Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Rwanda 10:21 - Nov 15 with 33830 viewsraynor94

Supreme court has ruled its illegal.

That's a lot of money down the drain, awaiting a comment from Suella

You give it out, you take it back it`s all part of the game
Poll: Happy to see Martin go

0
Rwanda on 10:35 - Nov 15 with 10951 viewsbuilthjack

Wasn't slippy Rishi the person behind it?
Another mammoth cock up.

Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.

0
Rwanda on 10:49 - Nov 15 with 10947 viewsJoesus_Of_Narbereth

Rwanda on 10:35 - Nov 15 by builthjack

Wasn't slippy Rishi the person behind it?
Another mammoth cock up.


Think priti Patel was around then

Poll: We all dream of a managerial team of Alan Tates?

0
Rwanda on 11:11 - Nov 15 with 10922 viewsmax936

Add it to the trillions that this useless Government have wasted and given away in nefarious contracts to their mates.

Poll: Will it Snow this coming Winter

2
Rwanda on 17:23 - Nov 15 with 10849 viewssP7qupUf

The ranting by certain Tory MPs is worrying. Judges branded as "Enemies of the People" , constantly banging on about "Lefty Lawyers" and slamming the civil service. They do not seem to understand that the principles of democracy is based on the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary being independent of each other. when they are all controlled by the government we have..... a dictatorship!! Wonder if they would be happy if a Labour Government wanted to establish left wing policies that they did not like by similar means.
1
Rwanda on 17:25 - Nov 15 with 10847 viewsJoesus_Of_Narbereth

Rwanda on 17:23 - Nov 15 by sP7qupUf

The ranting by certain Tory MPs is worrying. Judges branded as "Enemies of the People" , constantly banging on about "Lefty Lawyers" and slamming the civil service. They do not seem to understand that the principles of democracy is based on the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary being independent of each other. when they are all controlled by the government we have..... a dictatorship!! Wonder if they would be happy if a Labour Government wanted to establish left wing policies that they did not like by similar means.


Give it a year and we’ll find out.

Poll: We all dream of a managerial team of Alan Tates?

0
Rwanda on 17:35 - Nov 15 with 10802 viewscontroversial_jack

Rwanda on 17:23 - Nov 15 by sP7qupUf

The ranting by certain Tory MPs is worrying. Judges branded as "Enemies of the People" , constantly banging on about "Lefty Lawyers" and slamming the civil service. They do not seem to understand that the principles of democracy is based on the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary being independent of each other. when they are all controlled by the government we have..... a dictatorship!! Wonder if they would be happy if a Labour Government wanted to establish left wing policies that they did not like by similar means.


It's fascism, plain and simple
1
Rwanda on 17:42 - Nov 15 with 10834 viewsKilkennyjack

Rwanda on 17:23 - Nov 15 by sP7qupUf

The ranting by certain Tory MPs is worrying. Judges branded as "Enemies of the People" , constantly banging on about "Lefty Lawyers" and slamming the civil service. They do not seem to understand that the principles of democracy is based on the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary being independent of each other. when they are all controlled by the government we have..... a dictatorship!! Wonder if they would be happy if a Labour Government wanted to establish left wing policies that they did not like by similar means.


Well said.

Beware of the Risen People

0
Rwanda on 17:46 - Nov 15 with 10829 viewsKilkennyjack

Rwanda on 17:35 - Nov 15 by controversial_jack

It's fascism, plain and simple


The nobbling of the BBC, the press, they lied to the Queen, labelled judges as enemies of the people, introduced vip lanes for mates during a national crises, trashed the economy, and compromised the police.

Send them posh b@stards to Rwanda instead.

Beware of the Risen People

0
Login to get fewer ads

Rwanda on 18:07 - Nov 15 with 10813 viewsAnotherJohn

Rwanda on 17:23 - Nov 15 by sP7qupUf

The ranting by certain Tory MPs is worrying. Judges branded as "Enemies of the People" , constantly banging on about "Lefty Lawyers" and slamming the civil service. They do not seem to understand that the principles of democracy is based on the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary being independent of each other. when they are all controlled by the government we have..... a dictatorship!! Wonder if they would be happy if a Labour Government wanted to establish left wing policies that they did not like by similar means.


"democracy is based on the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary being independent of each other."

Independent in some senses, yes, but each branch has a role into which the other branches should not stray. The judiciary cannot over-rule law made by the legislature, although it can adjudicate on whether new laws are compatible with the framework of law that already exists.

https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/our-justice-system/jud-acc-ind/judg

The democratic process works through the election of the legislators rather than the election of judges, and so there is disquiet in some quarters about "judicial activism" and the apparent incursion of law into the domain of politics (remember Jonathan Sumption's 2019 Reith lectures).

The Supreme Court's judgement will be controversial because it does not so much depend on legal interpretation of the doctrine of non-refoulement, as a judgement about Rwanda's human rights record, its safety as a place of refuge, and the Rwanda government's trustworthiness to meet the terms of the MOU.
0
Rwanda on 19:12 - Nov 15 with 10768 viewsKilkennyjack

Rwanda on 18:07 - Nov 15 by AnotherJohn

"democracy is based on the Legislative, Executive and Judiciary being independent of each other."

Independent in some senses, yes, but each branch has a role into which the other branches should not stray. The judiciary cannot over-rule law made by the legislature, although it can adjudicate on whether new laws are compatible with the framework of law that already exists.

https://www.judiciary.uk/about-the-judiciary/our-justice-system/jud-acc-ind/judg

The democratic process works through the election of the legislators rather than the election of judges, and so there is disquiet in some quarters about "judicial activism" and the apparent incursion of law into the domain of politics (remember Jonathan Sumption's 2019 Reith lectures).

The Supreme Court's judgement will be controversial because it does not so much depend on legal interpretation of the doctrine of non-refoulement, as a judgement about Rwanda's human rights record, its safety as a place of refuge, and the Rwanda government's trustworthiness to meet the terms of the MOU.


Its unlawful. Fact.

The judges have decided.
The law is the law.

Elected uk governments made these laws.
They apply to us all.

Beware of the Risen People

0
Rwanda on 19:46 - Nov 15 with 10747 viewshowenjack

There again If it's good enough for the Arsenal .............
2
Rwanda on 20:41 - Nov 15 with 10709 viewsmajorraglan

I think most people with half a brain could see this coming, it’s another example of poorly thought out legislation from our government.
Makes you wonder why they didn’t see this coming, or is it a case of they knew it was coming and were devoid of other ideas so pressed ahead regardless so as to be able to blame the judges? The government can afford the best legal brains, so it’s a bit odd.
0
Rwanda on 20:50 - Nov 15 with 10696 viewsAnotherJohn

Rwanda on 19:12 - Nov 15 by Kilkennyjack

Its unlawful. Fact.

The judges have decided.
The law is the law.

Elected uk governments made these laws.
They apply to us all.


There can be no doubt that the Supreme Court is able to rule a course of action unlawful. My claim was only that this will be seen as a controversial judgement.

If in cases like this it was really as simple as "the law is the law", a lot of extremely well-paid lawyers would be casting around for other jobs.
0
Rwanda on 20:59 - Nov 15 with 10681 viewsWhiterockin

Rwanda on 17:25 - Nov 15 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth

Give it a year and we’ll find out.


If they try to push ahead with legislation after they have been told its unacceptable, it won't be a year. I think it will be the final straw, the backlash from the country will be more than the government can handle and there could be a snap election in January. Basically they will throw in the towel.
0
Rwanda on 21:32 - Nov 15 with 10641 viewsFlashberryjack

Rwanda on 20:59 - Nov 15 by Whiterockin

If they try to push ahead with legislation after they have been told its unacceptable, it won't be a year. I think it will be the final straw, the backlash from the country will be more than the government can handle and there could be a snap election in January. Basically they will throw in the towel.


I think the majority of the people of the UK agree with sending people that enter the UK illegally be sent to Rwanda.

There must be something wrong when a democratically government can't pass laws to protect it's own borders.

Hello
Poll: Should the Senedd be Abolished

1
Rwanda on 22:17 - Nov 15 with 10601 viewsmajorraglan

Rwanda on 21:32 - Nov 15 by Flashberryjack

I think the majority of the people of the UK agree with sending people that enter the UK illegally be sent to Rwanda.

There must be something wrong when a democratically government can't pass laws to protect it's own borders.


Incompetence? The government know the law and they’ve got top barristers and legal brains working on this. Given the importance of the issue in the public eye anyone with half a brain would have hedged their bets and had a couple of different teams working on the different scenarios and options. Yes it costs money to employee several different sets of lawyers, but in the grand scheme of things its chicken feed.
0
Rwanda on 22:30 - Nov 15 with 10587 viewsJoesus_Of_Narbereth

Who in their right mind could have possibly surmised that some poverty stricken country ravaged by civil war, rampant corruption and one of the worst and most recent genocides in human history is a safe country?

Poll: We all dream of a managerial team of Alan Tates?

3
Rwanda on 22:42 - Nov 15 with 10582 viewsmajorraglan

Rwanda on 22:30 - Nov 15 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth

Who in their right mind could have possibly surmised that some poverty stricken country ravaged by civil war, rampant corruption and one of the worst and most recent genocides in human history is a safe country?


I dare say the significant amount of cash we’ve sent has found its way in to the Swiss bank accounts of some of the Rwandan movers and shakers.
0
Rwanda on 22:46 - Nov 15 with 10579 viewsBoundy

Rwanda on 22:30 - Nov 15 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth

Who in their right mind could have possibly surmised that some poverty stricken country ravaged by civil war, rampant corruption and one of the worst and most recent genocides in human history is a safe country?


If it wasn't so serious it would considered a dark sinister farce , but then again how many Home Secretary's has it been now ?

"In a free society, the State is the servant of the people—not the master."

0
Rwanda on 23:20 - Nov 15 with 10556 viewsonehunglow

Rwanda on 21:32 - Nov 15 by Flashberryjack

I think the majority of the people of the UK agree with sending people that enter the UK illegally be sent to Rwanda.

There must be something wrong when a democratically government can't pass laws to protect it's own borders.


Refugees welcome, whoever they are eh

Poll: Christmas. Enjoyable or not

0
Rwanda on 06:19 - Nov 16 with 10513 viewsWhiterockin

Rwanda on 21:32 - Nov 15 by Flashberryjack

I think the majority of the people of the UK agree with sending people that enter the UK illegally be sent to Rwanda.

There must be something wrong when a democratically government can't pass laws to protect it's own borders.


I think you are wrong.
0
Rwanda on 08:54 - Nov 16 with 10478 viewsGwyn737

Rwanda on 06:19 - Nov 16 by Whiterockin

I think you are wrong.


Polls this morning show that the Tories are at their lowest levels since Truss.

I don't think spending another year trying to deport a few hundred people to a dictatorship will sort it all out though.

Bearing in mind:

1. The court judgement was clear = leaving the ECHR will not help
2. There's now way they'll get it through parliament.
3. Even if they did, the Lord's would block it.

They've far more effective things they could be doing.
0
Rwanda on 09:09 - Nov 16 with 10475 viewsAnotherJohn

Rwanda on 22:30 - Nov 15 by Joesus_Of_Narbereth

Who in their right mind could have possibly surmised that some poverty stricken country ravaged by civil war, rampant corruption and one of the worst and most recent genocides in human history is a safe country?


What may surprise some of you is that the World Health Organisation (a UN organisation) and other influential international bodies like the ILO and USAID see Rwanda as a bit of an African poster child when it comes to health care. Before the issue of asylum seekers hit the news the discourse about progress made since the internal strife was quite different.

https://www.afro.who.int/news/rwanda-beacon-universal-health-coverage-africa

https://ncdalliance.org/news-events/news/rwanda-ncd-alliance-receives-prestigiou

https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/gess/RessourcePDF.action?ressource.ressou

https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JNFP.pdf

https://www.ifpma.org/insights/how-do-we-forge-a-shared-path-toward-universal-he

https://theconversation.com/over-90-of-rwandans-have-health-insurance-the-health

https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2019/08/29/paul-kagame-transforming-a-continent-with-u


Given that most African countries have less developed healthcare systems is there anywhere on that continent that left-liberal opinion would deem a safe destination for asylum seekers?
[Post edited 16 Nov 2023 9:13]
1
Rwanda on 09:34 - Nov 16 with 10457 viewsjohnlangy

Rwanda on 21:32 - Nov 15 by Flashberryjack

I think the majority of the people of the UK agree with sending people that enter the UK illegally be sent to Rwanda.

There must be something wrong when a democratically government can't pass laws to protect it's own borders.


The majority ? Maybe, maybe not.

Every government minister when talking about Rwanda says that sending asylum seekers there will stop the small boats.

Could someone explain to me why sending 500 of them to Rwanda will act as a deterrent to the 45,000 or so that are coming this year. And the 45,000 that may very well come next year.

Genuine question. Perhaps there's an agreement in place that when the initial 500 are sent there then there will be a huge expansion of the scheme. If there is i've not heard of it.
0
Rwanda on 10:10 - Nov 16 with 10417 viewsAnotherJohn

Rwanda on 09:34 - Nov 16 by johnlangy

The majority ? Maybe, maybe not.

Every government minister when talking about Rwanda says that sending asylum seekers there will stop the small boats.

Could someone explain to me why sending 500 of them to Rwanda will act as a deterrent to the 45,000 or so that are coming this year. And the 45,000 that may very well come next year.

Genuine question. Perhaps there's an agreement in place that when the initial 500 are sent there then there will be a huge expansion of the scheme. If there is i've not heard of it.


The government's argument is about deterrent effect rather than overseas processing for all arrivals, and i suppose one would have to say that whether this will work is an empirical question. The situation with Albanians, where the number of arrivals is sharply down this year, might give a clue. Last year about a quarter of cross channel arrivals (or around 10.000 persons) were Albanians. Since the agreement took effect in December 2022, the UK government returned around 1000 and that seems enough to stem the inward flow. The 1000 returns includes illegal arrivals by all routes - which came to about 16000 in 2022.
[Post edited 16 Nov 2023 10:15]
1
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024