Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
4.2.4 ???? 18:46 - Jan 20 with 1588 viewsRed_Ranger

I thought we played most of the game in a 4.2.4. with various players dropping into or moving up to the midfield.
It worked.
Marti is the man.
0
4.2.4 ???? on 18:53 - Jan 20 with 1543 viewsBoston

As little as I know about football, I also thought we looked like that.

Poll: Thank God The Seaons Over.

0
4.2.4 ???? on 20:22 - Jan 20 with 1384 viewsLazyFan

It was 4-4-2, a traditional style from back in the day.

Except if one of your big men is also fast, then this can be a real problem for the defence of the oppo as we saw. In addition, Dykes drawing them into the middle where they did not want to go ala Harry Kane style worked well.

If one of the oppo's CB's follows him, then Armstong is 1v1 with space to run into behind, hence all the lobbed balls in the corner. If they don't then Dykes can be an extra person in the middle to feed Chair or Willock. It worked so well in that game that Paal and Cannon didn't even have to come forward so much to do 1:2's to get down the flanks for crosses as they have had done so much in the past. This also means if the oppo gets the ball, then there are few gaps to play players through onto as our whole back 4 is already in place.

Works great, as long as the dropping forward can hold the ball and pass, which Dykes did really well, and the other forward has the pace to run onto the corner lobbed balls, which Armstrong does. If, we can improve that a lot more, I am not sure how defences will be able to counter it.

Everyone drops deep, except Armstrong, Cook or JCS lob it into the corner for Armstrong to run onto 1v1. Or played into Dykes who is free in the middle to then feed out to the wings. This could get us a lot of goals if its doable again. We shall see.

zzzzzzzzzz

0
4.2.4 ???? on 20:31 - Jan 20 with 1365 viewsbaz_qpr

It was 4-1-4-1 I would argue with Field playing deeper and dropping and Dykes pushing into the 10 rollin attack
0
4.2.4 ???? on 20:38 - Jan 20 with 1340 viewsCateLeBonR

Start of second half I thought we tried pushing a higher line. It didn't really work at first. It was an odd game tactically I thought which made both sides make lots of mistakes. We won so who cares.
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024