| Sam Field or no Sam Field? 14:01 - Dec 8 with 6701 views | QPR_Pro_Max |
Though young and inexperienced, Varane and Morgan were making a big difference by more willing to carry the ball forward and making forward passes. While Field will 90% making backward passes or sideway passes if he is on the pitch. With such a negative style of play, it will definitely slow down the team’s overall movement and bring pressure to the defence or even creates chaos in our own half by inviting opponents immediate attack.
This passive mindset was one of the major reasons for the team’s low confidence to move forward and lack of attacking threat (toothless) for the last few months.
Varane and Morgan are the better midfielder combination for our success and very good saleable asset prospects by giving them more playing time.
Field is a good defensive player when we need to see out a game. |  | | |  |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 12:43 - Dec 9 with 2211 views | BAWHoops |
I thought Varane suffered for not having Field alongside him Saturday. Felt the game passed Morgan by and when we pressed high up it left Varane with tons of space to cover.
Thought Norwich got runners off him loads in the first half (much better second half).
Morgan has great potential, but realistically it needs to be Field and Varane in there at the base |  |
| http://blogandwhitehoops.wordpress.com/ |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 18:57 - Dec 11 with 1969 views | DTIG |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 10:14 - Dec 9 by terryb |
Wasn't Madsen limping from the kick he received? I think there's a good chance Field will replace him in the side with Morgan being moved forward. |
Anything to get Madsen out of the starting 11. He literally offers nothing. Doesn't tackle, doesn't win headers, doesn't track back...generally hides. Yes, given 20 yards of room he can spray a pass 30 yards out to the wings...but so can I at 58 years old! |  | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:13 - Dec 11 with 1839 views | eghamranger |
Definitely Sam Field |  | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:44 - Dec 11 with 1805 views | Hunterhoop |
Drink it in. |  | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:47 - Dec 11 with 1782 views | Leaftree |
This aged like milk | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:51 - Dec 11 with 1724 views | robith |
Ye of little faith |  | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:52 - Dec 11 with 1717 views | Tonto |
I would go with Sam Field. Gut feeling. |  |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:54 - Dec 11 with 1693 views | SimonJames |
 |  |
| 100% of people who drink water will die. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:58 - Dec 11 with 1628 views | Lblock |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 22:22 - Dec 8 by Lblock |
Sam Field one of the first names on team sheet for me.
I’d like to see him get more goals but that’s not his core role |
Yeah…… about those goals needed
Take
A
Bow
Sir |  |
| Cherish and enjoy life.... this ain't no dress rehearsal |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 21:59 - Dec 11 with 1613 views | Benny_the_Ball |
No need to start a survey. |  | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 22:04 - Dec 11 with 1544 views | BrianMcCarthy |
We all knew what QPR-Pro-Max was saying.
And I can see why the question was asked. It's been discussed on here a million times.
No harm, Pro-Max. |  |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 22:23 - Dec 11 with 1428 views | LazyFan |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 09:25 - Dec 9 by LazyFan |
When Varane was rested, Morgan was just okay. I think Morgan's playing well wasn't because Varane was so good; it was more because Norwich was so off the pace. This is not to say Morgan is not valuable; he certainly is and is one for the squad now, not the future. He's already proven himself, in my view.
It should be Field and Varane, as this allows everyone ahead of them to stay ahead of them. This is important as Madsen cannot get up and down the field quickly enough.
Also, Field is entirely fresh, and we can now see the partnership with Varane devolpe. Not to mention, Field is useful for defending corners and getting back for those crucial tackles on the left side.
This also means Saito can stay forward a bit more, as Ashby is coming in for Paal, and he will need cover.
I doubt we shall see Frey on the bench, but it seems there is a chance Chair may be there, or it's still too early for him. Either way, we shall see what it means for Frey if Chair is present or not.
Oxford will be a grind game, we shall need Field for that. They will press us and charge into us, they won't let a kid like Morgan play. I fear Charity Park Rangers turning up again.
It's clear we need a LB and CF in Jan on loans as these are our weak areas in the squad. I would be greedy and want a creative midfielder as well. But we won't get that, as three loans would be way too much money. |
As predicted :P |  |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 22:46 - Dec 11 with 1308 views | qpr_1968 |
sam field.....full stop. | |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 08:46 - Dec 12 with 1073 views | gazza1 |
Well done Sam Field, how any supporter/poster thinks Field is a 'non starter' is sheer naivety. He is the most solid DCM in the Club and a big asset to the Team & he showed that last night. Took his goals very well indeed. | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 09:48 - Dec 12 with 951 views | QPR_Jim |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 08:46 - Dec 12 by gazza1 |
Well done Sam Field, how any supporter/poster thinks Field is a 'non starter' is sheer naivety. He is the most solid DCM in the Club and a big asset to the Team & he showed that last night. Took his goals very well indeed. |
I was going to say that he reads danger really well, showed that against Watford with some great interceptions. But he also showed last night that when the opposition is weaker and we're on the front foot he can be an asset in attack as well. |  | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 10:07 - Dec 12 with 885 views | golborne |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 08:46 - Dec 12 by gazza1 |
Well done Sam Field, how any supporter/poster thinks Field is a 'non starter' is sheer naivety. He is the most solid DCM in the Club and a big asset to the Team & he showed that last night. Took his goals very well indeed. |
He is playing a different role currently. A role all previous managers have tried and ultimately switched back for whatever reason.
He is playing the more attacking of the two, due mostly because of his basic control of a football. He can’t be trusted to play in the deep role, as that requires a player to be able to collect and move the ball forward quickly. When he’s there the ball often goes straight back and not always in a precise way.
Last night in the first half the game passed him by in that role. Verane seemed to be playing both roles. Half time comes, Marty has a word and Field pushes further forward to where he’s supposed to be and he ends up playing a huge role in turning the game, goals aside. Was doing similar in the first half vs Watford and was the driver in the great play that lead to the Madsons chance. Verane is now the first on the team sheet in midfield, playing the deeper role. Field just needs to be consistent in the role he’s now being asked to play and he’ll start most games. I can’t watch the giraffe trying to trap a balloon situations we too often see in precarious situations that don’t allow for error. At best we end up with a pass going straight back where it came from. His control is better in stride. | | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 13:06 - Dec 12 with 717 views | CLAREMAN1995 |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 10:07 - Dec 12 by golborne |
He is playing a different role currently. A role all previous managers have tried and ultimately switched back for whatever reason.
He is playing the more attacking of the two, due mostly because of his basic control of a football. He can’t be trusted to play in the deep role, as that requires a player to be able to collect and move the ball forward quickly. When he’s there the ball often goes straight back and not always in a precise way.
Last night in the first half the game passed him by in that role. Verane seemed to be playing both roles. Half time comes, Marty has a word and Field pushes further forward to where he’s supposed to be and he ends up playing a huge role in turning the game, goals aside. Was doing similar in the first half vs Watford and was the driver in the great play that lead to the Madsons chance. Verane is now the first on the team sheet in midfield, playing the deeper role. Field just needs to be consistent in the role he’s now being asked to play and he’ll start most games. I can’t watch the giraffe trying to trap a balloon situations we too often see in precarious situations that don’t allow for error. At best we end up with a pass going straight back where it came from. His control is better in stride. |
Clive has been talking about this for a year or so I think saying Field should be scoring way more even close to double digits so maybe its finally happening.
Normally his second goal would have ended up outside in the road but he slammed it low into the corner like a seasoned striker.
His misses have cost us so far but if he keeps scoring a goal every few games it would be massive for us .His heart and passion is undeniable its easy to see why every QPR manager loves him. |  | | |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 13:34 - Dec 12 with 643 views | TheChef |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 13:06 - Dec 12 by CLAREMAN1995 |
Clive has been talking about this for a year or so I think saying Field should be scoring way more even close to double digits so maybe its finally happening.
Normally his second goal would have ended up outside in the road but he slammed it low into the corner like a seasoned striker.
His misses have cost us so far but if he keeps scoring a goal every few games it would be massive for us .His heart and passion is undeniable its easy to see why every QPR manager loves him. |
Have to say I don't recall him missing many? |  |
| |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 13:42 - Dec 12 with 587 views | QuillPenRiot |
| Sam Field or no Sam Field? on 10:07 - Dec 12 by golborne |
He is playing a different role currently. A role all previous managers have tried and ultimately switched back for whatever reason.
He is playing the more attacking of the two, due mostly because of his basic control of a football. He can’t be trusted to play in the deep role, as that requires a player to be able to collect and move the ball forward quickly. When he’s there the ball often goes straight back and not always in a precise way.
Last night in the first half the game passed him by in that role. Verane seemed to be playing both roles. Half time comes, Marty has a word and Field pushes further forward to where he’s supposed to be and he ends up playing a huge role in turning the game, goals aside. Was doing similar in the first half vs Watford and was the driver in the great play that lead to the Madsons chance. Verane is now the first on the team sheet in midfield, playing the deeper role. Field just needs to be consistent in the role he’s now being asked to play and he’ll start most games. I can’t watch the giraffe trying to trap a balloon situations we too often see in precarious situations that don’t allow for error. At best we end up with a pass going straight back where it came from. His control is better in stride. |
Nice analysis, very much agree with this! Field needs to be that 8 if we’re to have an effective midfield that links forward. Madsen did better too because of it, who seems to be positionallymopportunistic instead of a driver of playmaking (or press, though he’s gradually improving there). Varane does have that dribbling ability to push forward from back, good call on that, and Field’s sense of defense allows him to cover or assist the drive as needed |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
