| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here 19:02 - Sep 21 with 5570 views | westx |
This post has been edited by an administrator |  |
| |  |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:38 - Sep 21 with 1506 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:24 - Sep 21 by DwightYorkeSuperstar |
When you disagree with someone in work etc, do you shout at them, swear at them, call them trolls and tell them they aren't clever because you are too intelligent for their non-existent trolling?
Take a step back and realise how sill you look, along with the rest of them, when you accuse me of such a silly thing.
Grow up, Lisa. I believe you're an adult, use your adult brain. |
stop trying to be rude DYSS - you're not bright enough to get away with it. | | | |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:41 - Sep 21 with 1491 views | morningstar |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:14 - Sep 21 by Jackfath |
This forum would be a far poorer place with out the following posters.
Dwight
Perch
Darran
FACT
All three come in for HUGE abuse on here, none of it is ever justified. |
100% agree.................... Just thank god you didn't add yourself too that list! (I would have put a smiley, but I know that you don't understand what they mean) |  |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:42 - Sep 21 with 1488 views | exiledclaseboy |
Of course not. Dwight is an annoying little dweeb without doubt, but given some of the personal abuse, bile and downright poison that's been allowed to pass unmoderated on here this past month or so, he's an asset. He doesn't insult or abuse. Dealing with Dwight is easy, he tends to disappear when you start pointing out the blatant inaccuracies in most of his posts. |  |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:43 - Sep 21 with 1476 views | Naughty71 |
No one deserves to be banned, no matter how much you dislike what they have to say ( you can't actually dislike the person if you've never met them).
DYSS has a voice and an opinion, if you don't like it, debate, converse, or ignore, but you can't advocate a ban because you don't like what they have to say.
Until DYSS abuses another poster (which I have never seen by the way) he is welcome to post his view on things just as much as the rest of us are. |  |
| "Who scored that Naughty?", "I don't know, I've forgotten my bl**dy glasses again!". |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:47 - Sep 21 with 1455 views | westx |
Gordon brown is doing his job here could be a momentous victory for Dwight | |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:47 - Sep 21 with 1455 views | Phil_S |
Not liking a poster's views is exactly what the ignore button was made for
Anybody got any objections if I move this post across to the non football board in the absence of a totally pointless posts board?
Ta |  | | |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:50 - Sep 21 with 1444 views | Spratty |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:18 - Sep 21 by londonlisa2001 |
I have no problem with anyone talking crap even deliberately (although as I have said before it is an incredible waste of someone's time, but that is up to them). I think, though that when it oversteps the mark into being spiteful about people that is too much. It has happened a few times recently and that, in my opinion, is not on. |
It bodes well that you have no problem with people talking crap otherwise you might have to cut your own ears off.
Has it ever flashed upon your mental horizon that other opinions may be as valid as your own even more so.
I agree about the spite, what was that lie you were reiterating about ML going to Paris
or about ML also unable to manage Canas because he fell out with him and that is why he did not play him after Manu? Even though Canas was actually taken off injured in that match and was out for weeks. At least try and make them believable.
http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/Swansea-City-s-Michael-Laudrup-hunts-mid
Oh yes didn't you also amazingly make up that you thought Huw had actually pretended we could not recall Ki to cover up for the fact Laudrup didn't want him lol. Read the whole article.
You were also very rude about DYSS on that other thread without any proof when you claimed if you did not know about it it had not occurred. Is that what they call megalomania?
Still perhaps you were a little the worse for wear from you day in hospitality at Chelsea
I can understand that. I love a works do |  | | |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:54 - Sep 21 with 1428 views | Neath_Jack |
Spratty's Law.
Can someone make that a Wiki entry please. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:58 - Sep 21 with 1415 views | JackSomething |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:54 - Sep 21 by Neath_Jack |
Spratty's Law.
Can someone make that a Wiki entry please. |
I don't think you could find a thread less about Laudrup than this one. Doesn't stop our Spratty though.
He's very quick to react when it's Lisa or ECB. Must feel threatened. I hope they take it as a compliment. |  |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:59 - Sep 21 with 1411 views | Treforys_Jack |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:47 - Sep 21 by Phil_S |
Not liking a poster's views is exactly what the ignore button was made for
Anybody got any objections if I move this post across to the non football board in the absence of a totally pointless posts board?
Ta |
Nail hit firmly on head, end of thread |  | | |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:01 - Sep 21 with 1405 views | Neath_Jack |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:58 - Sep 21 by JackSomething |
I don't think you could find a thread less about Laudrup than this one. Doesn't stop our Spratty though.
He's very quick to react when it's Lisa or ECB. Must feel threatened. I hope they take it as a compliment. |
Its bonkers mate, Godwins Law got f*ck all on Spratty's Law. | |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:03 - Sep 21 with 1397 views | Phil_S |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:01 - Sep 21 by Neath_Jack |
Its bonkers mate, Godwins Law got f*ck all on Spratty's Law. |
It's amazing how his name can come up so often almost 8 months after he left | | | |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:03 - Sep 21 with 1397 views | westx |
Spratty is another of the forum trolls | |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:10 - Sep 21 with 1376 views | ScoobyDoo |
DYSS is a good guy, even if he is a jack. | | | |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:18 - Sep 21 with 1361 views | JackSomething |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:10 - Sep 21 by ScoobyDoo |
DYSS is a good guy, even if he is a jack. |
I feel the same way about Roath Magic. | |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:37 - Sep 21 with 1301 views | Darran |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 20:03 - Sep 21 by westx |
Spratty is another of the forum trolls |
He's the biggest tw*t I've seen on here in 12 years and believe me I've seen a few. |  |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 21:07 - Sep 21 with 1260 views | TheArtChappy |
He's always been alright when peaking to me on here. Some things he says are annoying but no worse than some people I've sat near down the liberty. And his avatar is annoying but as I'm on my phone it cuts it out.
One question if some one is on ignore, does it look strange seeing people reply to something that you can't see? I have noticed he seems to be having people having a go in loads of threads, just seems over the top | |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 21:07 - Sep 21 with 1260 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:50 - Sep 21 by Spratty |
It bodes well that you have no problem with people talking crap otherwise you might have to cut your own ears off.
Has it ever flashed upon your mental horizon that other opinions may be as valid as your own even more so.
I agree about the spite, what was that lie you were reiterating about ML going to Paris
or about ML also unable to manage Canas because he fell out with him and that is why he did not play him after Manu? Even though Canas was actually taken off injured in that match and was out for weeks. At least try and make them believable.
http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/Swansea-City-s-Michael-Laudrup-hunts-mid
Oh yes didn't you also amazingly make up that you thought Huw had actually pretended we could not recall Ki to cover up for the fact Laudrup didn't want him lol. Read the whole article.
You were also very rude about DYSS on that other thread without any proof when you claimed if you did not know about it it had not occurred. Is that what they call megalomania?
Still perhaps you were a little the worse for wear from you day in hospitality at Chelsea
I can understand that. I love a works do |
If only at some point this weekend you'd mentioned that Huw said that Laudrup was the most honest and trustworthy person he'd ever met in his entire life I would have had a full house at Spratty bingo. Had all the others..... Ah well, next weekend perhaps  | | | |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 21:10 - Sep 21 with 1255 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 21:07 - Sep 21 by londonlisa2001 |
If only at some point this weekend you'd mentioned that Huw said that Laudrup was the most honest and trustworthy person he'd ever met in his entire life I would have had a full house at Spratty bingo. Had all the others..... Ah well, next weekend perhaps |
Mark it off, Lis. He said that exact thing about Huw saying that about Laudrup in another thread in which he inexplicably decided to lecture me about how awesome Laudrup is. | |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 21:11 - Sep 21 with 1251 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 21:10 - Sep 21 by exiledclaseboy |
Mark it off, Lis. He said that exact thing about Huw saying that about Laudrup in another thread in which he inexplicably decided to lecture me about how awesome Laudrup is. |
oh fantastic - I missed that one!
HOUSE  | | | |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 21:35 - Sep 21 with 1218 views | Gowerjack |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:14 - Sep 21 by Jackfath |
This forum would be a far poorer place with out the following posters.
Dwight
Perch
Darran
FACT
All three come in for HUGE abuse on here, none of it is ever justified. |
What was that Meatloaf song...? |  |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 21:37 - Sep 21 with 1211 views | Gowerjack |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:47 - Sep 21 by Phil_S |
Not liking a poster's views is exactly what the ignore button was made for
Anybody got any objections if I move this post across to the non football board in the absence of a totally pointless posts board?
Ta |
I tried that...
Didn't work | |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 23:14 - Sep 21 with 1120 views | perchrockjack |
I've been accused of abuse and guilty as charged,however if I've ever instigated it then I apologise genuinely unreservedly.
If someone defames me like a coward behind a keyboard then I ll certainly see my arse as I do when posters I know and respect get insults.
It's just me, I don't take backwards steps and I never truly forget anyone really pushing it. I
We can discuss without abuse and Lisa and loh are good examples although I think dwight is getting to Lisa. He is me a little and I hope for his sake he ain't an imposter on a windup .
Loh and me had some epic exchanges on Middle East ,bony too and while they think I'm either mad, stupid or ill advised we ve not yet exchanged pm s to sort things out..I myself believe what has been posted on that subject and the 9/11 one is simply surreal. But we carry on without bitterness which is different to calling long term fans all sorts of names because unlike them they have no life outside football.
Anyway, no he should not be banned. We ve lost davillon and we need these people | |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 23:29 - Sep 21 with 1108 views | Banosswan |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 19:50 - Sep 21 by Spratty |
It bodes well that you have no problem with people talking crap otherwise you might have to cut your own ears off.
Has it ever flashed upon your mental horizon that other opinions may be as valid as your own even more so.
I agree about the spite, what was that lie you were reiterating about ML going to Paris
or about ML also unable to manage Canas because he fell out with him and that is why he did not play him after Manu? Even though Canas was actually taken off injured in that match and was out for weeks. At least try and make them believable.
http://www.southwales-eveningpost.co.uk/Swansea-City-s-Michael-Laudrup-hunts-mid
Oh yes didn't you also amazingly make up that you thought Huw had actually pretended we could not recall Ki to cover up for the fact Laudrup didn't want him lol. Read the whole article.
You were also very rude about DYSS on that other thread without any proof when you claimed if you did not know about it it had not occurred. Is that what they call megalomania?
Still perhaps you were a little the worse for wear from you day in hospitality at Chelsea
I can understand that. I love a works do |
Fack me mike/rebecca. Give it a rest! |  |
| Ever since my son was... never conceived, because I've never had consensual sex without money involved... I've always kind of looked at you as... a thing, that I could live next to... in accordance with state laws. | | Poll: | How do you like your steak? |
| |
| Would you ban Dwightyorkesuperstar from here on 23:45 - Sep 21 with 1098 views | perchrockjack |
Paradise by the dashboard light | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
