| VAR again 21:29 - Dec 9 with 1137 views | kingslandstand1 |
Didn't want it but surely that was a pen for Wolves? And again, didnt want it but deserved the goal because of that |  | | |  |
| VAR again on 21:57 - Dec 9 with 1063 views | saintmark1976 |
Surprised you don’t understand Kingsland.
It’s all to do with ground size. West Ham’s ground size is much bigger than Wolves hence is of more importance to The Premiership financially for them to stay up.
Don’t forget that Notts Forest had three nailed on penalties denied at Goodison not that long ago. Everton ( who at the time were in deep relegation trouble ) couldn’t be allowed to go down because they were having a massive new ground built could they ?
There are multi millions swirling around in The Premiership so perhaps that’s why the smaller clubs consistently get the rough end of the stick V A R wise ? |  |
| |
| VAR again on 22:02 - Dec 9 with 1052 views | kingslandstand1 |
| VAR again on 21:57 - Dec 9 by saintmark1976 |
Surprised you don’t understand Kingsland.
It’s all to do with ground size. West Ham’s ground size is much bigger than Wolves hence is of more importance to The Premiership financially for them to stay up.
Don’t forget that Notts Forest had three nailed on penalties denied at Goodison not that long ago. Everton ( who at the time were in deep relegation trouble ) couldn’t be allowed to go down because they were having a massive new ground built could they ?
There are multi millions swirling around in The Premiership so perhaps that’s why the smaller clubs consistently get the rough end of the stick V A R wise ? |
Ah yes! Forgot also them being a London club rather that provincial  | | | |
| VAR again on 22:12 - Dec 9 with 1037 views | saintmark1976 |
| VAR again on 22:02 - Dec 9 by kingslandstand1 |
Ah yes! Forgot also them being a London club rather that provincial |
Yep, I’ll refrain from calling it corruption. Others less kind hearted may possibly suggest otherwise. | |
| |
| VAR again on 00:24 - Dec 10 with 968 views | dirk_doone |
| VAR again on 22:12 - Dec 9 by saintmark1976 |
Yep, I’ll refrain from calling it corruption. Others less kind hearted may possibly suggest otherwise. |
You are right: nearly all close penalty calls will be given in favour of the bigger club. |  |
| |
| VAR again on 06:19 - Dec 10 with 836 views | solent_toffee |
| VAR again on 21:57 - Dec 9 by saintmark1976 |
Surprised you don’t understand Kingsland.
It’s all to do with ground size. West Ham’s ground size is much bigger than Wolves hence is of more importance to The Premiership financially for them to stay up.
Don’t forget that Notts Forest had three nailed on penalties denied at Goodison not that long ago. Everton ( who at the time were in deep relegation trouble ) couldn’t be allowed to go down because they were having a massive new ground built could they ?
There are multi millions swirling around in The Premiership so perhaps that’s why the smaller clubs consistently get the rough end of the stick V A R wise ? |
To say there is a biased towards Everton is laughable. This is the same Everton who were deducted a total of eight points, a larger punishment than Forest, never ever get a penalty and get shafted by VAR on a regular basis.
The Forest game being a one off.
I do feel for Wolves and especially O’ Neill. They are on the wrong end of VAR far too many times. That was definitely a penalty last night, both were. He’s also had to sell his best players due to FFP, more grating is that one of them was to Chelsea (Pedro Neto) for whom FFP doesn’t include. | | | |
| VAR again on 06:23 - Dec 10 with 835 views | saintwizzler |
After the untimely passing of Mick Antonio, the last thing West Ham and the Sky show needed was anything but a home win.
Makes good telly dont it?
RIP Toni 🕯️🦄
|  |
| We thought that we had the answers,
It was the questions we had wrong. |
| |
| VAR again on 08:10 - Dec 10 with 755 views | saintmark1976 |
| VAR again on 06:19 - Dec 10 by solent_toffee |
To say there is a biased towards Everton is laughable. This is the same Everton who were deducted a total of eight points, a larger punishment than Forest, never ever get a penalty and get shafted by VAR on a regular basis.
The Forest game being a one off.
I do feel for Wolves and especially O’ Neill. They are on the wrong end of VAR far too many times. That was definitely a penalty last night, both were. He’s also had to sell his best players due to FFP, more grating is that one of them was to Chelsea (Pedro Neto) for whom FFP doesn’t include. |
I didn’t say there was an ongoing bias toward Everton toffee because let’s face it they are not a big club are they ?
In truth they are much like ourselves.Currently, a not particularly large ground capacity and they haven’t won anything since the ice age.
Reference the Forest game being “ a one off “. Very convenient though wasn’t it, a new large capacity ground costing millions being constructed and a financially catastrophic relegation quite possible at the time.
As for Wolves yesterday. Exactly what now is the purpose of V A R other than to ensure that the big ground capacity clubs continue to remain so ? At 1-0 down their player was through on goal and pushed violently in the back by a desperate West Ham defender, yet V A R suggests all is well.Yeh,right.
Throughout history it’s been proven that where there is money involved there is corruption involved, why logically should football now be immune ? | |
| |
| VAR again on 08:50 - Dec 10 with 700 views | kentsouthampton |
Another bedwetters thread. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| VAR again on 09:53 - Dec 10 with 621 views | kingslandstand1 |
You don't have to join it  | | | |
| VAR again on 14:03 - Dec 10 with 464 views | Flamingbankers |
Clear shove in the back for everyone to see except the VAR officials - definitely cheating. Time to scrap VAR. All these referees mean that it's not a game of football anymore; it's a game of ref's. One ref's plenty. VAR's a fiddle and a con, clearly open to corruption. Goal line decisions that's all that's needed. | | | |
| VAR again on 14:49 - Dec 10 with 430 views | kentsouthampton |
| VAR again on 14:03 - Dec 10 by Flamingbankers |
Clear shove in the back for everyone to see except the VAR officials - definitely cheating. Time to scrap VAR. All these referees mean that it's not a game of football anymore; it's a game of ref's. One ref's plenty. VAR's a fiddle and a con, clearly open to corruption. Goal line decisions that's all that's needed. |
I'm betting the launderette nearest your mum's house is flat out. | | | |
| VAR again on 20:01 - Dec 10 with 333 views | solent_toffee |
| VAR again on 08:10 - Dec 10 by saintmark1976 |
I didn’t say there was an ongoing bias toward Everton toffee because let’s face it they are not a big club are they ?
In truth they are much like ourselves.Currently, a not particularly large ground capacity and they haven’t won anything since the ice age.
Reference the Forest game being “ a one off “. Very convenient though wasn’t it, a new large capacity ground costing millions being constructed and a financially catastrophic relegation quite possible at the time.
As for Wolves yesterday. Exactly what now is the purpose of V A R other than to ensure that the big ground capacity clubs continue to remain so ? At 1-0 down their player was through on goal and pushed violently in the back by a desperate West Ham defender, yet V A R suggests all is well.Yeh,right.
Throughout history it’s been proven that where there is money involved there is corruption involved, why logically should football now be immune ? |
Wolves have been getting battered by VAR for about 18 months, regardless of who or where they are playing. Hence they were the only ones who voted to have it removed at the beginning of the season.
There is an obvious bias towards the snide six, but Wolves get shafted in games against most clubs.
I feel for O’Neill, he must be tempted to lose his shit in post match interviews and call it out. | | | |
| VAR again on 21:01 - Dec 10 with 301 views | cocklebreath |
| VAR again on 20:01 - Dec 10 by solent_toffee |
Wolves have been getting battered by VAR for about 18 months, regardless of who or where they are playing. Hence they were the only ones who voted to have it removed at the beginning of the season.
There is an obvious bias towards the snide six, but Wolves get shafted in games against most clubs.
I feel for O’Neill, he must be tempted to lose his shit in post match interviews and call it out. |
Except When they play saints. We had a shocking VAR decision against us |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
