Loan Players 23:36 - Aug 17 with 2897 views | Al_Bundy | Hopefully the owners would have watched us tonight (or are they partying in DC Utd winning a game) to see quite clearly we need decent loan recruits for the spine of the side. The kids did well but this could go very pear shape when we get injuries and suspensions if we continue with what we have. | | | | |
Loan Players on 23:42 - Aug 17 with 2869 views | Badlands | We can only bring in players who are willing to come. | |
| |
Loan Players on 23:42 - Aug 17 with 2866 views | Fireboy2 | I will be absolutely shocked if we get 2 loan signings even though we need a5 least 4 | | | |
Loan Players on 23:50 - Aug 17 with 2830 views | sideline | doubt they watched the game,they still shaking they cocks at the tv watching roony. | | | |
Loan Players on 00:04 - Aug 18 with 2795 views | DJack |
Loan Players on 23:42 - Aug 17 by Badlands | We can only bring in players who are willing to come. |
BULLSHIT, even though it is against what I believe and even more importantly what Potter believes, if you pay a player (his agent) enough then he will play for you. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
Loan Players on 00:05 - Aug 18 with 2790 views | Fireboy2 |
Loan Players on 00:04 - Aug 18 by DJack | BULLSHIT, even though it is against what I believe and even more importantly what Potter believes, if you pay a player (his agent) enough then he will play for you. |
Incorrect Slightly A bit of both Imho | | | |
Loan Players on 00:12 - Aug 18 with 2768 views | DJack |
Loan Players on 00:05 - Aug 18 by Fireboy2 | Incorrect Slightly A bit of both Imho |
So we can bring in players then. | |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
Loan Players on 11:01 - Aug 18 with 2552 views | Fireboy2 |
Loan Players on 00:12 - Aug 18 by DJack | So we can bring in players then. |
Yes we can bring loan players in But no matter what we offer them they must be right for potter and i suspect he will(hopefully)have his eye on a few Because we bloody need a few | | | |
Loan Players on 11:02 - Aug 18 with 2548 views | Loyal |
Loan Players on 23:50 - Aug 17 by sideline | doubt they watched the game,they still shaking they cocks at the tv watching roony. |
The pair of asset stripping fckrs were at the game. | |
| Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk. | Poll: | Who should be Swansea number 1 |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Loan Players on 11:05 - Aug 18 with 2517 views | awayjack | The yanks don’t have a clue about football and likely to depend on what failed keeper Jenkins tells them. They see dollar signs not players and I still don’t understand why some people still don’t get it. | | | |
Loan Players on 11:22 - Aug 18 with 2452 views | Badlands |
Loan Players on 00:12 - Aug 18 by DJack | So we can bring in players then. |
They have to want to come ... they don't. | |
| |
Loan Players on 12:20 - Aug 18 with 2304 views | awayjack |
Loan Players on 11:22 - Aug 18 by Badlands | They have to want to come ... they don't. |
Nonsense. Pay market rates and the right players will join. | | | |
Loan Players on 10:10 - Aug 19 with 1998 views | awayjack | Another couple of weeks with zero activity and more reports of players leaving on loan than coming in. Losing Routs, Naughton, Narsignh or maybe even Dyer with such a threadbare squad for a long hard season is another massive risk. It’s obvious we already need a quality DM, CF and back up in defence but if these four leave is it realistic we bring in 5-6 loan players in just over a week? | | | |
Loan Players on 10:13 - Aug 19 with 1979 views | dobjack2 |
Loan Players on 11:22 - Aug 18 by Badlands | They have to want to come ... they don't. |
Why don’t they want to come here then? The weather? | | | |
Loan Players on 10:17 - Aug 19 with 1957 views | thornabyswan |
Loan Players on 10:10 - Aug 19 by awayjack | Another couple of weeks with zero activity and more reports of players leaving on loan than coming in. Losing Routs, Naughton, Narsignh or maybe even Dyer with such a threadbare squad for a long hard season is another massive risk. It’s obvious we already need a quality DM, CF and back up in defence but if these four leave is it realistic we bring in 5-6 loan players in just over a week? |
It's obvious we need to shift more players out to bring players in. How much have we actually saved on the wage bill to date. Transfers out 47 million Transfers in 5.5 million. The wage savings must be substantial as well. No idea how much we lost last season though. | |
| |
Loan Players on 10:44 - Aug 19 with 1884 views | Al_Bundy | If we are not careful we'll be restructuring for L1 wages next season | | | |
Loan Players on 13:31 - Aug 19 with 1717 views | awayjack |
Loan Players on 10:17 - Aug 19 by thornabyswan | It's obvious we need to shift more players out to bring players in. How much have we actually saved on the wage bill to date. Transfers out 47 million Transfers in 5.5 million. The wage savings must be substantial as well. No idea how much we lost last season though. |
Yes it’s tough to work out cost base. Last accounts for 2017 show salaries of £99m and other operating costs of £27m. As comparison Burnley in 2017 wage costs of £61m and £11m on other costs, somehow £44m lower cost base than ours with similar income. The Trust must have more details but fag packet estimate would be we’ve cut player costs by around £50m. Logic is including bonuses / NIC: Loanees (Sanches, Tammy, King) - save £12m including high loan fees. Left / Retired (Rangel, Leon, Ki) - save £6m Sold / loan to date (11 players) - save £25m Next (Routs, Dyer, Nars, Naught) - save £7m So that would be 21 players out and 5 in! 5 young players in on relatively low wages so offset by relegation clauses of remaining players. There’s decent bonuses in 2017 costs (for staying up) and compensation for two managers sacked, so wages down to around £35m. I’ve no idea what the £27m other costs are as we don’t pay much for Stadium and seem completely out of sync with clubs of our size (eg Burnley £11m). | | | |
Loan Players on 13:49 - Aug 19 with 1636 views | Whiterockin | I’ve no idea what the £27m other costs are as we don’t pay much for Stadium and seem completely out of sync with clubs of our size (eg Burnley £11m). Did the team fly to away matches? | | | |
Loan Players on 14:35 - Aug 19 with 1511 views | awayjack |
Loan Players on 13:49 - Aug 19 by Whiterockin | I’ve no idea what the £27m other costs are as we don’t pay much for Stadium and seem completely out of sync with clubs of our size (eg Burnley £11m). Did the team fly to away matches? |
That would be a hell of a flight! More likely the first class travel of the Board and side-kicks. | | | |
| |