Antti Heinola returns with his post-match talking points column as QPR get the new campaign underway with a poor 2-0 loss at Charlton.
A midfielder who can run. A midfielder that gets back *and* goes forward. A midfielder that tackles without flying in and almost maiming someone. A midfielder that seems to have a level head. A midfielder with some pace. All brilliant. And most impressive of all was his passing. Absolutely excellent. Great awareness, positional sense, and always available for the ball. I'm not saying he's the finished article, or the messiah, or even a naughty boy but I am saying we have been crying out for a midfielder like this for years. Brilliant.
ACL prediction: November.
Yesterday he wasn't fit. Even a halfwit should have known that from before kick-off considering he has had various knocks that have limited him to just one pre-season game, at Barnet. His performance was hardly surprising. He started very well I thought - showing for the ball, laying it off nicely and went close with a good effort (and was miles away with an ambitious volley). He also laid the ball through for Chery in what was our best chance of the half, if not the game. But he visibly tired. And the fans started moaning. And groaning. And yelling at him to chase every completely hopeless lost cause and getting annoyed when he didn't. That's a real pet peeve of mine - exhausting yourself chasing every single lost cause, every single pass back, may keep the fans happy, but it's stupid and irresponsible because maybe, when you really need that burst of speed, it may not be there because the jets have run out of fuel.
QPR fans have history of this, of course. Sir Les may be a club legend, but every single week back then there were a group who enjoyed barracking him for being lazy, or precious, or for (in their eyes) wanting a big move. It happens with many of the good players we get, in fact. When Austin got booed yesterday, I was ashamed by our fans. I'm not sure how else to say it: He. Wasn't. Fully. Fit. Fans, though, like to project their stupid prejudices onto what they see so a man who has done nothing but good for the club and has acted professionally about all the speculation of a transfer, was booed for one poor performance, accused of faking an injury and even criticised for the way he waved to the crowd after the game. I don't get it.
I really liked the look of the team before kick-off. Balanced, and, despite real fears by many, actually very experienced. I think only Luongo hadn't played at Championship level before. And for 20-25 minutes you could really see (as Neil has outlined, so I won't go on about this) what Ramsey has been working on. Good passing, midfield collecting the ball from defence, stretching the opposition with the two wide players staying really wide, and probing for an opening. We had about ten corners and at one stage Charlton were clinging on - booting it away and waiting for the next wave of attacks. But, we didn't quite have the guile or the directness to force a really good opening. Charlton did really well to come back into it and threaten, I thought, and ended the stronger of the two sides as we took a breath. Fine.
Second half, we should have had the lead after Mackie made a good chance for Phillips (a combination reversed later where Mackie was unlucky to see his shot deflected over - another sign that the new formation has promise and will hopefully see us getting more men in the box on a regular basis this season). But we struggled a bit after that. Henry was off the pace, Phillips faded and Austin was leggy. It was a poor first goal to concede (see below), as was the second.
Ramsey was a little unlucky in that we conceded the second goal moments after he made his first changes. They could have come earlier, perhaps, maybe by a few minutes, but that's it. Charlton may have had good possession, but they weren't particularly threatening. Austin, I think, should have come off after about an hour when he was clearly struggling. But I like to look at things from both sides. At 1-0 down I can see why he left him on: if Charlie does get a chance, he'll probably bury it, half-fit or not. But in retrospect, he should have had the hook earlier - but that's not Austin's fault, so booing him was more than unfair.
Should Ramsey have started Austin? Debatable. He needs minutes, so I can see why he started him, but you could argue bringing him on with 20 or 30 left might have been more effective. Overall, while it was a disappointing result and a disappointing second half performance, I was encouraged by much that I saw (Luongo, Chery, Mackie, Chief, the style of play he's trying to implement). Much too early to start dismissing Ramsey as a coach - in every single game you lose we can find reasons to criticise the coach.
One thing though: Ramsey does need a win, and quickly. If we don't win before the international break, it's obvious fans are going to lose patience very quickly. Hope he gets it and gets some proper time to develop what is really a brand new squad.
Pictures — Action Images