Grant Hall 18:44 - Jan 6 with 4525 views | sdm1508 | Great to see him back. Such a good footballing centre back. Think he would make a good partnership with Leister. Hall is the footballing centre back that Lynch thinks he is. | | | | |
Grant Hall on 19:37 - Jan 6 with 3408 views | BlackCrowe | Composed, intelligent, talented. He was very very good today. | |
| |
Grant Hall on 19:39 - Jan 6 with 3394 views | FDC | Good to hear. I guess it's just match fitness he needs now? Listening to the comms it's obviously not easy to work out how individuals are playing. His name didn't come up often, other than hin being frustrated with himself for some misplaced passes late on. | | | |
Grant Hall on 19:44 - Jan 6 with 3375 views | WestbourneR | Think Lynch has more than earned his spot | |
| |
Grant Hall on 20:49 - Jan 6 with 3201 views | terryb | I thought he looked way of the pace in the first half. However, as the game progressed, so did his performance. It's really good to have him back & it gives us four centre backs before we have to resort to Baptiste. | | | |
Grant Hall on 20:53 - Jan 6 with 3166 views | VancouverHoop |
Grant Hall on 19:44 - Jan 6 by WestbourneR | Think Lynch has more than earned his spot |
I agree, but he and/or Cameron could well be down the road at the end of the year. Hall looks like a good, and necessary, replacement for either. | | | |
Grant Hall on 20:53 - Jan 6 with 3167 views | toboboly |
Grant Hall on 19:44 - Jan 6 by WestbourneR | Think Lynch has more than earned his spot |
Hall is twice the player even on one leg. | |
| Sexy Asian dwarves wanted. |
| |
Grant Hall on 20:54 - Jan 6 with 3159 views | Gloucs_R | Hall, lynch and Baptiste all out of contact in the summer. Who should get a new contract? | |
| |
Grant Hall on 20:54 - Jan 6 with 3159 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Grant Hall on 20:49 - Jan 6 by terryb | I thought he looked way of the pace in the first half. However, as the game progressed, so did his performance. It's really good to have him back & it gives us four centre backs before we have to resort to Baptiste. |
That's interesting, Terry, thanks. Only so much we can see on the stream. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Grant Hall on 20:55 - Jan 6 with 3153 views | Hunterhoop |
Grant Hall on 20:49 - Jan 6 by terryb | I thought he looked way of the pace in the first half. However, as the game progressed, so did his performance. It's really good to have him back & it gives us four centre backs before we have to resort to Baptiste. |
I would agree with this. Think a sharp quick forwRd would have run him ragged today. To be fair, he’s been out for a while. But no way am I having he was “very, very good”. Furlong was far superior and was the one leading the defence, making the calls, etc. Hall grew into it. Started way off the pace, but got better and finished strongly. Encouraging. Still behind BFG, Furlong, Lynch for centre back for me. And with his contract up, would I re-sign him? No, given his injury record, not unless it was half the money. We’ve paid him for two years not to play. That isn’t part of the model moving forwards. Can only take that punt if what we’re staking is lower. Ball will be in his court. | | | |
Grant Hall on 21:01 - Jan 6 with 3122 views | Watford_Ranger | Furlong is almost wasted at RB. Don’t think he’s all that going forwards and he looks so assured at CB. When Rangel is back I’d rather Lynch missed out. Perhaps harsh as he’s not done a lot wrong but Furlong is the future and arguably the present. Also think Kakay will be a player. Maybe needs to ease off the screaming at linesmen. | | | |
Grant Hall on 21:10 - Jan 6 with 3084 views | CiderwithRsie |
Grant Hall on 20:54 - Jan 6 by Gloucs_R | Hall, lynch and Baptiste all out of contact in the summer. Who should get a new contract? |
Looking at it a bit different: Hall or Cameron next year? | | | |
Grant Hall on 21:14 - Jan 6 with 3060 views | eastside_r |
Grant Hall on 20:49 - Jan 6 by terryb | I thought he looked way of the pace in the first half. However, as the game progressed, so did his performance. It's really good to have him back & it gives us four centre backs before we have to resort to Baptiste. |
Absolutely agree, he looked a little bit ring rusty but exudes class. I would love to see a sustained run of him and Leistner together at centre back. Beauty and the Beast! | | | |
Grant Hall on 23:49 - Jan 6 with 2773 views | VancouverHoop |
Grant Hall on 21:10 - Jan 6 by CiderwithRsie | Looking at it a bit different: Hall or Cameron next year? |
Both are out of contract. Depends on the money involved, I guess (and whether we have any.) Cameron's 33 and currently belongs to Stoke, Hall's five years younger and is ours. So Hall might be the easier argument to make. | | | |
Grant Hall on 23:59 - Jan 6 with 2739 views | PunteR | Isnt Halls injury one that he's stuck with for the rest of his career bit like ledley King? I don't think the club can afford to carry a player like that unfortunately. | |
| Occasional providers of half decent House music. |
| |
Grant Hall on 00:08 - Jan 7 with 2704 views | VancouverHoop |
Grant Hall on 23:59 - Jan 6 by PunteR | Isnt Halls injury one that he's stuck with for the rest of his career bit like ledley King? I don't think the club can afford to carry a player like that unfortunately. |
I don't rightly know. A cursory search shows he had a foot injury that kept him out when JFH was manager, then a hamstring followed by tendonitis in the knee under IH. I don't know which, if any, are connected. | | | |
Grant Hall on 00:24 - Jan 7 with 2675 views | wombat |
Grant Hall on 00:08 - Jan 7 by VancouverHoop | I don't rightly know. A cursory search shows he had a foot injury that kept him out when JFH was manager, then a hamstring followed by tendonitis in the knee under IH. I don't know which, if any, are connected. |
If I remeber rightly the knee bones connected to the thigh bone but Can’t remeber the rest of the song | |
| |
Grant Hall on 00:32 - Jan 7 with 2663 views | VancouverHoop |
Grant Hall on 00:24 - Jan 7 by wombat | If I remeber rightly the knee bones connected to the thigh bone but Can’t remeber the rest of the song |
I just knew that was coming! | | | |
Grant Hall on 00:56 - Jan 7 with 2637 views | Papillon | Hall, when fit is the most natural ball playing defender at the club. Showed some glimpses of that today and it was great to see. Just pray he can stay fit. Furlong at CB reminds of Paul Parker there back in the day. Does a great job at RB too, so that versatility is another bonus. Once Rangel is back and Hall stays fit it'll give McClaren a real headache, but the kind you want. Hall can player the Cameron role too - another plus. My only concern is the lack of cover at LB. When all are fit I too would like to see Hall given a go alongside BFG... [Post edited 7 Jan 2019 0:57]
| | | |
Grant Hall on 08:12 - Jan 7 with 2383 views | TheChef |
Grant Hall on 00:08 - Jan 7 by VancouverHoop | I don't rightly know. A cursory search shows he had a foot injury that kept him out when JFH was manager, then a hamstring followed by tendonitis in the knee under IH. I don't know which, if any, are connected. |
Pleased to see that he got a full 90 minutes under his belt yesterday - but if the tendinitis in his knee persists I don't know realistically how much football he can play consistently. Of course he's a professional footballer who should be getting the best possible medical treatment so maybe the situation won't be as bad in the long run as it might be for us mere mortals. | |
| |
Grant Hall on 08:23 - Jan 7 with 2354 views | Esox_Lucius |
Grant Hall on 23:59 - Jan 6 by PunteR | Isnt Halls injury one that he's stuck with for the rest of his career bit like ledley King? I don't think the club can afford to carry a player like that unfortunately. |
No, he had the knee operated on and the repair was successful (according to GH himself). He said he was looking forward to getting back into the side and keeping his place. | |
| The grass is always greener. |
| |
Grant Hall on 08:39 - Jan 7 with 2290 views | CiderwithRsie |
Grant Hall on 23:49 - Jan 6 by VancouverHoop | Both are out of contract. Depends on the money involved, I guess (and whether we have any.) Cameron's 33 and currently belongs to Stoke, Hall's five years younger and is ours. So Hall might be the easier argument to make. |
That's my thinking too. | | | |
Grant Hall on 08:41 - Jan 7 with 2288 views | YorkRanger |
Grant Hall on 23:59 - Jan 6 by PunteR | Isnt Halls injury one that he's stuck with for the rest of his career bit like ledley King? I don't think the club can afford to carry a player like that unfortunately. |
I think the advantage we have with Hall is that (sadly for him) his injury record will probably not make him hugely attractive to other clubs. On the right sort of pay structure to reflect his recent injury history I think his will be a contract worth renewing. | | | |
Grant Hall on 09:15 - Jan 7 with 2228 views | RblockPrior | For me Hall has a lot to do to replace Lynch who I think has struck up a great partnership with BFG, with Hall I feel his confidence is pretty low which I assume can only be down to not playing much and being injured for so long | |
| |
Grant Hall on 11:21 - Jan 7 with 2063 views | PunteR |
Grant Hall on 08:41 - Jan 7 by YorkRanger | I think the advantage we have with Hall is that (sadly for him) his injury record will probably not make him hugely attractive to other clubs. On the right sort of pay structure to reflect his recent injury history I think his will be a contract worth renewing. |
I dunno mate, the fact he wont be attractive to other clubs because of his injury record would be a concern. Thats the clue there. His injury record is pretty bad. As Esox tells me though he's had an op now which should sort it so maybe a years contract on a lower wage is an option. I definitely cant see a reason to drop Lynch for him. Lynch has been ok this season and popped up with a couple of goals. | |
| Occasional providers of half decent House music. |
| |
Grant Hall on 11:25 - Jan 7 with 2048 views | YorkRanger |
Grant Hall on 11:21 - Jan 7 by PunteR | I dunno mate, the fact he wont be attractive to other clubs because of his injury record would be a concern. Thats the clue there. His injury record is pretty bad. As Esox tells me though he's had an op now which should sort it so maybe a years contract on a lower wage is an option. I definitely cant see a reason to drop Lynch for him. Lynch has been ok this season and popped up with a couple of goals. |
I do agree that Lynch's place should not be subject to challenge as things stand. | | | |
| |