By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
What business is it of the police if it's not a crime?
We all they are investigating non crime and if you are found not guilty of a non crime it goes on your record that you have been investigated and so appears on any disclosure and barring check done on you in the future.
Non Crime Hate Speech on 10:40 - Nov 16 by JACKMANANDBOY
We all they are investigating non crime and if you are found not guilty of a non crime it goes on your record that you have been investigated and so appears on any disclosure and barring check done on you in the future.
How can they investigate a non crime, or a non event, when there's nothing to investigate? You also can't be found not guilty of something that didn't occur. It's as if they are abusing any authority which they think they have. Police have no authority over anyone unless a law has been broken. This is one of the reasons that I don't have much time for them
0
Non Crime Hate Speech on 11:29 - Nov 16 with 350 views
Non Crime Hate Speech on 10:40 - Nov 16 by JACKMANANDBOY
We all they are investigating non crime and if you are found not guilty of a non crime it goes on your record that you have been investigated and so appears on any disclosure and barring check done on you in the future.
That is the disturbing thing: there is the possibility that the mere investigation of an alleged non-crime, even where no "hate speech" was found, can disadvantage the accused person in future.
Non Crime Hate Speech on 11:29 - Nov 16 by AnotherJohn
That is the disturbing thing: there is the possibility that the mere investigation of an alleged non-crime, even where no "hate speech" was found, can disadvantage the accused person in future.
The driver for the investigations is linked into guidance from issued by the College of Policing who are the Home Office’s proxy for all things policing. The original article states the “Government guidance says that NCHIs are only supposed to be recorded by police when they are “clearly motivated by intentional hostility” and could result in further escalation.” Which is sensible, but it’s clear objectivity is being lost in the real world.
0
Non Crime Hate Speech on 14:42 - Nov 16 with 289 views
Non Crime Hate Speech on 14:23 - Nov 16 by majorraglan
The driver for the investigations is linked into guidance from issued by the College of Policing who are the Home Office’s proxy for all things policing. The original article states the “Government guidance says that NCHIs are only supposed to be recorded by police when they are “clearly motivated by intentional hostility” and could result in further escalation.” Which is sensible, but it’s clear objectivity is being lost in the real world.
I think there is clear subjectivity here, particularly around the words ' could result in further escalation '. Imagine having your life chances affected by someone's subjectivity when you have not committed an offence.
Non Crime Hate Speech on 14:42 - Nov 16 by JACKMANANDBOY
I think there is clear subjectivity here, particularly around the words ' could result in further escalation '. Imagine having your life chances affected by someone's subjectivity when you have not committed an offence.
I agree with you. Police forces are being caught between a rock and a hard place, if they don’t record the incident they’ll get hammered by HMIC and get accused of “cuffing” with the inevitable accusations they’re potentially missing out on catching the next Wayne Cousens character and at the other end of the scale there’s the risk of potentially criminalising people.
0
Non Crime Hate Speech on 15:50 - Nov 16 with 271 views
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
