Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 12:10 - Jul 19 with 4606 views | SuddenLad | I think someone should do their homework and ring the EFL. How on earth Southall can be considered suitable for such a position is beyond comprehension. It's impossible to fathom. | |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 12:54 - Jul 19 with 4414 views | boromat | Hopefully this works out perfectly. If Matt Southall is one of those individuals charged by the EFL it gives the EFL a brilliant very public opportunity to strip someone of a role in an EFL club. | |
| |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 13:17 - Jul 19 with 4300 views | D_Alien | Its worth pointing out that, as far as i can gather, a CEO doesn't have to be an owner or a director, in which case the EFL might be powerless to intervene* * even if they had the balls, which we know they don't | |
| |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 13:18 - Jul 19 with 4297 views | judd | Should have gone to Coventry | |
| |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 16:48 - Jul 19 with 3926 views | TomRAFC | Trust members might want to check their inbox... | |
| |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 17:04 - Jul 19 with 3864 views | DaleiLama |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 16:48 - Jul 19 by TomRAFC | Trust members might want to check their inbox... |
I can see Argos orders taking a lot longer to pick and get to the counter now. Not to mention Val having a shot of espresso with her cocoa before she turns in - they are going to be even busier now. | |
| |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 18:21 - Jul 19 with 3694 views | NorthernDale | The question is, how can he be CEO at Birmingham and also hold significant shares in the Dale, would the EFL allow this? | | | |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 18:28 - Jul 19 with 3646 views | TomRAFC |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 18:21 - Jul 19 by NorthernDale | The question is, how can he be CEO at Birmingham and also hold significant shares in the Dale, would the EFL allow this? |
I wondered the same myself but have been told he could. It's a moot point though. According to the list of shareholders, which was updated for the last EGM, no one associated with Morton House owns a single share. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 18:54 - Jul 19 with 3574 views | wozzrafc |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 18:28 - Jul 19 by TomRAFC | I wondered the same myself but have been told he could. It's a moot point though. According to the list of shareholders, which was updated for the last EGM, no one associated with Morton House owns a single share. |
Hadn’t just got an agreement to purchase 25% which is now 12.5% . Typical southall splashing the cash but not actually paying!! I dread to think what he’s planning for Birmingham city | | | |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 22:52 - Jul 19 with 3151 views | DorkingDale |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 13:17 - Jul 19 by D_Alien | Its worth pointing out that, as far as i can gather, a CEO doesn't have to be an owner or a director, in which case the EFL might be powerless to intervene* * even if they had the balls, which we know they don't |
...which is why he stated that he wouldn't be at director at Dale. Just enough power to control the £ without having to pass the EFL tests. | | | |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 23:05 - Jul 19 with 3111 views | RAFCBLUE |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 13:17 - Jul 19 by D_Alien | Its worth pointing out that, as far as i can gather, a CEO doesn't have to be an owner or a director, in which case the EFL might be powerless to intervene* * even if they had the balls, which we know they don't |
https://www.efl.com/-more/governance/efl-rules--regulations/efl-regulations/appe ‘Relevant Person’ means in respect of any Club any individual Person (and not any Entity) operating the powers that are usually associated with the powers of a director of a company incorporated under the 2006 Act (as a Company limited by shares or by guarantee). Further, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, the following individuals shall in any event be deemed to qualify as a Relevant Person: (a) a director as defined by Section 250 of the 2006 Act; (b) a shadow director as defined by Section 251 of the 2006 Act; (c) a person registered as a director or secretary of the Club with the Registrar of Companies; (d) a person for whom a Form AP01 (to be filed with the Registrar of Companies) has been completed in relation to the Club; (e) a person who has been elected to become a director of the Club at a meeting of the board of directors of the Club; (f) a person who has been elected to become a director of the Club at a meeting of the members of the Club; (g) a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the persons constituting the management of the Club are accustomed to act; (h) any Authorised Signatory; (i) any duly appointed signatory (as that term is utilised in Regulation 46.1); (j) any ‘chief executive’ officer, ‘general manager’, ‘chief operating officer’ or any other person undertaking any duties which would objectively be considered to be equivalent to those roles; (k) any person appointed by those with Control over the Club to represent their interests in the management of the Club; and (l) a person who has Control over the affairs of the Club, but the definition of ‘Relevant Person’ expressly excludes any external legal, financial or other professional advisers where they are acting in a capacity regulated by a professional regulatory body and do not hold any interest (in excess of a 5% shareholding) in the Club . The EFL will get a say on him if these rules are correct. | |
| |
Southall to Birmingham Confirmed on 16:47 - Jul 20 with 2671 views | Zac_B | A lot of Birmingham fans asking why Paul Richardson would bring in a crook like Southall when he's a lifelong fan. Is he actually a lifelong fan? Or a lifelong fan in the sense that DB was? | | | |
| |