By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Interesting stuff, makes you wonder what else might not be what it seems!.
"Stan work hard, could score goals in the air, and was complete team player. He headed balls off the line, and he had so much skill, balance, finesse and amazing touch. His mobility, that electrifying burst of 30 yards was exciting to watch"...Don Shanks.
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 19:33 - Dec 13 with 1851 views
Did we really land on the moon? on 18:18 - Dec 13 by klr
Conspiracy theorys; who remembers on the day of 7/7 watching BBC News & they mentioned reports of a shooting at Canary Wharf ? They mentioned it once & once only, then denied all knowledge of it.
Anyone on here seriously believe that a Commercial Airliner crashed in to the Pentagon ?
First time I've agreed with Klr but watched some footage last night and no don't believe a commercial airliner crashed into the pentagon. In any way shape of form and never have done. On that bloody awful day there was so many reports going round about various things going on that it was probably a false report of something happening at canary wharf to be honest
So what missile system are we talking about here?Tomahawk/ALCM had the right profile?Hellfire,Apache/drone launched from more of an angle....either one would have made a bigger mess.It was an airplane,get over it.
Did we really land on the moon? on 19:57 - Dec 13 by TheBlob
So what missile system are we talking about here?Tomahawk/ALCM had the right profile?Hellfire,Apache/drone launched from more of an angle....either one would have made a bigger mess.It was an airplane,get over it.
Must be easy to find some CCTV footage of a big old commercial airliner like that crashing in to the Pentagon at an impossible angle resulting in a fireball that left no traces of the massive commercial airliner whatsoever.
You would have to be a special kind of moron to think that a plane crashed in to The Pentagon, even the American government have erased the events at the pentagon on 9/11 from history, why ? because they made a complete pigs ear of it.
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 20:25 - Dec 13 with 1809 views
Did we really land on the moon? on 20:02 - Dec 13 by klr
Must be easy to find some CCTV footage of a big old commercial airliner like that crashing in to the Pentagon at an impossible angle resulting in a fireball that left no traces of the massive commercial airliner whatsoever.
You would have to be a special kind of moron to think that a plane crashed in to The Pentagon, even the American government have erased the events at the pentagon on 9/11 from history, why ? because they made a complete pigs ear of it.
Why spunk all that dough going to the moon anyway?
Billions upon Billions of years ago, something smashed into our Planet. A piece of Earth broke off and went spining into space. That piece of our Planet is the Moon as we know it today.
So why go there? What can you possible find that you can't find on Earth?
I'm wasting my time here.
What's going on? We should be told. Sort it out.
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 20:41 - Dec 13 with 1774 views
Did we really land on the moon? on 20:02 - Dec 13 by klr
Must be easy to find some CCTV footage of a big old commercial airliner like that crashing in to the Pentagon at an impossible angle resulting in a fireball that left no traces of the massive commercial airliner whatsoever.
You would have to be a special kind of moron to think that a plane crashed in to The Pentagon, even the American government have erased the events at the pentagon on 9/11 from history, why ? because they made a complete pigs ear of it.
Lol. So you find it easier to believe someone, no idea who, fired a military missile into the Pentagon, with absolutely no evidence, than the fact a plane was hijacked by 5 people on the same day 3 other planes were hijacked for the sole purpose of crashing into various buildings in the East USA. And you also find it easier to believe that flight AA77 either didn't exist or took off and landed safely with everyone on board. That means you also believe that the families of the victims that turned up at the memorial service at the Pentagon weren't really there or we're just actors and the victims names on the memorial were all fake. Oh, and the dozens of eye witnesses that saw a plane crash into the building were all actors too.
But, because nothing was clearly caught on CCTV (well known for being less than infallible) that it must have been a missile strike? Blimey!
It's good that Loose Change. I don't really believe any of it, but it's good.
I think conspiracy theories are a healthy thing in a lot of ways - brings out humanity's defiant, creative side. Far better than just going along with the flow like sheep.
That doesn't change the fact that many of them are bonkers.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 21:00 - Dec 13 with 1755 views
At the risk of joining the nutjob brigade, whilst the overwhelming majority of the 9/11 conspiracy theories are bollocks IMO, I can easily believe the part of the theory that Flight 93 was shot down and the 'overwhelming the hijackers' story was floated. Fighter jets were in the area at the time, had been given permission by then to shoot down unresponsive planes and several people claimed to have witnessed the plane being followed.
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 21:06 - Dec 13 with 1745 views
It certainly crashed in a fairly handy place considering all the metropolitan areas it was about to go over (no disrespect to the people on it). That part has always stuck in my mind.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 22:33 - Dec 13 with 1701 views
Did we really land on the moon? on 21:00 - Dec 13 by Jamie
At the risk of joining the nutjob brigade, whilst the overwhelming majority of the 9/11 conspiracy theories are bollocks IMO, I can easily believe the part of the theory that Flight 93 was shot down and the 'overwhelming the hijackers' story was floated. Fighter jets were in the area at the time, had been given permission by then to shoot down unresponsive planes and several people claimed to have witnessed the plane being followed.
Any president would be committing electoral suicide for shooting a plane down over home soil , so sorry to say I've always gone for the theory of the plane being shot down and parts of it being transported to the pentagon crash site , as a convincer for joe public . To grieve over .
If a plane crashes there is usually large pieces of the plane left usually engines being one of the biggest and heaviest part of the plane they usually survive the impact don't remember seeing anything like that left after the pentagon explosion
Did we really land on the moon? on 22:33 - Dec 13 by wombat
Any president would be committing electoral suicide for shooting a plane down over home soil , so sorry to say I've always gone for the theory of the plane being shot down and parts of it being transported to the pentagon crash site , as a convincer for joe public . To grieve over .
If a plane crashes there is usually large pieces of the plane left usually engines being one of the biggest and heaviest part of the plane they usually survive the impact don't remember seeing anything like that left after the pentagon explosion
If a plane crashes there is usually large pieces of the plane left usually engines being one of the biggest and heaviest part of the plane they usually survive the impact don't remember seeing anything like that left after the pentagon explosion
Agree and some expert has said that the wings would have broken off as the hole in the pentagon wasn't wide enough for them to go through
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 23:21 - Dec 13 with 1905 views
Did we really land on the moon? on 22:52 - Dec 13 by QPRDave
If a plane crashes there is usually large pieces of the plane left usually engines being one of the biggest and heaviest part of the plane they usually survive the impact don't remember seeing anything like that left after the pentagon explosion
Agree and some expert has said that the wings would have broken off as the hole in the pentagon wasn't wide enough for them to go through
I lost family in the 11th Sept attacks, had a cousin in one of the twin towers, so slightly emotive, but still the pentagon thing....no wings, no cars flipped over on the motorway, almost no debris when compared to other airliners that have come down, all CCTV footage taken from shops, petrol stations, hotels etc within minutes of it happening, the video I have seen shows something way smaller than a commercial liner flying too low, too fast, a (relatively) small puncture hole suggests something more like a bunker-buster than a commercial airliner. There is a great flash vid online somewhere I'll try to find and link tmrw.
The conspiracy for us here watching from afar is much more entertaining than simply just believing!
What channel was the moon landing prog on?
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 01:18 - Dec 14 with 1867 views
Did we really land on the moon? on 21:06 - Dec 13 by BklynRanger
It certainly crashed in a fairly handy place considering all the metropolitan areas it was about to go over (no disrespect to the people on it). That part has always stuck in my mind.
[Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
Brookers, hello mate, have you ever heard Rumsfield's quote about a plane being shot down that was attributed to confusion on his part? Stupid or not, you would not say something like that without knowledge of what went on.
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 03:45 - Dec 14 with 1849 views
No mate, don't know that I remember that comment. Will have a look.
I seriously think one way we could collectively take our minds off the football is to spend a night getting battered while watching a selected conspiracy theory film. Match thread included.
0
Did we really land on the moon? on 08:28 - Dec 14 with 1827 views
Did we really land on the moon? on 00:36 - Dec 14 by Pablo_Hoopsta
Looney or not, I love a conspiracy!
I lost family in the 11th Sept attacks, had a cousin in one of the twin towers, so slightly emotive, but still the pentagon thing....no wings, no cars flipped over on the motorway, almost no debris when compared to other airliners that have come down, all CCTV footage taken from shops, petrol stations, hotels etc within minutes of it happening, the video I have seen shows something way smaller than a commercial liner flying too low, too fast, a (relatively) small puncture hole suggests something more like a bunker-buster than a commercial airliner. There is a great flash vid online somewhere I'll try to find and link tmrw.
The conspiracy for us here watching from afar is much more entertaining than simply just believing!
Building 7 is an interesting one. It wasn't hit by a plane and came down demolition-style.
Also, they found the passports of the hijackers in the rubble. Yeah whatever.
The real shame of it all is that the volunteers who dug out the bodies and cleared the rubble got a big dump of lung cancer and the state doesn't support or acknowledge them.
Stefan Moore, Stefan Moore running down the wing. Stefan Moore, Stefan Moore running down the wing. He runs like a cheetah, his crosses couldn't be sweeter. Stefan Moore. Stefan Moore. Stefan Moore.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
