may be.
The whole thing is simply absurd. |
It's no more absurd than any sacking unless you want it to be if course. | |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:14 - Feb 24 with 8635 views | waynekerr55 |
| Laudrup to QPR on 20:54 - Feb 24 by Shaky |
Obviously that assumes that Laudrup doesn't pursue an action for defamation. . . |
One of the hardest things to prove in court (as you are well aware Mr Shake!) |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:17 - Feb 24 with 8612 views | ScoobyWho |
Laudrup isnt in any frame for QPR or any other club in this country unless they are decidely bigger than the swans. And that wont happen. His ego wont allow it. Next time we see him will be abroad. |  |
| |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:18 - Feb 24 with 8599 views | waynekerr55 |
| Laudrup to QPR on 21:17 - Feb 24 by ScoobyWho |
Laudrup isnt in any frame for QPR or any other club in this country unless they are decidely bigger than the swans. And that wont happen. His ego wont allow it. Next time we see him will be abroad. |
With cross c*ntry Garcia wrecking hamstrings and groins in his path! | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
