| Serious question. 14:19 - Oct 3 with 4268 views | Snipper |
Please forgive me if this question sounds very stupid.
I was listening to talksport earlier, and they was on about how best to play against Erling Haaland.
Simon Jordan said that Man Utd were just laying off him.
The thing with trying to stop Haaland is you then have to try to stop Kevin De Bruyne, Phil Foden and Jack Grealish etc…….
So here’s my question with my QPR hat on:
Would Danny Maddix, at his absolute best, have been able to play man to man on Haaland? |  | | |  |
| Serious question. on 01:26 - Oct 4 with 634 views | SonofNorfolt |
Haaland, Foden, Grealish, De Bruyne.
All four were/are at a different level.
Can't help admitting it they were a joy to watch. |  | | |
| Serious question. on 10:05 - Oct 4 with 537 views | essextaxiboy |
Cynical fouling , off the ball if req , take the bookings, use the 5 subs to rotate to avoid reds. You would get away with a few in the first half . |  | | |
| Serious question. on 11:20 - Oct 4 with 502 views | PinnerPaul |
| Serious question. on 10:05 - Oct 4 by essextaxiboy |
Cynical fouling , off the ball if req , take the bookings, use the 5 subs to rotate to avoid reds. You would get away with a few in the first half . |
You have to get near him first - can't imagine Mr Dickie ever being in the same parish for most of the 90'  |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.