| SFC 5th worst ranked in the PL for paying players who don’t play! on 08:21 - Dec 21 with 849 views | kentsouthampton |
We are ranked 1st, not 5th.
"When you're not one of the richest teams in the Premier League, the easiest way to get relegated is to spend about 60% of your player salaries on players who don't even play." |  | |  |
| SFC 5th worst ranked in the PL for paying players who don’t play! on 11:48 - Dec 22 with 568 views | cocklebreath |
| SFC 5th worst ranked in the PL for paying players who don’t play! on 08:21 - Dec 21 by kentsouthampton |
We are ranked 1st, not 5th.
"When you're not one of the richest teams in the Premier League, the easiest way to get relegated is to spend about 60% of your player salaries on players who don't even play." |
This shows just how bad our recruitment has been, we are the worst % of any team, no suprise as we’re run by useless c()nts. |  |
| |
| SFC 5th worst ranked in the PL for paying players who don’t play! on 11:52 - Dec 22 with 560 views | dirk_doone |
New managers typically select 1 or 2 players who were out of favour with the last manager so our position in this table could well improve. |  |
| |
| SFC 5th worst ranked in the PL for paying players who don’t play! on 12:32 - Dec 22 with 500 views | grumpy |
We have some good and not so good players but you must look at the managers we have recently had and their coaches .
The tactics and training have been poor and will not have brought the best out of players.
Very few players that have arrived here over the last few seasons have improved,that tells you something was very wrong. [Post edited 22 Dec 12:33]
|  | | |
| SFC 5th worst ranked in the PL for paying players who don’t play! on 16:34 - Dec 22 with 419 views | InTimeAddedOn |
| SFC 5th worst ranked in the PL for paying players who don’t play! on 08:21 - Dec 21 by kentsouthampton |
We are ranked 1st, not 5th.
"When you're not one of the richest teams in the Premier League, the easiest way to get relegated is to spend about 60% of your player salaries on players who don't even play." |
If we are ranked 1st not 5th then why are Chelsea shown as top of the rankings with a 1. beside their name to denote they are ranked 1st???
Overall, Southampton are ranked 5th as there are two criteria clubs are judged by,
1) They are ranked by the raw value of all of their players unused minutes
and
2) They are ranked by the percentage of their payroll that's going to unused minutes.
To give the overall ranking as shown on the site they combine the two separate criteria to give an overall ranking. So, we are the 5th worst ranked as the site and London Saint rightly say. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
