Forum | Stoke in bottom 3 by macclesfieldman |

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Stoke in bottom 3 17:52 - Oct 21 with 3854 views

macclesfieldman

ðŸ˜ŽðŸ˜ŽðŸ˜ŽðŸ˜ƒðŸ˜ŽðŸ˜ŽðŸ˜ŽðŸ˜ŽðŸ˜Ž

Wild horses couldn't drag me away...

Stoke in bottom 3 on 19:25 - Oct 21 with 3740 views

WestonsuperR

Love it! Will never forgive Hughes, a whole pre-season and almost a blank chequebook and he acehived one of the worst starts in Prem history.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 19:26 - Oct 21 with 3729 views

ShotKneesHoop

Stoke in bottom 3 on 19:25 - Oct 21 by WestonsuperR
Love it! Will never forgive Hughes, a whole pre-season and almost a blank chequebook and he acehived one of the worst starts in Prem history.

Still not as bad as redknobb.

Why does it feel like R'SWiPe is still on the books? Yer Couldn't Make It Up.Well Done Me!

Stoke in bottom 3 on 19:29 - Oct 21 with 3732 views

PunteR

HAHA..Brilliant.

That man deserves a relegation on his CV

Occasional providers of half decent House music.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 19:30 - Oct 21 with 3728 views

queensparker

Stoke, West Ham and Everton going down would be nice

Stoke in bottom 3 on 19:40 - Oct 21 with 3705 views

RangersDave

Meticulous! ðŸ˜

	WWW.northernphotography.com
Poll:	Do we think Rangers wil be mathematically relegated by or on New Years day?

Stoke in bottom 3 on 21:32 - Oct 21 with 3595 views

SimonJames

Stoke in bottom 3 on 19:30 - Oct 21 by queensparker
Stoke, West Ham and Everton going down would be nice

Not Palarse or the scum?

100% of people who drink water will die.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 22:15 - Oct 21 with 3533 views

dodge_stoke_r

Would be very happy for it to be just this way come May

Stoke in bottom 3 on 22:25 - Oct 21 with 3507 views

Toast_R

I know it's easy to suggest in hindsight but the worst decision the board made was to sack Hughes. They should have stuck with him till the very end that season, the VVanker should have been made to go down with the ship. To give him a payoff was criminal.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 04:42 - Oct 22 with 3391 views

bosh67

Stoke in bottom 3 on 22:25 - Oct 21 by Toast_R
I know it's easy to suggest in hindsight but the worst decision the board made was to sack Hughes. They should have stuck with him till the very end that season, the VVanker should have been made to go down with the ship. To give him a payoff was criminal.

Agreed. Stoke mate of mine really can't stand him. Main problem is that he plays one way and once players lose confidence in that, that really is it. On reflection though he took advantage of our very naive board. Spend a fortune on a totally new team, many of whom have never played in the UK and who can't speak much english. Buy others that are just coming for a truck full of money. This in response to narrowly avoiding relegation the season before and saying, this will never happen again.

Had he come out and said I really didn't get it right and I should have done a lot better, some would have forgiven him, but he never did and seemed to blame the club in the end.

	Never knowingly right.
Poll:	How long before new signings become quivering wrecks of the players they were?

Stoke in bottom 3 on 10:11 - Oct 22 with 3186 views

TGRRRSSS

Stoke in bottom 3 on 21:32 - Oct 21 by SimonJames
Not Palarse or the scum?

Any of those 5 would ne nice, but however much we dream it lets face it, can you honestly see Scum getting relegated in most of our lifetimes?

As for Hughesless, was interviewed in The Times Sports yesterday, quite a piece about him and how he's into the club and it's community what nots, it's fair to say when it focused on the football it was a huge amount of whitewashing going on of his past, in terms of ourselves it wasn't mentioned once.

I still don't think they will go down personally.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 10:17 - Oct 22 with 3179 views

TGRRRSSS

ON Wiki Hughes managerial record from first job to yesterdays result..

Team From To Record Ref
P W D L Win %
Wales 3 August 1999 13 October 2004 41 12 15 14 29.3 [177][178]
Blackburn Rovers 15 September 2004 4 June 2008 188 82 47 59 43.6 [179]
Manchester City 4 June 2008 19 December 2009 77 36 16 25 46.8 [52][179]
Fulham 29 July 2010 2 June 2011 43 14 16 13 32.6 [56][179]
Queens Park Rangers 10 January 2012 23 November 2012 34 8 6 20 23.5 [179]
Stoke City 30 May 2013 Present 186 68 45 73 36.6 [179]
Total 569 220 145 204 38.7

Stoke in bottom 3 on 16:21 - Oct 22 with 3037 views

daveB

Stoke in bottom 3 on 19:26 - Oct 21 by ShotKneesHoop
Still not as bad as redknobb.

caused the club far more long term problems than Redknapp did, will take years to recover from what Hughes did from getting rid of QPR men from the coaching side to the terrible signings and massive contracts handed out in what was our own great chance to establish ourselves in the prem

Stoke in bottom 3 on 16:30 - Oct 22 with 3032 views

Boston

Stoke in bottom 3 on 10:11 - Oct 22 by TGRRRSSS

When your only hope is to throw on a 35 year old beanpole substitute, you're going down.

Poll:

Thank God The Seaons Over.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 18:34 - Oct 22 with 2983 views

colinallcars

Out of the bottom three tonight.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 22:40 - Oct 22 with 2866 views

TW_R

Stoke in bottom 3 on 22:25 - Oct 21 by Toast_R
I know it's easy to suggest in hindsight but the worst decision the board made was to sack Hughes. They should have stuck with him till the very end that season, the VVanker should have been made to go down with the ship. To give him a payoff was criminal.

No - the worst decision the board made was employing him in the first place.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 09:56 - Oct 23 with 2712 views

qprphil

Please make a dream come true...............................

Stoke in bottom 3 on 10:32 - Oct 23 with 2678 views

Toast_R

Stoke in bottom 3 on 22:40 - Oct 22 by TW_R
No - the worst decision the board made was employing him in the first place.

Probably right there, but on paper it was a sound appointment, he'd done well at Fulham and Blackburn but no doubt had to tow the line with their respective boards. However, all that nonsense about him interviewing QPR and the club matching his ambition etc, Fernandes and Beard should have walked away there and then the absolute fools.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 10:36 - Oct 23 with 2669 views

WrightUp5hit___

Stoke in bottom 3 on 22:40 - Oct 22 by TW_R
No - the worst decision the board made was employing him in the first place.

No the boards error was allowing themselves to be interviewed by Hughless

Oooops, just a couple of minutes too slow there.

[Post edited 23 Oct 2017 11:38]

Stoke in bottom 3 on 10:57 - Oct 23 with 2649 views

Hooparoo

Stoke in bottom 3 on 10:36 - Oct 23 by WrightUp5hit___
No the boards error was allowing themselves to be interviewed by Hughless Oooops, just a couple of minutes too slow there. [Post edited 23 Oct 2017 11:38]

Surely the big warning bell was the disgusting arrogance he showed towards Fulham when he walked out. Tosser.

Poll:

Where will we finish up next season?

Stoke in bottom 3 on 11:00 - Oct 23 with 2642 views

paulparker

Stoke, Palace & west ham going down would make me cum oil for a fortnight

And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles Brian Moore

Stoke in bottom 3 on 13:19 - Oct 23 with 2562 views

toboboly

Stoke in bottom 3 on 11:00 - Oct 23 by paulparker
Stoke, Palace & west ham going down would make me cum oil for a fortnight

This. This. This. This. This.

Sexy Asian dwarves wanted.

Stoke in bottom 3 on 13:30 - Oct 23 with 2544 views

TW_R

Stoke in bottom 3 on 10:36 - Oct 23 by WrightUp5hit___
No the boards error was allowing themselves to be interviewed by Hughless Oooops, just a couple of minutes too slow there. [Post edited 23 Oct 2017 11:38]

Not at all. You interview the candidates based on your perception of their credentials. The error wasn't the interview - the error was the appointment.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread