| AGM Tuesday. 20:55 - Dec 7 with 6205 views | turnthescrew |
Will this now be cancelled due to the rearranged match with Leamington? |  | | |  |
| AGM Tuesday. on 17:35 - Dec 10 with 2477 views | D_Alien |
| AGM Tuesday. on 16:58 - Dec 10 by turnthescrew |
As long as the GS is held by a properly constituted and authorised group, separate from the business of RAFC, it can be called whatever you want it to be.
The overriding point is that the Trust, as is, has been neutered by the changed that occurred prior to the Ogden acquisition.
Its' effectiveness and intended function is finished in the way that it was originally meant to be. The recent Trust AGM was attended by about 20 people. That says it all. |
Erm, yes... we know all that, why repeat it?
The GS is actually more important, and central to the Ogden takeover, which is why i raised it in the first place. I also raise the question of whether the GS can ONLY be made available to the Trust as currently constituted. If anyone can update on that, i'm sure we'd all be grateful |  |
| |
| AGM Tuesday. on 18:38 - Dec 10 with 2299 views | James1980 |
The way I see it a trust is a fans union, as many fans has possible need to join it, for it to have enough teeth. | |
| |
| AGM Tuesday. on 19:42 - Dec 10 with 2173 views | turnthescrew |
| AGM Tuesday. on 17:35 - Dec 10 by D_Alien |
Erm, yes... we know all that, why repeat it?
The GS is actually more important, and central to the Ogden takeover, which is why i raised it in the first place. I also raise the question of whether the GS can ONLY be made available to the Trust as currently constituted. If anyone can update on that, i'm sure we'd all be grateful |
We all know what? 20 people at the AGM means not a lot of people may know anything of importance.
Instead of playing the role of a sarcastic tw@t, try and contribute something constructive. | | | |
| AGM Tuesday. on 19:52 - Dec 10 with 2157 views | judd |
Great to get a response, however indirectly received, although I did have the question count at 3. |  |
| |
| AGM Tuesday. on 20:00 - Dec 10 with 2106 views | 442Dale |
| AGM Tuesday. on 19:52 - Dec 10 by judd |
Great to get a response, however indirectly received, although I did have the question count at 3. |
Presumably the “full reply” will address all the questions. |  |
| |
| AGM Tuesday. on 20:09 - Dec 10 with 2077 views | judd |
| AGM Tuesday. on 20:00 - Dec 10 by 442Dale |
Presumably the “full reply” will address all the questions. |
Quote: "The Trust has received a question..." | |
| |
| AGM Tuesday. on 20:26 - Dec 10 with 1992 views | 442Dale |
| AGM Tuesday. on 20:09 - Dec 10 by judd |
Quote: "The Trust has received a question..." |
Previously on this subject…
——
This was raised at the Trust AGM last weekend, and reported as follows:
https://www.daletrust.co.uk/2024/11/trust-2024-agm/
“ Reference was made to the statement made by the Club regarding the new format of future AGMs, without the opportunity of a forum taking place once AGM business is concluded. A date for a Fans Forum will closely follow the AGM to allow participation to include all fans, and not limited to shareholders.”
Except it was specifically asked whether the decision to change the AGM format was challenged when the Trust had their meeting with the club.
——
That last point remains unanswered. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| AGM Tuesday. on 20:34 - Dec 10 with 1964 views | D_Alien |
| AGM Tuesday. on 19:42 - Dec 10 by turnthescrew |
We all know what? 20 people at the AGM means not a lot of people may know anything of importance.
Instead of playing the role of a sarcastic tw@t, try and contribute something constructive. |
That's precisely what i'm looking to do
Having someone continually counter with the bleeding obvious doesn't help one bit | |
| |
| AGM Tuesday. on 08:21 - Dec 11 with 1736 views | TalkingSutty |
| AGM Tuesday. on 22:04 - Dec 9 by judd |
Email sent to Trust tonight:
Hello All
Please can the club board be contacted and an explanation sought and made public as to why the AGM now set for 10 am on Monday 30th December is at such an inconvenient time for many shareholders ?
Also, why the established precedent of a separate Q&A after the AGM has been withdrawn from shareholders?
Could you also advise if the original time of 530 pm for tomorrow was challenged by the Trust, and what the outcome of this challenge was?
Very much look forward to hearing back from you with a full response |
I've sent a email to the Trust in relation to the ridiculous 10am start, it's obviously designed to deter attendance rather than encourage it. I can't believe the Ogden family are supportive of that. To be honest I've all but given up on the Supporters Trust and sending the email was against my better judgement. The worst thing to happen has been Murray Knight going into the Boardroom, this has in fact weakened the Trust rather than strengthened it. A total disaster i think. The Trust has been reduced to a timid weak kitten and is neither use nor ornament as it stands. They have no voice whatsoever and the whole set up needs disbanding and setting up again in a different supporters format. One that is stronger and fit for purpose, one that is aligned with how the Ogden family see the club going forward in the future. |  | | |
| AGM Tuesday. on 14:23 - Dec 11 with 1360 views | Rodingdale |
Indeed, an excellent communication. It may have been useful for the club to have foreseen concern and to have provided at the time the date was rearranged.
A question arising though, Chairman? Or Chairmen? SG and CO listed as Directors, who actually chairs the Board (meetings)? | | | |
| AGM Tuesday. on 09:00 - Dec 12 with 950 views | judd |
| AGM Tuesday. on 20:26 - Dec 10 by 442Dale |
Previously on this subject…
——
This was raised at the Trust AGM last weekend, and reported as follows:
https://www.daletrust.co.uk/2024/11/trust-2024-agm/
“ Reference was made to the statement made by the Club regarding the new format of future AGMs, without the opportunity of a forum taking place once AGM business is concluded. A date for a Fans Forum will closely follow the AGM to allow participation to include all fans, and not limited to shareholders.”
Except it was specifically asked whether the decision to change the AGM format was challenged when the Trust had their meeting with the club.
——
That last point remains unanswered. |
As expected, it was not a full response from the Trust (not the club, I might add).
The third question remains unanswered, as it did when you asked.
Further, it appears there was only action taken after the receipt of my email, so it can be assumed that the answer is no in both cases. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
