Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays 15:13 - Dec 7 with 35717 viewsPlazex

Actually looks as if Sakho took fabianski down. Hope we have the card rescinded. And bloody hell 3-1 crap.

Poll: Where will we finish?

1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:09 - Dec 7 with 1446 viewsskippyjack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:03 - Dec 7 by Parlay

No, the goalscoring opportunity was denied as soon as he impeded him.

His goalscoring opportunity became less of an opportunity DUE to the foul which is why it can be brought back and the red given.

He had a secondary opportunity which is there purely to keep the game at 11v11. There was in fact an exact parallel with Caulkers (i think) sending off for cardiff last year. He committed a professional foul, the ref played advantage and the striker missed, it was brought back and e red was given.

Correct then and was widely praised, by myself also. Same applies here.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 20:06]


A ref would normally give a yellow in that situation.. because I've seen it happen in other games.. the yellow is the correct call.. it's a debate I've read up about..

The awkward moment when a Welsh Club become the Champions of England.. shh The Swansea Way.. To upset the odds.
Poll: Best Swans Player

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:09 - Dec 7 with 1440 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:06 - Dec 7 by perchrockjack

Parlay.
That's some response.
Didn't read it all as I have a short attention sp.

Good posting .

No one poster is better than another


Thank you.

Dont be silly though, lisa is better than all of us because she thinks it wasnt a red.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-2
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:09 - Dec 7 with 1439 viewsBrynmill_Jack

Pssst Parlay

Each time I go to Bedd - au........................

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:10 - Dec 7 with 1427 viewsexiledclaseboy

I see Parlay's got his virtual hamster wheel out again and is keeping you all busy. Like fiddles.

Poll: Tory leader

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:12 - Dec 7 with 1398 viewsperchrockjack

They ve had a hot spring in oz

Poll: Who has left Wales and why

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:14 - Dec 7 with 1396 viewsBrynmill_Jack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:10 - Dec 7 by exiledclaseboy

I see Parlay's got his virtual hamster wheel out again and is keeping you all busy. Like fiddles.


Not me mate, wised up after DGT and yours truly got him so upset he made a thread all about us stalking him then talked to himself on it. Pitiful . But it's fair to say that DGT's the boy for him. I'm pleased to say I've had him on ignore ever since.

Each time I go to Bedd - au........................

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:17 - Dec 7 with 1381 viewswaynekerr55

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 15:32 - Dec 7 by lidojack

If common sense prevails they will be considered the same incident though.
If the ref gives the handball there's no red card.
If the striker doesn't handball it he doesn't get it around Fabianski and there's no goal scoring opportunity to deny and therefore no red card.


Apologies for not trawling the thread, but if we were to literally interpret the rules, then he'd get off. Sakho hit the post, therefore technically a goalscoring opportunity was not denied

How many of you know what DP stands for?
Poll: POTY 2019
Blog: Too many things for a title, but stop with the xenophobia accusations!

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:18 - Dec 7 with 1371 viewsDarran

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:17 - Dec 7 by waynekerr55

Apologies for not trawling the thread, but if we were to literally interpret the rules, then he'd get off. Sakho hit the post, therefore technically a goalscoring opportunity was not denied


Spot on Wayne.

The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll: Who’s got the most experts

0
Login to get fewer ads

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:20 - Dec 7 with 1370 viewsNeathJack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:17 - Dec 7 by waynekerr55

Apologies for not trawling the thread, but if we were to literally interpret the rules, then he'd get off. Sakho hit the post, therefore technically a goalscoring opportunity was not denied


The ref had already blown at that point so ironically the only person to actually deny Sakho a goalscoring opportunity was Foy.
0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:20 - Dec 7 with 1362 viewsJackfath

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:20 - Dec 7 by NeathJack

The ref had already blown at that point so ironically the only person to actually deny Sakho a goalscoring opportunity was Foy.


In that case he should have sent himself off.

POSTER OF THE YEAR 2013. PROUD RECIPIENT OF THE SECOND PLANET SWANS LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD.
Poll: Should Darran's ban be lifted?

1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:25 - Dec 7 with 1345 viewslondonlisa2001

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:09 - Dec 7 by Parlay

Thank you.

Dont be silly though, lisa is better than all of us because she thinks it wasnt a red.


You are either deliberately misconstruing what I have said or you are completely thick. Which is it?
0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:29 - Dec 7 with 1328 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:18 - Dec 7 by Darran

Spot on Wayne.


He is not spot on, because the goalscoring opportunity was being through on goal with no keeper that was denied by fabianski.

IF...

the ref used his discretion to wait for play to deveop then the resulant chance would be not in Sakhos favour but indeed the offending party. This "chance" is much harder directly caused by the foul which is why the ref can bring it back.

He denied the clear goalscoring opportunity that Sakho would have had if he hadnt have impeded him. Because he was left woth a harder one does not discount the former.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:30 - Dec 7 with 1320 viewsDarran

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:29 - Dec 7 by Parlay

He is not spot on, because the goalscoring opportunity was being through on goal with no keeper that was denied by fabianski.

IF...

the ref used his discretion to wait for play to deveop then the resulant chance would be not in Sakhos favour but indeed the offending party. This "chance" is much harder directly caused by the foul which is why the ref can bring it back.

He denied the clear goalscoring opportunity that Sakho would have had if he hadnt have impeded him. Because he was left woth a harder one does not discount the former.


He wasn't denied he had a shot and missed.

The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll: Who’s got the most experts

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:30 - Dec 7 with 1316 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:25 - Dec 7 by londonlisa2001

You are either deliberately misconstruing what I have said or you are completely thick. Which is it?


Im probably completely thick Lisa, ive already learned im a rubbish fan, you are better than me, football laws arent correct, i was rooting for Reading in the play offs against... Us and of course that i want Fabianski to be banned.

There is a lot ove learned about myself today.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:31 - Dec 7 with 1312 viewsC_jack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:30 - Dec 7 by Parlay

Im probably completely thick Lisa, ive already learned im a rubbish fan, you are better than me, football laws arent correct, i was rooting for Reading in the play offs against... Us and of course that i want Fabianski to be banned.

There is a lot ove learned about myself today.


How do you understand the process?

Poll: Who did you vote for today, in the general election?

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:32 - Dec 7 with 1305 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:30 - Dec 7 by Darran

He wasn't denied he had a shot and missed.


He was denied the shot he should have had. The one he was left with would have saved fabianski had it gone in, it didnt, so he was off (correctly) for denying the opportunity he would have had if the foul had not taken place.

But the ref didnt play advantage anyway so its a moot point.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 20:32]

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:33 - Dec 7 with 1298 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:31 - Dec 7 by C_jack

How do you understand the process?


How do you?

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:34 - Dec 7 with 1285 viewsjackonicko

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:29 - Dec 7 by Parlay

He is not spot on, because the goalscoring opportunity was being through on goal with no keeper that was denied by fabianski.

IF...

the ref used his discretion to wait for play to deveop then the resulant chance would be not in Sakhos favour but indeed the offending party. This "chance" is much harder directly caused by the foul which is why the ref can bring it back.

He denied the clear goalscoring opportunity that Sakho would have had if he hadnt have impeded him. Because he was left woth a harder one does not discount the former.


If you insist on being so literal on the rules, Parlay, then the words of Law 12 are very clear. The red card is for denying a clear goal scoring opportunity. There is no distinction between a clearer or better goal scoring opportunity. It's binary.

He had a clear opportunity. He therefore wasn't denied. Therefore, it is more than fair to argue not a red card.
0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:35 - Dec 7 with 1283 viewslondonlisa2001

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:30 - Dec 7 by Parlay

Im probably completely thick Lisa, ive already learned im a rubbish fan, you are better than me, football laws arent correct, i was rooting for Reading in the play offs against... Us and of course that i want Fabianski to be banned.

There is a lot ove learned about myself today.


That's good Parlay - that self awareness is the start of a journey of improvement.
0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:37 - Dec 7 with 1274 viewsC_jack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:33 - Dec 7 by Parlay

How do you?


marvellous stuff

Poll: Who did you vote for today, in the general election?

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:38 - Dec 7 with 1268 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:37 - Dec 7 by C_jack

marvellous stuff


Oh, thanks for the contribution.

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:38 - Dec 7 with 1263 viewsexiledclaseboy

I haven't read all of this thread by any means but isn't the relevant question whether the ref would have pulled play back and disallowed the goal had Sakho's shot gone in? If the answer is no, then it's clear that no goalscoring opportunity was denied and the red card should be rescinded. If Foy says yes (which he will and Sky's enhanced audio showing him blowing the whistle before Sakho's attempt on goal will support him in that) then there are no grounds for appeal. If we appeal, which I think we will, we'll lose.

The handball is irrelevant.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 20:41]

Poll: Tory leader

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:39 - Dec 7 with 1250 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:35 - Dec 7 by londonlisa2001

That's good Parlay - that self awareness is the start of a journey of improvement.


Oh cracker. You know that lowest form of wit saying don't you? You will be going down the well trodden mental health route next.

Funny you dont respond to my probing questions yet more than happy to give little playground one liners (remember i am supposed to be the childish and patronising one here) this is a bit like Dawn French calling Lenny Henry fat isnt it?

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

-1
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:41 - Dec 7 with 1234 viewsParlay

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:38 - Dec 7 by exiledclaseboy

I haven't read all of this thread by any means but isn't the relevant question whether the ref would have pulled play back and disallowed the goal had Sakho's shot gone in? If the answer is no, then it's clear that no goalscoring opportunity was denied and the red card should be rescinded. If Foy says yes (which he will and Sky's enhanced audio showing him blowing the whistle before Sakho's attempt on goal will support him in that) then there are no grounds for appeal. If we appeal, which I think we will, we'll lose.

The handball is irrelevant.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 20:41]


You awful fan you. Sense is banned around these here parts, its "save the polish 1" or nothing here.

I still dont think we will appeal regardless of what Monk has said, someone with sense will surely have a word in his shell like come tomorrow.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 20:42]

Forum celebrity
Poll: Is £45 a match ticket too high?

0
Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:43 - Dec 7 with 1221 viewsC_jack

Fabianski red card-Seen the replays on 20:38 - Dec 7 by exiledclaseboy

I haven't read all of this thread by any means but isn't the relevant question whether the ref would have pulled play back and disallowed the goal had Sakho's shot gone in? If the answer is no, then it's clear that no goalscoring opportunity was denied and the red card should be rescinded. If Foy says yes (which he will and Sky's enhanced audio showing him blowing the whistle before Sakho's attempt on goal will support him in that) then there are no grounds for appeal. If we appeal, which I think we will, we'll lose.

The handball is irrelevant.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 20:41]


If there's no handball then there's nothing, no goalscoring opportunity, just a big ol heap of Williams, Sakho and Fabianski.

The only part of his body that he can knock it past Fabianski with is his hand. He can't raise his foot that high and he's never putting his head down that low knowing what's coming.

It's the game's equivalent of entrapment, you can't foul to get another player to foul you.
[Post edited 7 Dec 2014 20:44]

Poll: Who did you vote for today, in the general election?

-1
Logo for 'BeGambleAware' Logo for 'BeGambleAware' Logo for 'GamStop' Gambling 18+
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024