| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread 18:11 - Jun 18 with 16040 views | bluey_the_blue |
Runners and riders...
Boris Johnson - 126
Jeremy Hunt — 46
Michael Gove — 41
Dominic Raab — 30
Sajid Javid — 33
Rory Stewart — 37
Definite tactical voting went on there; Raab out which is to surprise to anyone.
Stewart's still in there, not made any major gain though with all still to play for. [Post edited 18 Jun 2019 18:17]
|  | | |  |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 19:20 - Jun 19 with 1369 views | bluey_the_blue |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 19:18 - Jun 19 by exiledclaseboy |
Yeah that deserves a lol. Keep at it though, it’s amusing. |
Didn't say it would happen, skippy. It's not impossible. | | | |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 19:22 - Jun 19 with 1369 views | exiledclaseboy |
Who do the sensible Brexit Tories vote for now? The “no to no deal” ultras? Clarke, Green, Stewart himself? There are others. There’s no one left for them. Even Hunt (“Theresa in trousers” as I heard him referred to earlier) has veered towards to “no deal if we have to” route over the last few days.
Might see some abstentions in tomorrow’s ballot(s). |  |
| |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 19:22 - Jun 19 with 1368 views | exiledclaseboy |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 19:20 - Jun 19 by bluey_the_blue |
Didn't say it would happen, skippy. It's not impossible. |
Yeah but still. Lol | |
| |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 19:43 - Jun 19 with 1325 views | Kilkennyjack |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 18:12 - Jun 19 by BrynCartwright |
Rory out of the race, and it's official....The Tories are dead. Well done David Cameron on fecking things up royally. |
MI6 will be feckin furious ... 😡 |  |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 20:46 - Jun 19 with 1280 views | exiledclaseboy |
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/jun/19/the-guardian-view-on-tory-
For a country that takes pride in the venerable stability of its democracy, Britain is strangely prone to constitutional improvisations. For example, if the current Conservative party leadership contest proceeds as far as a ballot of party members, it will be the first time a prime minister is chosen by that method.
In 2016, Theresa May’s rivals withdrew before the final round. In previous applications of the rules it was the leader of the opposition being chosen, not a head of government. The system itself only dates back to 1998. Fine-tuning of the rules was completed by the 1922 Committee just three weeks ago. The process looks undemocratic and has no basis in ancient precedent.
The antique aspect is the Tories’ sense of entitlement to power. The Conservative party has been around so long as to have become intertwined with ideas of established authority, constitutional order and the natural way of doing things — at least in the imaginations of many Tories. But there is no reason for others to indulge that cultural conflation of party and state.
The only sign that Conservatives are embarrassed by their exorbitant privilege in appointing the next prime minister is the decision to hold televised hustings, parading candidates before a wider public in a simulation of accountability. But the debate format exposed the perversity of the whole affair. It mimicked a general election but without the element of universal suffrage. Perhaps the broadcasts influenced MPs’ decisions, but the elimination of Rory Stewart from the third round on Wednesday evening suggests that they are not overly concerned with the opinions of non-Tories, towards whom Mr Stewart’s candidacy was most effectively geared.
It defies principles of democratic representation that 160,000 Conservative members, a cohort that is much richer, older and whiter than the general population, should impose their choice on the rest. There would be equivalent problems if Labour had a leadership contest while in power. There is an awkward tension between rulebooks written to enhance internal party democracy and the logic of a parliamentary democracy that locates a prime minister’s mandate in the Commons, with MPs as the channel for transmitting the popular will.
This problem has turned acute for three reasons. First, the keys to Downing Street are changing hands in a hung parliament. Theresa May’s mandate is flimsy enough before being passed on to a successor. Second, parliament’s authority has been sabotaged by the 2016 referendum — an ill-conceived experiment in direct democracy that landed a ferociously complex task in the lap of a reluctant representative chamber. Third, the Fixed-term Parliaments Act limits the prospects for an early election, the traditional pressure valve when governments cease to function.
To appoint a prime minister without a credible national mandate would be awkward in less volatile times. To do it three months before Britain’s EU membership expires, when half of the country might prefer not to leave, places immense strain on the legitimacy of the system. And to put the responsibility for managing that risk in the hands of someone as divisive and provocative as Boris Johnson threatens a full-blown crisis. It will certainly increase the pressure for a general election. If enough moderate Tories withhold support from a Johnson-led administration (as some have said they would, should a no-deal Brexit be on the agenda), he might not command a majority in the Commons. It is a grave decision for the crown to appoint a prime minister if it is uncertain that such a key requirement is met.
These are not abstract issues. British politics functions by a complex operation of law, protocol, convention, precedent, habit and uncodified norms of decent conduct. Brexit has thrown the whole edifice off kilter, imperilling a delicate balance that sustains British democracy. The Tory leadership contest is being properly conducted, to the extent that the rules are being followed. But it is being held without adequate regard for the wider electorate; and without regard for what is at stake if the ultimate winner radiates contempt for the millions who have no say in his election. | |
| |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:32 - Jun 19 with 1206 views | jackonicko |
I think the world may have just come to an end. A Guardian editorial that I agree with! |  | | |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:40 - Jun 19 with 1196 views | exiledclaseboy |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:32 - Jun 19 by jackonicko |
I think the world may have just come to an end. A Guardian editorial that I agree with! |
Good lord. Aren’t you quite the blast from the (fairly recent) past. | |
| |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:42 - Jun 19 with 1192 views | londonlisa2001 |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:32 - Jun 19 by jackonicko |
I think the world may have just come to an end. A Guardian editorial that I agree with! |
Bloody hell. How are you? | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:53 - Jun 19 with 1183 views | jackonicko |
Ha. Yes, that’s true. Back in the UK for a bit as my father passed away.
Been an amused observer from afar! | | | |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:57 - Jun 19 with 1179 views | londonlisa2001 |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:53 - Jun 19 by jackonicko |
Ha. Yes, that’s true. Back in the UK for a bit as my father passed away.
Been an amused observer from afar! |
Sorry to hear that it’s such sad news that’s brought you back. | | | |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 23:02 - Jun 19 with 1173 views | jackonicko |
Thanks Lisa. Cancer is a horrid thing.
I can only get Sky News in Singapore so I’ve been enjoying catching the leadership debates on BBC and C4 since I’ve been back . I can’t believe this Brexit thing is still going!
I’ve only been gone three years, but it’s looking like three prime ministers, two Swans chairman and about six managers whilst I’ve been away! | | | |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 23:05 - Jun 19 with 1171 views | DJack |
| *OFFICIAL* BBC Tory leadership debate thread on 22:53 - Jun 19 by jackonicko |
Ha. Yes, that’s true. Back in the UK for a bit as my father passed away.
Been an amused observer from afar! |
Sorry to hear about your father...but Singapore has a bloody good internet you could have used to post on here. |  |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
