By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Barton could have jumped in a car, mown a few of our players down, got a gun out and shot 2, built a bonfire and burnt a few stragglers and still not had a yellow in the opening 10 mins.
The standard is poor. I would happily see them paid more, 70k ish a year for a ref is not alot, all the scrutiny etc, but a far higher standard is needed.
It looked like the Lino made the call not the ref. on motd it's clear that routs says to the ref "wtf was that about" at the challenge and rightly so. Never a red in a million years had the ref taken control moments earlier maybe Henry would have calmed down and not made the second challenge.
Will have to be rescinded if there is a shred of sense on the panel. By the way the same Lino missed a ball going out of play moments earlier right under his nose and gave a blatant throw in to QPR that the ref over ruled.
Quite simply the officials had an absolute mare today and should have to sit out officiating for at least the next month. Fools
1
Routledge sending off on 00:46 - Jan 2 with 2306 views
Routledge sending off on 00:45 - Jan 2 by headcleaner
It looked like the Lino made the call not the ref. on motd it's clear that routs says to the ref "wtf was that about" at the challenge and rightly so. Never a red in a million years had the ref taken control moments earlier maybe Henry would have calmed down and not made the second challenge.
Will have to be rescinded if there is a shred of sense on the panel. By the way the same Lino missed a ball going out of play moments earlier right under his nose and gave a blatant throw in to QPR that the ref over ruled.
Quite simply the officials had an absolute mare today and should have to sit out officiating for at least the next month. Fools
The shame of it is that the refs earlier mistakes will be irrelevant in deciding an appeal.
The video will be examined and it is clear that WR kicks out at a prone opponent,and thats a red card offence.
Sterling was not charged as it was not deemed 'extreme circumstance' if WR was extreme then I will have nothing more to say other than bent and corrupt. When the London and national press support what we say you know it was a wrong decision
I am but a dot, but a dot that can cause an earthquake
Routledge sending off on 00:11 - Jan 2 by Gowerjack
All I can say is there is a difference between what happens in the course of normal play and something that is deliberate and takes place when the ball is dead.
WR is badly fouled twice then shows his frustration by kicking his opponent when the ball is dead.
You mean like what Shelvey got done for and Stirling did not? Oh hang on, the ball was dead when Stirling punched Fed full in the face*
I wouldn't be surprised to see the FA take that stance to be fair.
It's a load of horse shit. You see leg breaking tackles go virtually unpunished (not just Henry's today) as well as blatant cheating and reacting in any way towards your opponent like Routledge did is seen as some horrific crime. Footballs got it all wrong
0
Routledge sending off on 01:04 - Jan 2 with 2238 views
Routledge sending off on 00:29 - Jan 2 by JackFish
In about the fifth minute Siggy turned one of their players on the edge of the box who then rugby tackled him before he could run into the area and get a cross away, you couldn't get a more blatant yellow card but because it's in the first ten minutes it gets ignored. Second half he had the book out straight away.
Surprise, surprise, that was the lovely Joey Barton.
The ref got it wrong, it was no way violent conduct by Routs.
Just watched it again. For starters, Henry nearly took Routs head off with a dangerous high boot. Less than 5 seconds later, he could have broke Routs leg. Very lucky to get a yellow.
Routs did not kick out - glad we have appealed, although mire than a lottery where we are concerned, with the FA.
You mean like what Shelvey got done for and Stirling did not? Oh hang on, the ball was dead when Stirling punched Fed full in the face*
* as much a punch as Routs kicked out
So, if the referee was correct in the Sterling case and just touching a player isn't enough for a red card, then Routledge has a case.
From the FIFA website "A player is guilty of violent conduct if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball"
In real football, I don't think that Sterling deserves a red card (Shelvey probably did), but we are so used to the idea that any contact off the ball is a sending off.
0
Routledge sending off on 09:44 - Jan 2 with 1827 views
Routledge sending off on 09:42 - Jan 2 by somersetsimon
So, if the referee was correct in the Sterling case and just touching a player isn't enough for a red card, then Routledge has a case.
From the FIFA website "A player is guilty of violent conduct if he uses excessive force or brutality against an opponent when not challenging for the ball"
In real football, I don't think that Sterling deserves a red card (Shelvey probably did), but we are so used to the idea that any contact off the ball is a sending off.
If that red is upheld under that description GM is right, the whole thing is just bullsh1t.
It s pretty obvious the best thing Routlidge could hve done is roll about "in agony" on the ground punching the pitch in frustration for good effect.
This would IMMEDIATLEY have resulted in a red card being shown and three points in the bag for us,maybe a place in Europe as a result come the end of the season.
GM really must give his players more acting lessons....it s the only way to really influence an officials decision...
PROUD RECIPIENT OF THE THIRD PLANET SWANS LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARD.
"Per ardua ad astra"
Routledge sending off on 09:46 - Jan 2 by Lord_Bony
It s pretty obvious the best thing Routlidge could hve done is roll about "in agony" on the ground punching the pitch in frustration for good effect.
This would IMMEDIATLEY have resulted in a red card being shown and three points in the bag for us,maybe a place in Europe as a result come the end of the season.
GM really must give his players more acting lessons....it s the only way to really influence an officials decision...
He'd have probably been booked for play acting.
The sending off came so late that it wouldn't have changed a draw to a win. Green's probably would have.
The ref did everything in his power to ensure we didn't get anything from the game.
People say it's our fault for not appealing. Well watch Stoke players against Man United. Where did that get them?
There was no kick out at all. And anyway, it's fine to retaliate, they've set that precedent with Sterling.
Routledge sending off on 09:46 - Jan 2 by Lord_Bony
It s pretty obvious the best thing Routlidge could hve done is roll about "in agony" on the ground punching the pitch in frustration for good effect.
This would IMMEDIATLEY have resulted in a red card being shown and three points in the bag for us,maybe a place in Europe as a result come the end of the season.
GM really must give his players more acting lessons....it s the only way to really influence an officials decision...
The ref got it right according to what the lino told him. The truth is it warranted a word from the ref to say 'Calm down and be careful from now on'. That's it.
The lino's were incompetent yesterday. Both of them.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
