Southampton 09:33 - Sep 16 with 2350 views | Plankton | We tried to tell you | | | | |
Southampton on 09:36 - Sep 16 with 2330 views | onehunglow | It really is time to move on though it’s hard looking at what this individual did and is doing . We were taken in,as have been Soton. Fin | |
| |
Southampton on 09:52 - Sep 16 with 2302 views | KeithHaynes |
Southampton on 09:36 - Sep 16 by onehunglow | It really is time to move on though it’s hard looking at what this individual did and is doing . We were taken in,as have been Soton. Fin |
It’s easy to to say we, when you mean you. | |
| |
Southampton on 10:23 - Sep 16 with 2248 views | KeithHaynes | Bearing in mind they are seventh with three wins from six. More entitled premier league fans. | |
| |
Southampton on 11:15 - Sep 16 with 2199 views | JACKMANANDBOY | At risk of stating the obvious, the resources and expectation associated with a relegated Premier League team means Martin won't be able to repeat the pattern of results he delivered at MK Don's and with us. | |
| |
Southampton on 12:00 - Sep 16 with 2125 views | onehunglow |
Southampton on 09:52 - Sep 16 by KeithHaynes | It’s easy to to say we, when you mean you. |
It’s just grammatical nuances Keith. I could have used “one” or indeed “ you” ( vous” but I try to keep it tidy Put it this way,many were taken in. There ya go. | |
| |
Southampton on 13:26 - Sep 16 with 2036 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
Southampton on 12:00 - Sep 16 by onehunglow | It’s just grammatical nuances Keith. I could have used “one” or indeed “ you” ( vous” but I try to keep it tidy Put it this way,many were taken in. There ya go. |
I never feel comfortable saying "we" because I am not an owner of Swansea city. Members of the Trust can say this as they notionally own 11% of the club. The members are at fault for not auditing their leadership in the period 2014-2022. Their strategy was 'bonkers'. The members were passive due to a lack of self confidence perhaps? I have a gripe with Martin as he jumped ship. He is now telling SFC that he needs time. At Swansea he was given a lot of time and seemed to be improving very slowly. Perhaps he needed another season. If he believes his own principles he would have rejected SFC and continued his holy quest. Duff has the potential to prove to the US owners he is better by finishing higher than Martin this season. Marti was alway looking for "big transfer windows". His problem was defence and he had his players in place. Fisher , Sorinola, Wood, Darling plus Cabango he helped bring through. The january "catastrophe" was a diversion away from Martin players performing badly. [Post edited 16 Sep 2023 14:04]
| |
| |
Southampton on 13:30 - Sep 16 with 2031 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
Southampton on 09:52 - Sep 16 by KeithHaynes | It’s easy to to say we, when you mean you. |
The poster is a member of the Royal Family. I think poster meant to say we as one would say I rather than you when he meant me. [Post edited 16 Sep 2023 13:34]
| |
| |
Southampton on 14:10 - Sep 16 with 1945 views | onehunglow |
Southampton on 13:26 - Sep 16 by ReslovenSwan1 | I never feel comfortable saying "we" because I am not an owner of Swansea city. Members of the Trust can say this as they notionally own 11% of the club. The members are at fault for not auditing their leadership in the period 2014-2022. Their strategy was 'bonkers'. The members were passive due to a lack of self confidence perhaps? I have a gripe with Martin as he jumped ship. He is now telling SFC that he needs time. At Swansea he was given a lot of time and seemed to be improving very slowly. Perhaps he needed another season. If he believes his own principles he would have rejected SFC and continued his holy quest. Duff has the potential to prove to the US owners he is better by finishing higher than Martin this season. Marti was alway looking for "big transfer windows". His problem was defence and he had his players in place. Fisher , Sorinola, Wood, Darling plus Cabango he helped bring through. The january "catastrophe" was a diversion away from Martin players performing badly. [Post edited 16 Sep 2023 14:04]
|
The “ we” is surely a generic term for a fan base ,not individuals . | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Southampton on 14:19 - Sep 16 with 1939 views | SullutaCreturned |
Southampton on 09:52 - Sep 16 by KeithHaynes | It’s easy to to say we, when you mean you. |
He can't mean himelf when from the very beginning he was against him! In fact he got pelters for not giving him any chance from the beginning. Southampton fans are obviously a touch more reactive than us but guess what, to heck with them and Russell Martin. If he ruins them he's just doing us a favour. | | | |
Southampton on 14:25 - Sep 16 with 1915 views | onehunglow |
Southampton on 14:19 - Sep 16 by SullutaCreturned | He can't mean himelf when from the very beginning he was against him! In fact he got pelters for not giving him any chance from the beginning. Southampton fans are obviously a touch more reactive than us but guess what, to heck with them and Russell Martin. If he ruins them he's just doing us a favour. |
One man’s pelters ….! Nobody likes to be proven wrong after trusting. It’s horrible . | |
| |
Southampton on 18:38 - Sep 16 with 1784 views | lifelong |
Southampton on 14:19 - Sep 16 by SullutaCreturned | He can't mean himelf when from the very beginning he was against him! In fact he got pelters for not giving him any chance from the beginning. Southampton fans are obviously a touch more reactive than us but guess what, to heck with them and Russell Martin. If he ruins them he's just doing us a favour. |
He’ll keep on about it for the next 5 years. | | | |
Southampton on 20:01 - Sep 16 with 1697 views | onehunglow |
Southampton on 18:38 - Sep 16 by lifelong | He’ll keep on about it for the next 5 years. |
I’d be happy to still be with us for five years Assume nothing boys ,nothing. It’s only opinions Nobody is going to war Got that | |
| |
Southampton on 05:53 - Sep 17 with 1474 views | jack247 | Wish Barnsley had told us | | | |
| |