By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
If we get offered 35 million for Sygi in the transfer window should we sell? on 09:25 - Jan 11 by shandyjack
only if all was to be re invested direct into the squad. All £35m of it
We don't need the money because as widely reported by Wales' greatest investigative journalist Mr Wathan , the reason the old shareholders sold to the new "investors" was that they had deeper pockets to take us to the next level.
From the football perspective (the fan's), absolutely not.
From the business perspective (the Board's), probably yes. We'd clear our debts and then be able to start next season in the Championship with a clean slate.
0
If we get offered 35 million for Sygi in the transfer window should we sell? on 10:12 - Jan 11 with 4202 views
It's a massively inflated price but he's the only genuine quality we have left. If we sell him we're down. There's no chance of it being reinvested in a good replacement.
0
If we get offered 35 million for Sygi in the transfer window should we sell? on 10:42 - Jan 11 with 4145 views
Assuming we want to stay up? Come on, yes of course we should bloody well take it, and spend every penny plus the other 30 million they have 'promised' on buying a new defence, Britton replacement, a winger and someone that can kick a dead ball. Not that anyone is going to offer it, obviously.
In general, have we learned nothing from the Michu incident. Rely totally on one player that could get injured, especially one that has one decent game in four, whilst now having a crap defence, and you're going down.
He's a decent player, and done a bloody good job for us over the years, but turn down 35 million for Sigurdsson my arse.
If we get offered 35 million for Sygi in the transfer window should we sell? on 10:12 - Jan 11 by Morfa_Same
It's a massively inflated price but he's the only genuine quality we have left. If we sell him we're down. There's no chance of it being reinvested in a good replacement.
If we get offered 35 million for Sygi in the transfer window should we sell? on 10:42 - Jan 11 by monmouth
Assuming we want to stay up? Come on, yes of course we should bloody well take it, and spend every penny plus the other 30 million they have 'promised' on buying a new defence, Britton replacement, a winger and someone that can kick a dead ball. Not that anyone is going to offer it, obviously.
In general, have we learned nothing from the Michu incident. Rely totally on one player that could get injured, especially one that has one decent game in four, whilst now having a crap defence, and you're going down.
He's a decent player, and done a bloody good job for us over the years, but turn down 35 million for Sigurdsson my arse.
The problem isn't receiving the money, it's numpty head Jenkins being able to spend it. Pondering fckwit has lost many a transaction because of his lack of leadership and decision making.
I wouldn't trust him to spend anything wisely, his personal agendas regards his own ego and money would get in the way.
Sack the cnt.
Nolan sympathiser, clout expert, personal friend of Leigh Dineen, advocate and enforcer of porridge swallows.
The official inventor of the tit w@nk.
If we get offered 35 million for Sygi in the transfer window should we sell? on 10:42 - Jan 11 by monmouth
Assuming we want to stay up? Come on, yes of course we should bloody well take it, and spend every penny plus the other 30 million they have 'promised' on buying a new defence, Britton replacement, a winger and someone that can kick a dead ball. Not that anyone is going to offer it, obviously.
In general, have we learned nothing from the Michu incident. Rely totally on one player that could get injured, especially one that has one decent game in four, whilst now having a crap defence, and you're going down.
He's a decent player, and done a bloody good job for us over the years, but turn down 35 million for Sigurdsson my arse.
I suspect most people voting no are doing so precisely because they know that the money won't be reinvested in the team by our "investors ".
Of course, £35M for Gylfi when Schneiderlin is going for £22M is insane and won't be offered.
Planet Swans Prediction League Winner Season 2013-14. Runner up 2014_15.
Aye thats true. Other objectives, and Jenkins proven inability to conclude the necessary transactions to strengthen might well mean we'd be better hanging on to any assets we have and settling for less money to strengthen, but assuming it were true, and we had to do that because we couldn't manage the windfall properly, it'd probably be chucking away our last chance to really boost the odds on survival.
If we get offered 35 million for Sygi in the transfer window should we sell? on 10:12 - Jan 11 by Morfa_Same
It's a massively inflated price but he's the only genuine quality we have left. If we sell him we're down. There's no chance of it being reinvested in a good replacement.
As said before from our perspective no , but in the deluded eyes of Huw Jenkins .OBE sell Siggy and replace him with some 23 year old from Hartlepool's reserves that his spotted on Football Manager that is a 5.5 rated player that scored two in the East Riding cup semi-final, one of the goals was a 25 free kick bent around the wall and beating Blyth Spartons legendary keeper Albert Dingwall. The goal was described by Eddie Hutchin sports reporter for the 'Wearside Gazette' as ' Platiniesqe in it's execution! '
Yes voters presumably applying the same barmy logic they did when we sold Ash, or assume we are already gone. Playing at football manager. Reality of the situation is that if there is a bid of 35m now it wouldn't be that different in the summer and even if significantly lower we'll be buying championship players by then anyway. Can't sell our best players at this point if we want to even think about staying up.