By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I feel very uneasy with this , we are getting rid of 2 QPR men who love the club and who have worked well ( bar the away games ) to get us being competitive with a young squad , yet again TF getting bored with the stability factor at the club #nextlevel
And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
10
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 15:54 - May 9 with 17415 views
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 15:46 - May 9 by paulparker
I feel very uneasy with this , we are getting rid of 2 QPR men who love the club and who have worked well ( bar the away games ) to get us being competitive with a young squad , yet again TF getting bored with the stability factor at the club #nextlevel
Me, too.
If this is happening I'll want to know a lot more about whether the board and the incoming manager did a deal behind the backs of two QPR men.
"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Probably complete rubbish I talk but in my opinion it honestly feels like most managerial sackings these days are completely decided by Twitter. If Twitter did not exist Holloway would be nice and jolly ready for next season, but because some people on Twitter are 24/7 messaging every single person working for QPR saying "SACK HOLLOWAY". Just gives off a bad vibe. When looking at the reality, Holloway has done his job, got youngsters in, and cut the budget, and cares about the club. Why do we feel the need to sack him, and waste more money?
Twitter fans are sh*te. Same people that basically ruined Arsenal's legacy with their awful fan tv.
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:10 - May 9 by BrianMcCarthy
Me, too.
If this is happening I'll want to know a lot more about whether the board and the incoming manager did a deal behind the backs of two QPR men.
Agree. Although now is the time to change a manager if you're going to do it, and I actually think McClaren will be decent and will benefit our young players, I'm very uncomfortable about this indeed.
Bare bones.
2
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:16 - May 9 with 17088 views
Let's face it, if TF wants a change then this is the 100% the correct time to make the change. McClaren then gets a whole summer and pre-season to get his shit together. Feel bad for Holloway as you can imagine he still wants to manage the club but he can walk away with his head held high knowing he met the objective given to him and no doubt, back into punditry.
[Post edited 9 May 2018 16:17]
6
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:33 - May 9 with 16890 views
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:10 - May 9 by RANGERS4EVER
Probably complete rubbish I talk but in my opinion it honestly feels like most managerial sackings these days are completely decided by Twitter. If Twitter did not exist Holloway would be nice and jolly ready for next season, but because some people on Twitter are 24/7 messaging every single person working for QPR saying "SACK HOLLOWAY". Just gives off a bad vibe. When looking at the reality, Holloway has done his job, got youngsters in, and cut the budget, and cares about the club. Why do we feel the need to sack him, and waste more money?
Twitter fans are sh*te. Same people that basically ruined Arsenal's legacy with their awful fan tv.
I don't think the club are taken in that easily any more. As I mentioned in another thread, Ruben is aware of the Twitter vitriol and the people who are spewing it 24/7. I would imagine it would be the easiest thing for the club to cross reference those names with the names on the QPR database to see if they are supporters or just gobshites with never a good word to say about the club and wanting something different to what we have all the time. As with any business, the key players will have set short term and long term goals in place and it could well be that IH has exceeded expectations and brought the plan forward by a season hence the need to move to the purported next stage of the long term plan. It may all still come to naught but it may also be the next step to getting QPR back on it's feet again.
The grass is always greener.
0
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:46 - May 9 with 16748 views
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:33 - May 9 by Esox_Lucius
I don't think the club are taken in that easily any more. As I mentioned in another thread, Ruben is aware of the Twitter vitriol and the people who are spewing it 24/7. I would imagine it would be the easiest thing for the club to cross reference those names with the names on the QPR database to see if they are supporters or just gobshites with never a good word to say about the club and wanting something different to what we have all the time. As with any business, the key players will have set short term and long term goals in place and it could well be that IH has exceeded expectations and brought the plan forward by a season hence the need to move to the purported next stage of the long term plan. It may all still come to naught but it may also be the next step to getting QPR back on it's feet again.
I wouldn't be so sure. Just listen to how many times Fernandes references the stick he gets on there. He reads it, it effects him, he is influenced by it.
2
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:49 - May 9 with 16705 views
i have to say that ian holloway has done a good job since he came back...hes stabilised the club..got rid of the big earners and giving the young players the chance......hes done his job and leaves with his head held high.....thank you IH and MB.
6
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:49 - May 9 with 16701 views
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:09 - May 9 by enfieldargh
is Lee Carssley the guy who was at Brentford became temp manager and did a really good job but wanted to stay with the u23's?
Yeah sort of, he was temp and they were great under him for the 5 odd matches he managed them, then Smith came in and he left. He was assistant to Steve Cotterill at Brum which must be quite the job. He's also worked under Aidy Boothroyd (who recruited him for the U21's), so his home life must be awful.
ask Beavis I get nothing Butthead
2
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:51 - May 9 with 16681 views
Well Hoos has said the budgets were based on 10th place. Sir Les is the one I credit with bringing down the wage bill. Holloway only introduced the youngsters when forced to and immediately dropped them next game. He also persisted with the wrong tactics and ignored Furlong for far too long. We have also lost 700 on the official average home attendance.
0
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:58 - May 9 with 16593 views
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:12 - May 9 by Antti_Heinola
Agree. Although now is the time to change a manager if you're going to do it, and I actually think McClaren will be decent and will benefit our young players, I'm very uncomfortable about this indeed.
And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
0
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 17:01 - May 9 with 16547 views
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 16:51 - May 9 by DavieQPR
Well Hoos has said the budgets were based on 10th place. Sir Les is the one I credit with bringing down the wage bill. Holloway only introduced the youngsters when forced to and immediately dropped them next game. He also persisted with the wrong tactics and ignored Furlong for far too long. We have also lost 700 on the official average home attendance.
Yes to this!
0
McClaren Agreed Terms? on 17:01 - May 9 with 16544 views
If I recall correctly, on Sky as an "expert" for the Fulham away game, Mclaren came across to me as being very pro Rangers. Memory tells me that he had to work hard not to refer to us as "we".
Could it be that this has been in the air since before that match?