 | News
Comment | Complacent QPR caught cold by Owls – Report
at 16:50:47
Generous to give Willock 4. Normally such marks are awarded for effort, but I saw none.
The hoof it up to Armstrong and hope approach might have had some outside chance of success if anyone else had felt sufficiently motivated to canter after him, but leaving someone without composure or (it would seem) much cognitive resource with no other blue and white hoop within 30 yards was always going to test his footballing and mental prowess.
Marti has trained him not to stray off-side, can he now train him not to fall over or (worse) give away incredibly cheap free kicks WHEN HE HAS THE OPPOSITION DEFENDER UNDER PRESSURE?
I would also suggest a few lessons to Lyndon Dykes on explaining where the near post is, but that is surely a lost cause.
Surely we can't be this complacent at Plymouth? |
| News
Comment | Illy and Willy feast on Lumley treats - Report
at 22:09:01
Interesting Clive, always respect your opinion as well as your writing, but you obvs rate it much more highly than I did. I thought the likes of Dunne were guilty of hoofing it a huge amount and we completely failed to "take care of the football" (copyright Mark Warburton) for extended periods. When we did try to hold onto it we were clueless about how to work it forwards. Other than Chair in patches nobody looked creative. Our normally two excellent wingbacks looked decidedly off-form. Willock looked as if the life has been sadly kicked out of him. And it was one of the few times I can remember when we should have been chasing a winner under the lights that we just sort of rolled over and went to sleep like some old boy in a care home with breathing difficulties. Where was the intensity at the end? |
| | Stainrod
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 550 | | Comment Votes: | 1 | | Prediction League: | 0 | | TOTAL: | 551 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.