| Game changed when Hoilett came on 16:52 - Jan 1 with 5479 views | MelakaRanger |
Hes rubbish |  | | |  |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:53 - Jan 1 with 4160 views | 08olesen |
Disagree. Zamora should have come off 10 mins earlier, looked knackered. Hoilet did fine |  |
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:57 - Jan 1 with 4083 views | SpiritofGregory |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:53 - Jan 1 by 08olesen |
Disagree. Zamora should have come off 10 mins earlier, looked knackered. Hoilet did fine |
Should of kept Bobby on, if you are trying to tighten your attack the last thing you do is bring on that Kunt! |  | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:57 - Jan 1 with 4088 views | DieByYourSide |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:53 - Jan 1 by 08olesen |
Disagree. Zamora should have come off 10 mins earlier, looked knackered. Hoilet did fine |
Skewing the ball into the side netting when he could've taken it to the corner was a great contribution to be fair. |  |
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:58 - Jan 1 with 4073 views | Match82 |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:57 - Jan 1 by SpiritofGregory |
Should of kept Bobby on, if you are trying to tighten your attack the last thing you do is bring on that Kunt! |
Bobby was shattered. |  | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:58 - Jan 1 with 4070 views | AndyB |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:53 - Jan 1 by 08olesen |
Disagree. Zamora should have come off 10 mins earlier, looked knackered. Hoilet did fine |
Which of the mis-hit crosses and numerous surrendering of possession did he "do fine" with? |  | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:59 - Jan 1 with 4049 views | CHUBBS |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:53 - Jan 1 by 08olesen |
Disagree. Zamora should have come off 10 mins earlier, looked knackered. Hoilet did fine |
If you think giving the ball away cheaply and missing a very good opportunity doing fine then you're right.
The bloke is a useless dud who will make a reasonable league 1 player.
Wasn't his fault what happened though,they can pass the ball well and we can't thats why we were still on the ropes against 10 men.
We're going down unless we can get a midfield that can pass the ball and run like Ki did for their goal. |  | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:01 - Jan 1 with 3995 views | Discodroids |
were a side playing to the sum of it parts and its limitations.
a team of dunne, henry,barton,zamora and god bless him , hill, will never see out the season and survive.
Never.
i dont blame them .i blame Adso of melt, the three old confused men standing on the touchline who look like they are discussing whether to have cod or plaice with their chips when the game as going away from us in the second half
mushy or garden peas bondy??
jesus christ on a tomahawk.
they stood by and watched the game drift away in the second half like excrement on a wet wipe flushing out into the north sea.
zamora, his one supposed weapon in his armoury, a free header from 3 yards out, his meat and drink , goes nearer the fkn corner flag
just not good enough at this level but playing to their limits ,which are short of premier standard by some margin.
if i was a swans fan today and we lost id have been going radio rental.outclassed.
Thank fk bony didnt start, and green stayed on the pitch
this gut wrenching sentimentality for the old guard must stop. [Post edited 1 Jan 2015 17:10]
|  |
| The Duke Of New York. A-Number One.
|
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:02 - Jan 1 with 3983 views | kropotkin41 |
He should have gone into the corner. You take the 1-0, you do not go for bloody glory. Why can't he put his foot on the ball in the corner? |  |
| ‘morbid curiosity about where this is all going’ |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:02 - Jan 1 with 3963 views | SpiritofGregory |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:58 - Jan 1 by Match82 |
Bobby was shattered. |
He would of still given more than Hoilett that's for sure. | | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:03 - Jan 1 with 3947 views | SpiritofGregory |
What was Harry think off? | | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:03 - Jan 1 with 3952 views | oldmeadoniansR |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:01 - Jan 1 by Discodroids |
were a side playing to the sum of it parts and its limitations.
a team of dunne, henry,barton,zamora and god bless him , hill, will never see out the season and survive.
Never.
i dont blame them .i blame Adso of melt, the three old confused men standing on the touchline who look like they are discussing whether to have cod or plaice with their chips when the game as going away from us in the second half
mushy or garden peas bondy??
jesus christ on a tomahawk.
they stood by and watched the game drift away in the second half like excrement on a wet wipe flushing out into the north sea.
zamora, his one supposed weapon in his armoury, a free header from 3 yards out, his meat and drink , goes nearer the fkn corner flag
just not good enough at this level but playing to their limits ,which are short of premier standard by some margin.
if i was a swans fan today and we lost id have been going radio rental.outclassed.
Thank fk bony didnt start, and green stayed on the pitch
this gut wrenching sentimentality for the old guard must stop. [Post edited 1 Jan 2015 17:10]
|
We definately need pace and dynamism we are certainly not lacking effort. | | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:07 - Jan 1 with 3889 views | YorkRanger |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:03 - Jan 1 by oldmeadoniansR |
We definately need pace and dynamism we are certainly not lacking effort. |
Can't agree with the OP. I'm no Hoilett fan, but a one goal lead was always risky and I'm not sure he played a key part in their goal... |  | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:09 - Jan 1 with 3847 views | Pommyhoop |
Title of this thread should be 'when Bony came on',
Thank f'ck e was'nt on earlier.The would've mullered us |  |
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:09 - Jan 1 with 3850 views | Discodroids |
agree 100%.
cant fault effort , its the technical aspect and athletic drive that is missing.
when vargas let that ball run across him in the second half, he looked like a marathon runner falling over the line in high altitude mexico city.
the management let the game be taken away from them by sitting on their hands and hoping for the best from our plucky seasoned professionals.
well plucky seasoned pros dont cut it in this league.
its going to be a long hard winter unless this static manager can introduce some craft and energy to compete.
a lot of our players are at their limit of their capacity. move them on .
get petresso and sutherland back in from loans and give us some hope, something to believe in .some glimpse of a new dawn
and as bryan ferry would say, not the same old scene. [Post edited 1 Jan 2015 17:12]
| |
| The Duke Of New York. A-Number One.
|
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:10 - Jan 1 with 3814 views | SpiritofGregory |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:07 - Jan 1 by YorkRanger |
Can't agree with the OP. I'm no Hoilett fan, but a one goal lead was always risky and I'm not sure he played a key part in their goal... |
Twice in the short time he was on the pitch our attack fizzled out with him on the ball. You do not put him on when you are trying to defend a lead. He does his own thing and does not track back. | | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:55 - Jan 1 with 3615 views | HollowayRanger |
I would have gone for the shot (had no problem with that)
my gripe was I guess he was told help hill in defending but hill and him were both skinned on the inside by the guy that set up their goal |  |
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:04 - Jan 1 with 3564 views | Discodroids |
hanging by a thread .
forget the romantic notion that by some miracle hoilett, traore,phillips and company will suddenly flower in the premier league . they never will.
the bones of the side henry,barton,zamora,dunne and hill are creaking and brittle.
a win today would have been cheap B+Q flock wall paper covering deep running cracks.
watching our painfully limited side in the second half against the skillful swans, that diabolical billy joel song came into my head.
'we didnt start the fire'
'Birth control, Ho Chi Minh, Richard Nixon back again,
Moonshot, Woodstock, Watergate, punk rock,
Begin, Reagan, Palestine, terror on the airline,
Ayatollah's in Iran, Russians in Afghanistan,
"Wheel of Fortune", Sally Ride, heavy metal suicide,
Foreign debts, homeless vets, AIDS, crack, Bernie Goetz, Hypodermics on the shore, China's under martial law, Rock and roller cola wars, Henry, Barton Zamorar I can't take it anymore.. [Post edited 1 Jan 2015 18:06]
| |
| The Duke Of New York. A-Number One.
|
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:07 - Jan 1 with 3543 views | FredManRave |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 17:09 - Jan 1 by Pommyhoop |
Title of this thread should be 'when Bony came on',
Thank f'ck e was'nt on earlier.The would've mullered us |
Agreed. Bony was the game changer and is now the reason my month of no alcohol has become just another month of alcohol. Bastard.
Seems a bit harsh and scapegoateryish to blame Hoilett. We all know he's shite but you can't really blame him for the equalising goal. Blame the players that didn't track Key or heaven forbid congratulate and recognise an uber quality goal from Bony. |  |
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:18 - Jan 1 with 3475 views | paulparker |
Hoilett is fecking useless
He nearly gave the game away against west brom the other week
The pitiful attempt to run to the corner flag but falling flat on his large arse
Was comical , so no surprise that when he came on the ball retention was zero
Problem is what mug is going to take him off our hands |  |
| And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
|
| |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:21 - Jan 1 with 3456 views | PinnerPaul |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 16:53 - Jan 1 by 08olesen |
Disagree. Zamora should have come off 10 mins earlier, looked knackered. Hoilet did fine |
That sums up what we thought in T block, but to prove it wasn't an obvious one, they were saying on radio London, would we have held on if BZ had stayed on?
All opinions and easy to criticise once you know the result! | | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:22 - Jan 1 with 3451 views | Rs_Holy |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:18 - Jan 1 by paulparker |
Hoilett is fecking useless
He nearly gave the game away against west brom the other week
The pitiful attempt to run to the corner flag but falling flat on his large arse
Was comical , so no surprise that when he came on the ball retention was zero
Problem is what mug is going to take him off our hands |
Can't pass, can't shoot has no footballing brain... all he can do is run with it and hope none of the defenders stick a foot out.
He is ok in the Championship so maybe someone like foolham will loan him until the summer??? |  | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:47 - Jan 1 with 3337 views | QPR442 |
The problem is/was is that once again Hoilet broke with the ball and instead of trying to score decides to go into the corner flag and loses it. That's what cost us the goal, him giving the ball away in that corner.
Never would you see Chelsea City or other clubs try and do that game after game.
Once again we blew it. | | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 19:03 - Jan 1 with 3276 views | actonman |
He was no worse keeping hold of the ball than anyone else.
Vargas should have squared his chance when he went through so could equally be criticised .
I will say the fact he was on the left / they had their right mid player sent off and their goal started down their right is fcuking ridiculous 😫 |  | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 19:04 - Jan 1 with 3269 views | gobbles |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:47 - Jan 1 by QPR442 |
The problem is/was is that once again Hoilet broke with the ball and instead of trying to score decides to go into the corner flag and loses it. That's what cost us the goal, him giving the ball away in that corner.
Never would you see Chelsea City or other clubs try and do that game after game.
Once again we blew it. |
That didn't cost us, it was sitting back for the last 20 minutes that cost us, not any one moment.
Zamora should have come off much earlier, in the end he was frantically waving to the bench to come off because he couldn't move.
Had he buried that free header in the first half, we might not have done our panicked try and desperately hold on act. We showed after the goal that we were capable of scoring if we actually attacked. [Post edited 1 Jan 2015 19:12]
|  | | |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 19:11 - Jan 1 with 3244 views | sevenhoop |
| Game changed when Hoilett came on on 18:47 - Jan 1 by QPR442 |
The problem is/was is that once again Hoilet broke with the ball and instead of trying to score decides to go into the corner flag and loses it. That's what cost us the goal, him giving the ball away in that corner.
Never would you see Chelsea City or other clubs try and do that game after game.
Once again we blew it. |
Want another scapegoat for their goal? Have a look at Barton who tried to nick the ball off his opponent instead of going through it and planting the ball 80 yards upfield and they score seconds later.
(I do agree about Hoilett though, useless tw at incapable of holding into the ball or actually connecting properly with any shot!) |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
