Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 21:37 - Dec 8 with 7431 views | shimmie | As bizarre as it sounds that’s what I’ve heard, anyone else heard the same? | | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:39 - Dec 8 with 5395 views | exiledclaseboy | No, but it wouldn't surprise me. | |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:40 - Dec 8 with 5389 views | ItchySphincter | Heard it loads of times and everytime time I hear it it sounds like boIIocks. Put yourself in Monk's shoes, would you? I f*ckiing wouldn't and I doubt Rodgers would allow it either. Absolute buIIshit. | |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:40 - Dec 8 with 5366 views | SwansNZ |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:40 - Dec 8 by ItchySphincter | Heard it loads of times and everytime time I hear it it sounds like boIIocks. Put yourself in Monk's shoes, would you? I f*ckiing wouldn't and I doubt Rodgers would allow it either. Absolute buIIshit. |
Yeah. Lump on | |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:41 - Dec 8 with 5317 views | jojaca |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:39 - Dec 8 by exiledclaseboy | No, but it wouldn't surprise me. |
I just think Rodgers coming back is too good to be true. | |
| Even when you know, you never know? |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:42 - Dec 8 with 5279 views | shimmie |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:40 - Dec 8 by ItchySphincter | Heard it loads of times and everytime time I hear it it sounds like boIIocks. Put yourself in Monk's shoes, would you? I f*ckiing wouldn't and I doubt Rodgers would allow it either. Absolute buIIshit. |
Well I don't know. He keeps his job, he's not seen as a complete failure, Rodgers gets his chance to re-establish himself (and then move on if we do well) Huw keeps his boy (and can admit that maybe last season we got a bit lucky and that GMs appointment was a bit much to soon) and then GM takes the reigns again or moves on to a No1 spot elsewhere in time, saving us 3m in compo. Stranger things have happened. | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:42 - Dec 8 with 5278 views | oh_tommy_tommy | It's been doing the rounds , I really hope not . As Itchy days can't see them both agreeing . Clough n Taylor ! | |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:44 - Dec 8 with 5237 views | jojaca |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:42 - Dec 8 by oh_tommy_tommy | It's been doing the rounds , I really hope not . As Itchy days can't see them both agreeing . Clough n Taylor ! |
What about Colin? | |
| Even when you know, you never know? |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:44 - Dec 8 with 5229 views | ItchySphincter |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:40 - Dec 8 by SwansNZ | Yeah. Lump on |
Yeah, it's Swansea City after all. Stranger things have happened and Brendan did recently throw his guys under the bus. Bad idea though. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:47 - Dec 8 with 5159 views | Darran | I'd take Rodgers and Monk but I know someone that reckons Rodgers is going to China. | |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:48 - Dec 8 with 5125 views | NeathJack | Don't see this working at all. | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:49 - Dec 8 with 5096 views | builthjack |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:44 - Dec 8 by jojaca | What about Colin? |
He can do the water bottles | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:50 - Dec 8 with 5090 views | lifelong | Can't see it myself, huge gamble for Rodgers and complete loss of face for Monk who would be better off making the break and starting again at another club. | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:52 - Dec 8 with 5054 views | ItchySphincter |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:49 - Dec 8 by builthjack | He can do the water bottles |
F*cking hell, one step at a time mun. He hasn't graduated from holding the door open yet. [Post edited 8 Dec 2015 21:53]
| |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:55 - Dec 8 with 4983 views | monmouth | Solves nothing if Monk's really lost the dressing room. If not, and Monk can be kept on then why bring in someone else. Sack the backroom numpties and keep the monk. Save a wedge. There's nowt in it for Brodge either. I can't for the life of me see how 'saving' us would resurrect his career in any way. He needs to win something somewhere. It's bollocks. And therefore highly likely, in the parallel universe we have created. | |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:56 - Dec 8 with 4963 views | epaul |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:52 - Dec 8 by ItchySphincter | F*cking hell, one step at a time mun. He hasn't graduated from holding the door open yet. [Post edited 8 Dec 2015 21:53]
|
Im sure he knows where the kettle is | |
| The hair and the beard have gone I am now conforming to society, tis a sad day
The b*stards are coming back though |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:58 - Dec 8 with 4920 views | waynekerr55 |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:47 - Dec 8 by Darran | I'd take Rodgers and Monk but I know someone that reckons Rodgers is going to China. |
Shame Daz. | |
| |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:59 - Dec 8 with 4917 views | AngelRangelQS |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:50 - Dec 8 by lifelong | Can't see it myself, huge gamble for Rodgers and complete loss of face for Monk who would be better off making the break and starting again at another club. |
Why is it a gamble for Rodgers? | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:07 - Dec 8 with 4790 views | lifelong |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:59 - Dec 8 by AngelRangelQS | Why is it a gamble for Rodgers? |
If he failed it would further damage his reputation. | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:07 - Dec 8 with 4788 views | oldcob |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:59 - Dec 8 by AngelRangelQS | Why is it a gamble for Rodgers? |
I'd take that. At least GM would actually be earning his wage and learning. What happens to Pep if it happens, I wonder? | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:09 - Dec 8 with 4756 views | shimmie |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:07 - Dec 8 by oldcob | I'd take that. At least GM would actually be earning his wage and learning. What happens to Pep if it happens, I wonder? |
He'd get the spanish archer but it would probably cost us about 27 pence in compo as opposed to 3m. | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:09 - Dec 8 with 4748 views | swan65split | I cant see it being the outcome we are expecting! ATM it has a look of a Laurel and Hardy film about it!..... | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:16 - Dec 8 with 4670 views | AngelRangelQS |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:07 - Dec 8 by lifelong | If he failed it would further damage his reputation. |
Isn't that the same wherever he goes?!?!? | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:23 - Dec 8 with 4585 views | Jackofdreambeach |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:39 - Dec 8 by exiledclaseboy | No, but it wouldn't surprise me. |
Would solve a difficult connundrum. What a strong pairing. BR director of football ...genius | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:23 - Dec 8 with 4580 views | JJJack | Rodgers wouldn't fail. He'd keep us up unquestionably. But Monk staying as his No.2? No chance | | | |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 22:24 - Dec 8 with 4557 views | Brynmill_Jack |
Rodgers and Monk as his No.2 on 21:47 - Dec 8 by Darran | I'd take Rodgers and Monk but I know someone that reckons Rodgers is going to China. |
Vincent Tan? | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
| |