 | Your
Report | Queens Park Rangers v Leeds United Your Report added at 10:29:23
Starting 11 all got 7’s from me except for Field and Chair who got 8’s. Can’t really decide on a MOTM, I thought Field at the time but has to be Chair really on reflection. 4-0 bloody hell! |
| Your
Report | Queens Park Rangers v Preston North End Your Report added at 22:01:58
I thought it was a 7/10 team performance overall but only gave JCS a 7 and MOM.
6’s all the way otherwise except Paal who I gave a 5 (perhaps harshly). I was tempted to give Dykes MOM just for scoring but we need so much more from him and he knows it.
I look forward to reading the match report, think the words will fly off the pen for Clive in his report. An enjoyable and important win.
Special mention to Marti and Xavi. What a turnaround and so many subtle little changes in our defence today which I’ve rarely if ever seen, even when we were good. |
| Your
Report | Queens Park Rangers v West Bromwich Albion Your Report added at 12:24:13
Agree about Paal and Smyth Geoff78. They had what I’d describe ‘quiet’ games but the overall standard was very good so 6/10 deserved. The 10/10 for Field was slightly tongue in cheek. Perhaps if he’d got the hattrick ;) |
| Your
Report | Stoke City v Queens Park Rangers Your Report added at 22:48:19
I had Kenny Paal as my MOM, judging from my iPad stream.
I didn't really notice our centre backs. More of that. Laird was better than i've seen him for a while.
Sam Field and Tim were either good or lucky or well coached.
Chair gave the ball away too much. Lowe and Lyndon and Albert were decent.
Seny's fingertip save that wasn't possibly pivotal.
|
| Your
Report | Queens Park Rangers v Norwich City Your Report added at 12:23:21
We started quite well and got the first goal for a change. I'm not sure how much that was down to good play from us or poor tactics by them. Dykes took his chance well but he won't score many easier goals with their defence completely absent.
I'm not sure what their manager said to them during that wierd first half drinks break (is that an actual thing now?) but Norwich were much more of a threat after that. More cohesive going forward but still quite weak in the press and looked vulnerable at the back.
Second half started in the worst possible way of course. I felt Paal could have been quicker to the ball for their goal after Diengs parry. After that we still created some half chances never really looked like scoring. Although Tim's shot was closer to going in than I thought at the time. Norwich looked the more likely to score at the end but I didn't really think either team did enough to win and a draw the fair result. |
| | CateLeBonR
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 784 | | Comment Votes: | 0 | | Prediction League: | 3 | | TOTAL: | 787 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.