| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep 21:25 - Jul 8 with 14635 views | Darran |
I notice on that other site the village idiot is on about you knowing Dave Dulin and having a conflict of interest with Wonky Sheep.
What's that all about then? |  |
| |  |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:05 - Jul 9 with 2525 views | Darran |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 21:57 - Jul 9 by Sweyns_Eye |
Do you still send each other Christmas cards? |
Never have.
Look seriously it's a football forum to me and nothing else,if people want to assume things there's nothing I can do about that. | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:09 - Jul 9 with 2523 views | morningstar |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 21:42 - Jul 9 by Darran |
Laugh as much as you like BowBoy but I've hardly spoken to Sumbler since I got dumped as a mod,I don't need to anymore. |
Oh Sharrup Da is it! You started this thread so rejoice, and join in the fun!  |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:11 - Jul 9 with 2515 views | Darran |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:09 - Jul 9 by morningstar |
Oh Sharrup Da is it! You started this thread so rejoice, and join in the fun! |
Fun? | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:24 - Jul 9 with 2470 views | cwrw |
Well I'm having fun I haven't laughed at such a car crash of a thread in a long time. |  | | |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:25 - Jul 9 with 2467 views | morningstar |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:11 - Jul 9 by Darran |
Fun? |
Umm, yes. As I said, you started the thread and have been posting smilies, lols and rofls all over it? Are you ok tonite lad? | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 23:55 - Jul 9 with 2338 views | Chief |
This whole thing stinks.no matter how many away tickets we sold last year is irrelevant.This sounds like guaranteed tickets to highest bidder.A rich mans Jack army membership if you will.This 'agreement' they talk of with the club also stinks. What's to stop any one of us gathering up a conglomerate of Jack army members&going to the club to get 'an agreement'. We'll just outbid Wonky Sheep. Now the club wouldn't turn that down? Unless there's a vested interest? |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 19:36 - Jul 10 with 2120 views | Darran |
They're f*cking mentally ill on that other site,f*ck my eyes,contact the BBC,breaking the law,their own Legal Bot,seriously worrying.
The funniest thing I've read on the Internet in the last few years.
 | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 19:40 - Jul 10 with 2115 views | monmouth |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 19:36 - Jul 10 by Darran |
They're f*cking mentally ill on that other site,f*ck my eyes,contact the BBC,breaking the law,their own Legal Bot,seriously worrying.
The funniest thing I've read on the Internet in the last few years.
|
Legal Bot??
That'll be Shakyer Bot presumably? His expertise is legion. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 19:44 - Jul 10 with 2108 views | Darran |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 19:40 - Jul 10 by monmouth |
Legal Bot??
That'll be Shakyer Bot presumably? His expertise is legion. |
They're insane they're on about a judge now.
| |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 20:00 - Jul 10 with 2083 views | Jackfath |
 |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:21 - Jul 10 with 1986 views | Darran |
Fair play they've just hit an all time low. | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:32 - Jul 10 with 1953 views | NeathJack |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:21 - Jul 10 by Darran |
Fair play they've just hit an all time low. |
Utterly, utterly hideous. |  | | |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:34 - Jul 10 with 1948 views | Darran |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 22:32 - Jul 10 by NeathJack |
Utterly, utterly hideous. |
Well it is from someone that's had at least 3 usernames banned from here for being utter scum so it doesn't come as a surprise. | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 23:14 - Jul 10 with 1886 views | Uxbridge |
They're all class. Nice to see old Shakes has found a new calling though! |  |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 11:12 - Jul 11 with 1771 views | jackonicko |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 23:14 - Jul 10 by Uxbridge |
They're all class. Nice to see old Shakes has found a new calling though! |
New calling? Surely just a poor reprise of SOTB.
I'm struggling to get worked up over WS, and don't understand the 10 page witchunt. WS seem a bit amateurish, sure, but am I missing something? |  | | |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:25 - Jul 11 with 1695 views | cwrw |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 11:12 - Jul 11 by jackonicko |
New calling? Surely just a poor reprise of SOTB.
I'm struggling to get worked up over WS, and don't understand the 10 page witchunt. WS seem a bit amateurish, sure, but am I missing something? |
On a different thread there Wonky Sheep demanded that posts were either deleted or edited or else they would be taking the matter up with their solicitors and taking action against the forum. Wonky Sheep created that thread in response to the criticsm on other threads. From what I see on there the forum members have come out all guns blazing in response and the Wonky sheep can't or won't give straight answers. Just imagine the outrage on here if someone threatened Planet Swans with solicitors it would be a 20 pager | | | |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:32 - Jul 11 with 1687 views | Uxbridge |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 11:12 - Jul 11 by jackonicko |
New calling? Surely just a poor reprise of SOTB.
I'm struggling to get worked up over WS, and don't understand the 10 page witchunt. WS seem a bit amateurish, sure, but am I missing something? |
Not a lot. It seems they're the equivalent of paying some bloke to be in the queue for you. | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:45 - Jul 11 with 1673 views | Darran |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:25 - Jul 11 by cwrw |
On a different thread there Wonky Sheep demanded that posts were either deleted or edited or else they would be taking the matter up with their solicitors and taking action against the forum. Wonky Sheep created that thread in response to the criticsm on other threads. From what I see on there the forum members have come out all guns blazing in response and the Wonky sheep can't or won't give straight answers. Just imagine the outrage on here if someone threatened Planet Swans with solicitors it would be a 20 pager |
There's only about five people posting in the thread Bov. | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:48 - Jul 11 with 1670 views | jackonicko |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:25 - Jul 11 by cwrw |
On a different thread there Wonky Sheep demanded that posts were either deleted or edited or else they would be taking the matter up with their solicitors and taking action against the forum. Wonky Sheep created that thread in response to the criticsm on other threads. From what I see on there the forum members have come out all guns blazing in response and the Wonky sheep can't or won't give straight answers. Just imagine the outrage on here if someone threatened Planet Swans with solicitors it would be a 20 pager |
I saw a bit of the other threads and honestly with some of the posts on there you could see why there was a reaction of involving solicitors. Not exactly the smartest thing to say, and a more mature / less sensitive organisation might have just ignored it. However, that's just another example of them being a bit amateurish. Some of the posters over there are not doing the,selves any favours though.
The witchunt now seems to be ovr the type of arrangement with the club and some pointless debate over drinking on buses the day before the game. That's the problem with Internet witchunts, everyone goes looking for shadows and then chases them. | | | |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:53 - Jul 11 with 1661 views | cwrw |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:48 - Jul 11 by jackonicko |
I saw a bit of the other threads and honestly with some of the posts on there you could see why there was a reaction of involving solicitors. Not exactly the smartest thing to say, and a more mature / less sensitive organisation might have just ignored it. However, that's just another example of them being a bit amateurish. Some of the posters over there are not doing the,selves any favours though.
The witchunt now seems to be ovr the type of arrangement with the club and some pointless debate over drinking on buses the day before the game. That's the problem with Internet witchunts, everyone goes looking for shadows and then chases them. |
I agree I think both sides should let it go now. If however there's a shortage of tickets then Wonky Sheep will be in the spotlight for sure | | | |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:56 - Jul 11 with 1655 views | cwrw |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:45 - Jul 11 by Darran |
There's only about five people posting in the thread Bov. |
You keep on thinking that if you're happy.
Why aren't you posting on it then | | | |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:58 - Jul 11 with 1648 views | Darran |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:56 - Jul 11 by cwrw |
You keep on thinking that if you're happy.
Why aren't you posting on it then |
Now you know why Bov. | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 14:08 - Jul 11 with 1637 views | cwrw |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 13:58 - Jul 11 by Darran |
Now you know why Bov. |
Names cwrw and no I don't | | | |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 14:11 - Jul 11 with 1631 views | Darran |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 14:08 - Jul 11 by cwrw |
Names cwrw and no I don't |
Sorry Bov but you do. | |
| |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 14:17 - Jul 11 with 1623 views | cwrw |
| FAO Phil Sumbler re: Wonky Sheep on 14:11 - Jul 11 by Darran |
Sorry Bov but you do. |
I don't | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
