| Premiership Big spenders Summer 2012 14:36 - Sep 2 with 1480 views | daib0 |
Hi again,
All this of spending big or not this summer’s transfer window — there are worries and complaints on most premier forums to be honest. It depends what sort of figures one uses. If you take and add up EXPENDITURE for new players and simply DEDUCT money when you sell your players off I think that’s the most reliable way of doing it, as all clubs ALSO release players. Therefore, on the table below the highest spenders (after balancing incoming & outgoing) appear first, those who sell more than buy will be near the bottom then …
How does it come out? Well, very surprising for some!!:
Chelsea FC -90.948.000 £
Manchester United -47.163.600 £
Manchester City -35.112.000 £
Southampton FC -33.176.000 £
Liverpool FC -28.292.000 £
Aston Villa -19.562.400 £
Queens Park Rangers -16.794.800 £
West Ham United -15.967.600 £
Stoke City -14.291.200 £
Sunderland AFC -13.728.000 £
Norwich City -9.213.600 £
Reading FC -5.192.000 £
Newcastle United -3.489.200 £
West Bromwich Albion -2.200.000 £
Everton FC +748.000 £
Tottenham Hotspur +1.742.400 £
Wigan Athletic +2.257.200 £
Swansea City +5.693.600 £
Arsenal FC +11.484.000 £
Fulham FC +17.318.400 £
Thoughts, both on QPR and the others ? …
|  |
| Royals Rendezvous - a friendly Reading forum |
| |  |
| Premiership Big spenders Summer 2012 on 16:24 - Sep 2 with 1411 views | baz_qpr |
My thoughts are with the bottom side in 2013/14 due to get £70m I'm surprised some clubs have not spent more |  | | |
| Premiership Big spenders Summer 2012 on 17:57 - Sep 2 with 1362 views | QPR1882 |
We have off loaded 50% ( minimum ) of Bartons wages, + another 10 / 15 players wages. We have got most of our incoming players on loans ( therefore not picking up 100% of their wages ) or on frees and we still come out nearly £17m down.
I'm not having that. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
