| How someone rates our Fanbase on 20:43 - Mar 3 with 2569 views | funkkk |
I mean, there's zero consistency to the rankings, though ours is probably correct. |  | |  |
| How someone rates our Fanbase on 09:56 - Mar 4 with 2334 views | ParkinsGimp |
I was looking for bURY ?
I wouldnt class us as S""t fans, to be fair we have a decent percentage away following and we are very loyal, usually to our detriment( Kim Jung Hill in particular) .
Bradfurt wont like No fans LOL and Plymouth have always had a decent following, I suppose its mainly classed as home support. In which case ours is pretty poor but the product on offer isnt too good at present. |  | | |
| How someone rates our Fanbase on 10:22 - Mar 4 with 2299 views | AtThePeake |
| How someone rates our Fanbase on 09:56 - Mar 4 by ParkinsGimp |
I was looking for bURY ?
I wouldnt class us as S""t fans, to be fair we have a decent percentage away following and we are very loyal, usually to our detriment( Kim Jung Hill in particular) .
Bradfurt wont like No fans LOL and Plymouth have always had a decent following, I suppose its mainly classed as home support. In which case ours is pretty poor but the product on offer isnt too good at present. |
Done controversially for likes, retweets and replies. Don't read into it too much (or at all). |  |
| |
| How someone rates our Fanbase on 19:36 - Mar 4 with 2114 views | downunder |
| How someone rates our Fanbase on 10:22 - Mar 4 by AtThePeake |
Done controversially for likes, retweets and replies. Don't read into it too much (or at all). |
I see Barnsley fans have a choice between OK and $hit. |  | | |
| How someone rates our Fanbase on 19:45 - Mar 4 with 2104 views | Thacks_Rabbits |
I thought tazzy was still banned from the internet!
What a pointless load of shite! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
