Crown Oil 22:20 - Nov 13 with 3902 views | Rodingdale | So, with all eyes on Glasgow and COP26. How comfortable a position is it ethically for us to be sponsored by a fossil fuel company? My view is we should be asking them what their stance is in relation to reducing their businesses carbon footprint. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Crown Oil on 22:30 - Nov 13 with 3866 views | Dalenet | Their website, and their scoreboard advertisements at the stadium, outline their approach with their alternative to diesel for example. They are transitioning, as many of us will need to do. But with 90% of our homes fuelled by fossil fuels, and 95% if our cars by oil, we still need distributors of oil based products. Ask me again in 2030 and again in 2050 | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Crown Oil on 22:36 - Nov 13 with 3834 views | EllDale | If we’re talking about the moral high ground I’d rather be sponsored by them than by online bookmakers. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Crown Oil on 22:42 - Nov 13 with 3803 views | Rodingdale |
Crown Oil on 22:36 - Nov 13 by EllDale | If we’re talking about the moral high ground I’d rather be sponsored by them than by online bookmakers. |
And I completely agree with that. That and payday loan companies. And let’s face it Saudi Arabia has just bought Newcastle!! I suppose our fan owned model chimes with doing the right thing, which was the origin of the question. Probably more a brand name challenge for CO than for Dale. | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Crown Oil on 22:51 - Nov 13 with 3765 views | James1980 | .............. And the Earth is flat (I don't think the earth is flat just trying to trump any CC deniers) | ![](/images/avatars/0.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Crown Oil on 23:19 - Nov 13 with 3710 views | IOMDale |
Crown Oil on 22:51 - Nov 13 by James1980 | .............. And the Earth is flat (I don't think the earth is flat just trying to trump any CC deniers) |
Trump Trump, if you will. | ![](/images/avatars/1174.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Crown Oil on 01:08 - Nov 14 with 3600 views | 49thseason |
Crown Oil on 23:19 - Nov 13 by IOMDale | Trump Trump, if you will. |
CO2 is 0.42% of the total atmosphere (420 ppm) The UK is responsible for about 370m tonnes a year, down 40% since 1990, or about 1% of global output...China produces 7.5 tonnes per person. There are1,402,000,000 chinese people and 1100 coal fired power stations in China, so thats 10.5 billion tonnes, or 29% of all CO2 emissions, the US is at 11% and falling and India 6.6 % Ergo, Crown oil is responsible for the square root of FA of CO2 | ![](/images/avatars/1190.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Crown Oil on 08:20 - Nov 14 with 3418 views | AtThePeake | If we could leave out the misogynistic and violent messages about an 18 year old girl with aspergers that would be grand. | ![](/images/avatars/1813.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
Crown Oil on 09:14 - Nov 14 with 3334 views | Shun |
Crown Oil on 08:20 - Nov 14 by AtThePeake | If we could leave out the misogynistic and violent messages about an 18 year old girl with aspergers that would be grand. |
Glad you said it. | ![](/images/avatars/1182.gif) | | ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) | Login to get fewer ads
Crown Oil on 20:03 - Nov 16 with 2574 views | EllGazzell |
Crown Oil on 01:08 - Nov 14 by 49thseason | CO2 is 0.42% of the total atmosphere (420 ppm) The UK is responsible for about 370m tonnes a year, down 40% since 1990, or about 1% of global output...China produces 7.5 tonnes per person. There are1,402,000,000 chinese people and 1100 coal fired power stations in China, so thats 10.5 billion tonnes, or 29% of all CO2 emissions, the US is at 11% and falling and India 6.6 % Ergo, Crown oil is responsible for the square root of FA of CO2 |
Those numbers are unfortunately very simplistic. The UK (and every other countries) number is inextricably linked to the Chinese number. We are all responsible for those Chinese numbers as we all consume "made in China" products. We can't have it both ways: if 'lost to China' production was moved back to Europe or closer to the product's marketplace, then the emissions globally would be better off due to the reduced shipping. I'm not saying the Chinese or Indians are clean or trying to be, but just have a look around your home, and consider all your 'made in China' labelled stuff that you acquired - it's in that 29% + the uncounted shipping CO2 - a lot closer to home than you make out. | ![](/images/avatars/1814.gif) |
| ![](/images/icons/ignore-user.png) |
| |